Project
Gutenberg Consortia
Center's
World Public
Library Collection
Project Gutenberg Consortia Center Collection, a member of the World
Public Library,http://WorldLibrary.net,
bringing the world's eBook collections together.
Conditions
of Use:
This
eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost
no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use
it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with
this eBook or full complete details are online at: http://gutenberg.net/license.
Here are 3 of the more major items to consider:
The eBooks
on the PG sites are not 100% public domain, some of them are copyrighted
and used by permission and thus you may charge for redistribution
only via direct permission from the copyright holders.
Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark [TM]. For any other purpose
than to redistribute eBooks containing the entire Project Gutenberg
file free of charge and with the headers intact, permission is
required.
The public
domain status is per U.S. copyright law. This eBook is from the
Project Gutenberg Consortia Center of the United States.
The mission of the Project Gutenberg Consortia Center is to provide
a similar framework for the collection of eBook collections as does
Project Gutenberg for single eBooks, operating under the practices,
and general guidelines of Project Gutenberg. The major additional
function of Project Gutenberg Consortia Center is to manage the addition
of large collections of eBooks from other eBook creation and collection
centers around the world.
For more great classic literature visit:
The
World Public Library and Project Gutenberg Consortia Center, bringing
the world's eBook collections together http://www.Gutenberg.us
AUSTRALIA, forming as it does a vast island continent in the Southern world, lies
to some extent within the tropical range, for the Tropic of Capricorn traverses its
northern part. At present, however, its most densely populated portion lies just
outside the tropics, and it is this semi-tropical part of Australia with which we
have mostly to do. And apart, too, from the mere fact of Australia being between
certain parallels of latitude, which makes its climate tropical or semi-tropical, as
the case may be, its position is peculiar in that it forms this enormous ocean-girt
continent already described.
One of the most extraordinary circumstances in connection with the Australian
people is, that they have never yet realized their semi-tropical environment. It
would naturally be supposed that a dominating influence of this kind would have,
from the very first, exercised an irresistible effect on their mode of living. But,
on the contrary, the type of the Australian dwelling-house, the clothing of the
Australian people, and, what is more significant than anything else, their food
habits, prove incontestably that they have never recognised the semi-tropical
character of their climate all over the rest of the world it will be found that
the inhabitants of different regions adapt themselves to their surroundings. For
instance, the Laplander and the Hindoo live in such a widely different manner, that
one can scarcely believe they belong to the same human family.
It has, however, been reserved for Australia, strange even from the first, to
prove an exception to this universal law. Yes, strange even from the first! For did
not the earliest arrivals find that the seasons came at the wrong time of the
year; that Christmas-tide came with sunshine, and that the middle of the year was
its coolest part? Were there not found in it curious animals, partly quadruped,
partly bird, and partly reptile? Were there not discovered, also, other animals who
carried their young in a pouch? Moreover, did Dot these first settlers see that the
trees shed their bark, and not their leaves; and that the stones were on the
outside, not the inside, of the cherries?
But even admitting these peculiarities of season, of fauna and of flora it may be
asked, How is it that the people of Australia have never adapted themselves to
their climatic surroundings? The answer, or rather answers, to such an
interrogation must largely consist of matters of opinion. This being the case,
therefore, I call do no more than attempt to give my own explanation of this
singular anomaly. It must be remembered that the one great impetus to
colonisation in Australia was the discovery of gold in 1851. Up till that time
settlement had been proceeding steadily, it is true. Indeed, one may go 80 far as
to say that the development of the country was progressing, although slowly, on
safe and natural lines. But the announcement of the finding of gold, which was
continually being corroborated by successive reports, acted as an electric
stimulus throughout the whole civilized world. As a consequence shipload after
shipload of new comers flocked to Australia, all aflame with the same ardent
desire -- gold. Amongst them were certainly many of the picked men of the earth,
whose spirit will leaven the whole of Australasia for all time to come. Yet even at
the present day we still see the influence of this gold period at work, in the
readiness with which men are caught by any plausible mining prospectus. They
have only to be told that a company is being formed to extract gold out of road
metal, and they are ready to believe it, and, what is more, prepared to put money
into it.
But far better than all this eagerness to amass wealth by some fortunate coup,
would be the natural development of the country. Agriculture and
market-gardening, vine-growing and wine-making, the deep-sea fisheries and all
the other comparatively neglected opportunities, only await their expansion into
vast sources of wealth. What wonder, then, that a continent with so much that is
wanting in connection with its food life should be living in a manner distinctly
opposed to its climatological necessities! In the case of America there is a far
different history. Settlement began there in a small way at first, to gradually
expand as time went on. There was no sudden event, with the exception of the
short-lived Californian gold rush of 1849-50, to set men flocking to its shores in
countless legions. No, in America the inland territory has been peopled, steadily
and slowly at first, but in after years by leaps and bounds, so that its
development has been on a perfectly natural basis.
But there must be something even more than this to explain the want of
adaptation to climate shown in Australia, and it is, I think, to be found in the
following. It must be remembered that Australia has been peopled chiefly by the
Anglo-Saxon race. In such a stock the traditional tendencies are almost
ineradicable, and hence it is that the descendants of the new comers believe as
their fathers, did before them. It's in the blood. For there can be no doubt
but that the Anglo-Saxon thinks there is only one way of living in every part of the
world -- no matter whether the climate be tropical, semi-tropical, or frigid. Those
in the old country live in a certain manner, and all the rest of the globe have every
right to follow their example.
These two facts that Australia was peopled in part by the influx which followed
the discovery of gold, and that its inhabitants belong essentially to the
Anglo-Saxon race, have unquestionably exercised a great influence over our
Australian food-habits. But notwithstanding these powerful underlying factors,
there still remains that most extraordinary circumstance, to which I at first
referred, namely, that the Australian people have never realized their
semi-tropical environment. In order to assign to this latter the prominence it
deserves, it seems desirable to make special inquiry into the peculiarities of the
climate in its different parts. With that object in view, therefore, I wrote for
certain information to the observatories of the four principal Australian
metropolitan centres, namely, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, and Brisbane. As has
always been the case, I received the fullest answers to my requests from Mr. H.C.
Russell, Government Astronomer of New South Wales; from Mr. R.L.J. Ellery,
Government Astronomer of Victoria; from Sir Charles Todd, Government Observer
of South Australia; and from Mr. Clement L. Wragge, Government Meteorologist of
Queensland. And it is with a feeling of considerable indebtedness to these
gentlemen that I acknowledge their uniform kindness. And yet it is important to
remember that the annual temperature, by itself, of any given locality may afford
no indication whatever of its climatic peculiarities. Take for instance the climate
of the North-Eastern portion of the United States. That region is characterized by
intense heat during the summer, and extreme cold in the winter. In New York,
for example, the mean summer temperature ranges as high as 70.9¡, while the
mean winter temperature is as low as 30.1¡; yet the mean temperature of the
whole year is 53.2¡, affording no indication of these extremes. The mean annual
temperature alone, therefore, would be entirely misleading, as it would give no idea
of these alternations of heat and cold. Such being the case, the actual character
of any climate will be far better realized by placing in juxtaposition the mean
annual temperature, the mean temperature of the hot, and the mean temperature
of the cooler months. First of all, then, I purpose showing the mean annual
temperature, and also the mean temperatures for the hot and cooler months, of
the four largest Australian centres.
TABLE showing the Mean Annual Temperature, and also the Mean Temperatures
for the Hot and Cooler Months, of Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, and Brisbane.
Capital.
Mean Annual
Temperature
Mean Temperature for
the Hot Months
Mean Temperature for
the Cold Months
Sydney
62.9
70
58.7
Melbourne
57.5
64.9
53.8
Adelaide
63.1
72.4
58.4
Brisbane
67.74
75.2
64.3
Much will be gained by a comparison of these temperatures of the Australian
capitals with those of some other cities in different parts of the world. A
contrast of this kind will, in my opinion, help to a truer understanding of the
climate of these capitals, than any other. Accordingly I made a successful
application to Mr. H.C. Russell, for the corresponding temperatures of the
following cities: London, Edinburgh, Dublin; Marseilles, Naples, Messina; New
York, San Francisco, New Orleans; Bombay, Calcutta, and Madras.
TABLE showing the Mean Annual Temperature, as well as the Mean Summer and
Winter Temperatures, in twelve different cities.
City.
Mean Annual
Temperature
Mean Summer
Temperature
Mean Winter
Temperature
United Kingdom--London
50.8
62.9
39.5
Edinburgh
47.5
58
38
Dublin
50
61.1
40.7
.
.
.
.
Southern
Europe--Marseilles
(France)
58.3
72.9
45.2
Naples (Italy)
62
74.4
47.6
Messina (Sicily)
65.8
77.2
55
.
.
.
.
United States of
America--New York
53.2
70.9
30.1
San Francisco
56.2
60
51.6
New Orleans
69.8
82
55.8
.
.
.
.
India--Bombay
78.8
82.6
73.8
Calcutta
78.4
83.3
67.8
Madras
82
86.4
76.6
It has been said that Australia is practically Southern Europe, and to a very great
extent this is perfectly true. It will be seen, however, on reference to the
preceding tables, that the Australian climate is more equable than that of
Southern Europe, for there is not such a marked difference between the hot and
the cooler months. In the New England States of North America, as exemplified by
New York, there are intensely hot summers and extremely cold winters -- to which
fact attention has already been drawn. And lastly, in India, the thermometer
stands at such a height, winter as well as summer, that we can only be thankful
our lines are cast in more pleasant places.
Having thus compared the summer and winter temperatures of the
Australian capitals with those of other cities in different parts of the world, it will
be advisable to direct our attention to some details connected with the climate of
these capitals, and of the corresponding colonies generally. Commencing with
Sydney we find that the climate is characterized by the absence of very violent
changes of temperature, owing in great measure to its proximity to the ocean,
which in winter is about 10 ¡ warmer than the air. Its summer climate is marked by
the absence of hot winds, which do not come more than three or four times, and
the are short-lived, seldom lasting more than five or six hours. For a short time in
the midsummer of each year, Sydney is visited regularly by moist sea breezes,
which are enervating to many persons. While these continue the temperature
seldom rises to 80 ¡, but there is so much moisture that they are very
oppressive. Otherwise the climate is one of the most enjoyable in the world. In
other parts of New South Wales towns may be found varying in mean temperature
from 45.8 ¡ at Kiandra to 69.1 ¡ at Bourke. Speaking generally it is a fact that for
the same mean annual temperature in New South Wales the range between
summer and winter temperature is less than it is in Europe.
The climate of Melbourne is characterized by a low average humidity, moderate
rainfall, and moderate winds, strong gales being of her rare occurrence. The most
marked feature is the summer hot wind. A hot wind is always a northerly wind, and
the highest temperature generally occurs a little before the win changes to west
or south-west. When this takes place a sudden drop to a comparatively low
temperature sometimes follows within a few minutes. These hot winds, however,
are not frequent, only averaging eight or nine per annum. These characteristics
will apply to all Victoria except the mountain ranges, where all the climatic
elements vary with the altitude.
The climate of Adelaide is certainly healthy, and, with the exception of the
extreme heat occasionally experienced in summer, the weather may be described
as enjoyable. It must be remembered, however, that these high temperatures are
always accompanied by extreme dryness, the wet bulb thermometer usually
reading at such times from 30¡ to 35¡, or even more, below the temperature of
the air. The heat is, therefore, more bearable than if it was combined with the
humid atmosphere. When the thermometer stands perhaps at something over
100¡, the wet bulb thermometer will show 65¡, and it is this which enables persons
to bear the heat of the summer and carry on their usual pursuits with less
inconvenience and discomfort than is felt in tropical and damp climates, though
the temperature may be 15¡ or 20¡ lower, but nearly saturated with aqueous
vapour, as at Port Darwin, where during the rainy season of the north-west
monsoon the thermometer may stand at only 88¡, whilst the wet bulb at the same
time indicates 86¡. Such an atmosphere, it need hardly be said, is far more
enervating than the hot and dry air of the Adelaide plains. The summer, which may
be termed warm and dry, usually extends over, say, five months; and during the
remainder of the year the climate is simply perfect. The temperature in
mid-winter over the Adelaide plains rarely, if ever, reaches the freezing point,
although there may be sharp frosts, and on still clear nights, so frequently
experienced, copious dews. On the ranges, and on the high lying plains 150 miles
north of Adelaide, lower temperatures are reached, indeed in some years there
have been falls of snow.
The climatic features of Brisbane are, as a mean expression, decidedly
semi-tropical. The months from October to March may be classed as tropic when
vegetation makes luxuriant growth, especially if the rainfall prove abundant.
The rest of the year, from April to September, is marked by a dry, bracing,
"continental" climate, during which the westerly wind often proves very cold,
bleaching, and searching accompanied by great dryness accumulated during the
passage of this current from southern-central Australia. Many settlers affirm
that they feel the peculiar searching character of the dry cold "westerlies" more
keenly than the more "honest" frost of the old country. Yet vigorous
constitutions thoroughly enjoy the bracing nature of the westerly weather of
winter. Hard ground frosts not unfrequently occur in the Darling Downs and
Maranoa districts, especially during May, June, and July, in connection with the
westerly type of climate; and, moreover, ice has at times been observed in the
water-jugs of bedrooms, &c. As before intimated, the westerly winds are marked
by great dryness, so that (saturation= 100) a percentage of relative humidity
below 33 per cent. may occur during the prevalence of such phenomena, not only
in Brisbane, but especially in the more western districts above mentioned. Such
conditions are characterized by great diathermancy of atmosphere, and hence are
frequently followed by days of considerable heat. Even in the tropics, in inland
districts, ground frosts are known to have occurred owing to this extreme
diathermancy of the atmosphere far from the coast, and the consequent
attendant factor of active terrestrial radiation. In coast districts, or that fringe
of country bordering the ocean north from Rockhampton, frost is of very rare
occurrence, and the prevailing winds are between south-east and east-north-east,
with a rainfall far more abundant than that obtaining in other parts of Queensland.
The climate of the country surrounding the southern end of the Gulf of
Carpentaria is very hot and trying from November to March, but genial
thenceforward. It is certainly not unhealthy, and the fevers suffered from
in the northern and gulf districts of Queensland are largely brought on by reckless
or needless exposure.
In addition to the foregoing, which has been obtained from head-quarters, certain
questions were submitted by me as to the climatology of the different colonies.
As it will be seen, these interrogations are somewhat extensive in their scope, and
supply knowledge upon points, which is not ordinarily met with in my descriptions
of Australian climate. In drafting them everything which had a bearing on health
was included as far as possible, and consequently in a work of this kind they
unquestionably deserve a prominent place. In arranging them I purpose placing the
different replies after each question in the following order, namely, New South
Wales, Victoria, South Australia, and Queensland. And in the different answers it
should be borne in mind that Mr. H.C. Russell is responsible for New South Wales;
Mr. R.L.J. Ellery for Victoria; Sir Charles Todd for South Australia; and Mr.
Clement L. Wragge for Queensland.
Is it not a fact that the temperature and barometric pressure are
exposed to sudden and marked changes? Have you known the temperature
to fall, say, as much as 22¡ in 15 minutes?
New South Wales. -- The temperature sometimes changes rapidly in the
summer, coming with a change from a hot wind to a cold southerly, although the
instances are rare. Once in 30 years I have known such a change to amount to 20¡
in 15 minutes. Under ordinary circumstances the change in temperature from hot
to cold wind takes several hours to amount to 20¡. The fluctuations of barometric
pressure are moderate, seldom amounting to half an inch in a day, or an inch in a
week. In England, on the other hand, the pressure sometimes varies quickly
to the extent of two inches.
Victoria. -- Yes; the temperature much more so than the barometric pressure;
it has fallen from a high temperature to 20 and even 30 degrees sometimes in as
many minutes, when a hot north wind has suddenly changed to a cold southerly
one. But such sudden and great changes occur very seldom, and then only in the
hot summer months, and are known as "the change." On several occasions in the
last 30 years it has fallen from 105¡ in the shade to 70¡ and 65 ¡ in the shade in
less than an hour.
South Australia. -- Yes, in the summer; but, especially as regards temperature,
rarely in the winter. One notable example occurred on February 9th, 1887, when
during a heavy thunder-storm the temperature fell 25¡ in 10 or 15 minutes,
followed by a rising temperature. In other instances the fall of temperature has
been almost equally rapid. From this it will be seen that we are subject to large
and quick falls of temperature following extreme heat. The approach of hot
weather is usually gradual, and the fall abrupt. The barometer has been known to
show a rise of 6/10 of an inch in 24 hours; this, however, is exceptional.
Queensland. -- There is no record of a fall of as much as 22¡ in 15 minutes. But,
on the other hand, a rise of 30¡ in three hours is a common feature over the
Darling Downs after sunrise. Owing to the diathermancy of the atmosphere
already referred to, it is a fact, nevertheless, that in the " continental " or inland
districts of Southern Queensland the temperature in winter is subject to sudden
and marked changes. Barometric pressure, owing to the comparatively low
latitude, is not exposed to sudden and marked changes, except during hurricane
conditions, which usually affect the central coast-line in February and March.
As a corollary to the preceding, would you say that the climate is
marked by great variability?
New South Wales. -- No; just the opposite. Indeed, as regards Sydney itself.
there are few cities in which so much uniformity of temperature and slow
changes, are to be found. The cause of any great change is the hot wind, and as
that seldom comes more than three or four times in the year, great changes are
infrequent. The mean diurnal range in Sydney is 11 1/2 ¡, and taking a series of
years it is very unusual for the range on any day to reach 25¡.
Victoria. -- No; because these are exceptional phenomena. In the late Spring and
during early summer the climate may be said to be occasionally subject to sharp
and sudden changes, which give it the character of variability. But the deviations
from mean temperature, except for short periods, are not remarkable.
South Australia. -- Yes, in summer; but not in winter.
Queensland. -- Certainly not; with the exception of the wide diurnal range of
temperature in winter in the southern "continental" districts, as at Cambooya and
Thargomindah. The changes are, according to my knowledge, far more sudden and
marked in the southern colonies (as during a "shift" from N.E. by W., to S.W. for
instance, at Melbourne, and especially at Adelaide) than in Queensland and its
coastal districts.
With regard to sustained, prolonged, or continued high temperatures during
the summer months, for how many days have you known the temperature
remain continuously at a high level? This is a very important question, as
it concerns infantile mortality in no small degree; I shall be grateful for
your experience?
New South Wales. -- Much depends upon what temperature is deemed a "high
level." If we assume that 90¡ and upwards is a high level, then such periods
are very rare in Sydney; in fact during the past 24 years there have only been
three. In 1868 there were three consecutive hot days of which the mean
temperature was 91.8¡; in 1870 a period of four days with a mean temperature of
91.3¡; and in 1874 a period of four days with a mean temperature of 90.2¡. Since
then, although sometimes near it, the temperature has never been for three days
over 90 ¡. Taking a lower level, we have one period of nine days in 1870, the
longest on record, during which the mean temperature was 82.6¡. It must,
however, be distinctly understood that what is here taken is not the mean
temperature of each 24 hours, but the highest temperature reached during the
day, and which would not as a rule last more than three or four hours, if so much.
If the mean temperature of the day were taken these temperatures, as given,
would have to be reduced at least 10 per cent.
Victoria. -- It is very unusual to have a hot period lasting more than three days;
when it does happen it is generally in February or March. In the majority of cases
high temperatures (over 90¡) do not last more than one or two days. The
exceptions generally occur in February or March, and have sometimes extended to
four or five days hot weather, with a temperature of over 80¡ with a maximum of
about 90¡, has on a few occasions during the last 30 years extended from five to
ten days; and in 1890, a memorable instance, to 12 days (the only case for 37
years).
South Australia. -- The longest stretch of continuous heat noted was in
January and February 1857. On January 28th, 29th, and 30th, the temperature
exceeded 100¡, and during the whole of February it was over 90¡ on 25 days, and
above 100¡ on 12 days, the mean being 107¡. In January 1858 there were 10
consecutive days over 90¡, of which eight consecutive days were over 100¡. In
January 1860 there were in the beginning of the month seven consecutive
days, above 100¡ (maximum 107.5¡). In the middle of the same month, seven days
were over 90¡, of which five exceeded 100¡, two days reaching 113.7¡. These are,
however, exceptions to our usual experience. Although there are several other
instances of great heat, yet the foregoing will suffice to show what we
occasionally suffer without much harm being done.
Queensland. -- During the period February 17th to February 23rd, 1891, the
shade temperature at Townsville ranged between 81¡ and 62¡, but at Cairns a
range between 82 ¡ and 70¡ is of frequent occurrence, within at least fortnightly
periods.
Any information with regard to humidity of the atmosphere also, will be of
great value. All physicians are of opinion that a high temperature,
combined with moisture, is very irritating to the lungs of those affected
with pulmonary disease.
Before setting forth the different answers in response to this, it will be desirable
to refer briefly to the term "humidity." The humidity of the atmosphere is defined
as the degree of its approach to saturation. Air completely saturated is
represented by 100, and that absolutely free of vapour by 0. As a matter of fact,
however, the latter never occurs; even in the driest regions of Arabia a humidity
of 10 per cent. is almost unknown. For its estimation the Wet and Dry Bulb
thermometers are employed. These consist of two ordinary thermometers. One
has its bulb exposed so as to register the temperature of the air. The bulb of the
other is covered with muslin; this latter material being kept wet through its
connection with a cotton wick dipping into a vessel of water. The water ascends
from this vessel by capillary attraction, spreads over the muslin, and evaporates
quickly or slowly, according to the dryness or moistness of the atmosphere.
Thus when the air is driest the difference between the two thermometers will be
greatest, and, on the contrary, when it is completely saturated with moisture the
two readings will be almost identical.
New South Wales. -- A considerable part of the colony, forming the western
plains, is subject to great heat, caused, no doubt, by the sun's great power on
treeless plains, and the almost total absence of cooling winds; yet, although in
summer the temperature here frequently rises over 100¡, and sometimes up to
120¡, owing to the cold at night and in winter the mean temperatures are not
greater than those of corresponding latitudes in the northern hemisphere. This
region of the colony is remarkably dry, and stock of all kinds thrive well and are
very free from disease. At Bourke, the driest place in the colony, the humidity for
a long series of years is -- in the spring 51¡, in the summer 49¡, in the autumn
61¡, and in the winter 74¡. At Sydney the humidity in the Spring is 69¡, in the
summer 70¡, in the autumn 79¡, and in the winter 79¡.
Victoria. -- The humidity of the air of Melbourne is low, the average being 71 per
cent. In the summer it falls to 65, and on hot days is generally very low. The
characteristic of our hot weather is that it is usually extremely dry; the
exceptions are very few, and occur in the late Spring and early autumn during
thundery, muggy weather. On the hottest days, with north winds, the dryness
makes the heat much more endurable, and the humidity frequently falls to
between 30 and 40 per cent.
South Australia. -- Attention has already been drawn to the fact that the hot,
dry air met with on the Adelaide plains is far more endurable than a lower
temperature in which the atmosphere is surcharged with aqueous vapour. A
damp atmosphere is a rare thing in South Australia during the summer, though in
March there are at times some warm and humid days. In the winter the air for the
most part is dry, although the nights are often damp. The Mount Lofty Ranges,
close to Adelaide, afford a cool retreat; they have a very large rainfall, in some
years over 50 inches. The climate at Mount Gambier, in the south-eastern part of
the colony, is cooler and damper; it has also a much heavier rainfall than the
Adelaide plains.
Of what duration are the different seasons, and to what months would
you apportion each season?
New South Wales and Victoria. -- Spring -- September, October, November;
Summer -- December, January, February; Autumn -- March, April, May; Winter --
June, July, August.
South Australia. -- Spring -- September, October; Summer comprises the five
months from November to March inclusive; Autumn -- April, May; Winter -- June,
July, August. Practically, in South Australia the year may be divided into two
seasons, namely, Spring, the seven months from April to October inclusive; and
Summer, the five months from November to March inclusive.
Queensland. -- With regard to Southern Queensland, the seasons may be
provisionally apportioned as follows: Spring -- August, September, October;
Summer -- November, December, January, February, Autumn -- March, April, May;
Winter -- June, July.
What are the prevailing winds, and what particular role do the hot winds
play?
New South Wales. -- A general statement is not sufficient, for the winds vary
much at different places; but taking the colony as a whole, its prevailing winds
come from some point between north-west and south-west, and hence the
dry climate. In Sydney no less than 39.6 per cent. of the wind comes from this
quarter. The winds known as southerly bursters are generally to be expected from
November to the end of February; they are always attended with strong electrical
excitement, a stream of sparks being sometimes produced for an hour at the
electrometer. The approach of the true burster is indicated by a peculiar roll of
clouds, which, when once seen, cannot be mistaken. It is just above the South
horizon, and extends on either side of it 15¡ or 20 ¡, and looks as if a thin sheet of
cloud were being rolled up like a scroll by the advancing wind. The change of wind is
sometimes very sudden; it may be fresh N.E. and in ten minutes a gale from S.
Hence vessels not on the look-out are sometimes caught unprepared, and suffer
accordingly. When a southerly wind commences anywhere south of Sydney it is at
once telegraphed to its principal coast towns, and a signal put up indicating its
approach. As to the hot winds, they are so insignificant in number that it cannot
be said they play any particular role. Their effect is to raise the temperature,
because they flow from the heated interior of Australia; but they do not last long.
and for the majority of people are dry, healthy winds. Indeed, they are by no
means so oppressive as the warm north-east wind, so charged with moisture,
which comes in the summer.
Victoria. -- In summer the N. winds blow to the extent of 8 per cent., the S.W.
winds 24.1 per cent., and the S. winds 201 per cent. Northerly, or warm-quarter
winds, in summer are 20 per cent., and southerly, or cool-quarter winds, 64 per
cent. The northerly winds in winter, however, are bleak and cold, like easterly
winds in England. The particular role played by the hot wind is to precede a
cyclonic movement, and is always in front of a low pressure area or
V-shaped depression. It is frequently followed by thunderstorms and rain of short
duration. It dries the surface and raises dust storms when strong. So far as its
effects on the people are concerned, it does not appear to hinder the ordinary
occupations of life. Some invalids are better during its continuance, some worse;
but all weakly people feel some depression after "the change" comes. The aged
are generally better in hot winds, unless they suffer from disease.
South Australia. -- As far as the southern regions of the colony are concerned,
we may say, speaking generally, that light winds and calms are a very distinctive
characteristic. The prevailing wind in the summer is the S.E., varied by
sea-breezes during the day. In the winter there are mostly dry, cold N.E. winds,
broken at intervals by westerly and S.W. gales of moderate strength, squalls, and
rain. The best and heaviest rainfalls are those which set in with the surface winds
at N.E., the rain increasing in intensity as the wind veers to N.W., and breaking up
into showers and squalls as it veers to S.W. In the interior, north of, say, latitude
30¡ to about 18¡S., the prevailing wind all the year is the S.E. North of latitude 18¡
to the north coast the country is well within the influence of the north-nest
monsoon during the summer months, with frequent thunderstorms and heavy
rains; and during, the winter dry S.E. winds prevail.
Queensland. -- Eastern Queensland (or rather the Pacific Slope) is very seldom
troubled with hot winds. The hot winds of "continental" Queensland are always
very dry, and are usually accompanied by dust storms.
A FEW introductory remarks on this subject will serve a useful purpose. It will be
seen that I have referred to the alphabetical pentagon of health -- which is purely
a provisional arrangement of my own. It consists of five headings, which fall
naturally into alphabetical order. They are best considered, therefore, in the
following way, namely:
(a) Ablution -- the Skin and the Bath.
(b) Bedroom Ventilation.
(c) Clothing.
(d) Diet.
(e) Exercise.
This is a convenient method of remembering the five great fundamental principles
concerned in the preservation of health. It will serve, moreover, as a means of
impressing them upon the memory, superior to any other with which I am
acquainted.
This very number five, indeed, has a more than ordinary significance belonging to
itself. It has been termed a mystical number. "Five," says Pythagoras, "has
peculiar force in expiations. It is everything. It stops the power of poisons and is
redoubted by evil spirits." According to the Pythagorean school of philosophy, the
world is a piece of harmony and man the full chord. The major chord consists of a
fundamental or tonic, its major third and its just fifth. The eighth note, or
complement of the octave, is the diapason of man. These are of course very
highly imaginative speculations. It is interesting to remember, however, that
the system of astronomy first taught by Pythagoras was afterwards developed
into the solar system by Copernicus, and is now received as the Copernican
system. But, turning from grave to gay, we find that five wits have been
described, viz., common sense, imagination, fantasy, estimation, and memory. Of
these, common sense passes judgment on all things; imagination brings the mind
to realise what comes before it; fantasy stimulates the mind to act; estimation
has to do with all that pertains to time, space, locality, etc.; and memory is "the
warder of the brain." Then again, have we not also the five senses of seeing,
hearing, feeling, smelling, and tasting? Have we not likewise five fingers and five
toes on either hand and foot? Moreover, is not fives an ancient and hollowed game,
still popular wherever the English language is spoken, and is not its name derived
from its being played with the "bunch of fives," namely the hand? And further,
there must be numbers of Australians who know well what "five-corners" are. In
addition to the foregoing, the number five has an important historical and legal
association in connection with the Code Napole'on. Prior to Napoleon's time,
different ways and customs prevailed in different parts of France, and altogether
legal matters were in a chaotic state. It was greatly to his credit, therefore that
he recognised the necessity for the entire alteration and remodelling of the whole
system. But what was more striking than the recognition of the existing, defects
was the speediness with which they were rectified, for the Code Napole'on was
devised and actually in operation between 1804 and 1810.
It consisted of five parts, namely the "Code Civil," dealing with the main body of
the private law; the "Code de Proce'dure Civile"; the "Code de Commerce," dealing
with the laws relating to commercial affairs; the "Code d'Instruction
Criminelle "; and finally, the "Code Penal." It is recorded that Napoleon was
prouder of this than of his victories. "I shall go down to posterity," he said, "with
my Code in my hand." The best proof of its excellence is that to-day it remains in
force as the law of France (though it has been re-christened the "Code Civil"
under the Republic), and that it has been the model for many Continental Codes,
notably Belgium, Italy, and Greece.
But, leaving, these references to the many associations attached to the number
five, it must not be supposed that my desire is to make people unnecessarily
timorous about themselves on the score of health. This is certainly not my
intention, for such a frame of mind would defeat the very object I have in view.
Yet there still remains the fact that a little rational attention is indispensable if
the vigour of the body is to be maintained at its best. There is a very great
difference between carefulness carried to extremes in this respect, on the one
head, and a heedlessness and total disregard of personal health, on the other. The
golden mean between these two is the proper knowledge of what is required for
the preservation of health, and so much conformity thereto as will give the best
results. And yet it must be remembered that no cast-iron code can be laid down
which would be applicable to one and all. No; idiosyncrasy, that personal peculiarity
which makes each individual different from every one else, is too potent a factor
to be ignored. In matters of this kind, each one, to a certain extent, is a law unto
himself, and, consequently, what agrees and what disagrees is only discoverable
by the individual concerned. In what follows, therefore, I have endeavoured to lay
down rules for guidance which will be beneficial to by far the greatest number;
although this element of the ego must never be forgotten.
IT has been estimated that the external skin of an ordinary adult is equal to an
area of about twelve square feet, and that in a tall man it may be as much as
eighteen square feet. There is a considerable difference between twelve square
feet and twelve feet square, and it is well to mention the fact in order that there
may be no confusion. From this large surface alone, therefore, it is quite easy to
see that the skin requires to have some attention paid to it. But it is really far
more important than even its extensive surface would be likely to indicate, for it
fulfils no less than seven different duties. In the first place it serves as an
external covering to the body, and, as we shall see also, the internal skin acts as a
support to the internal organs. Secondly, it is endowed with an extensive system
of nerves, which give rise to the sensations of touch, of temperature, of
pressure, and of pain. In this way we can tell whether a substance is rough or
smooth, and whether it is hot or cold; we recognise, moreover, the difference
between a gentle pressure of the hand and one so forcible as to cause pain.
Thirdly, the skin, as we shall find farther on, contains thousands of small tubes
for the purposes of perspiration, and besides this, there are other tubes
secreting, an oily substance. Fourthly, the skin plays an important part in
regulating the temperature of the body. Thus in a warm atmosphere the skin
becomes reddened and moist, and much heat is lost; on the other hand, when the
air is colder the skin becomes pale, cool, and dry, thus conserving the body heat.
Fifthly, the respiratory action of the skin must not be forgotten, although it
is nothing like so great as that of the lungs. Nevertheless quite an appreciable
amount of oxygen is absorbed through the skin, and beyond all question carbonic
acid is exhaled from it. Sixthly, it is an absorbent; that is to say, the skin is
capable of absorbing into the body certain substances applied to it. In this way
remedies are often introduced into the system by what is known as inunction. And
lastly, the skin is a great emunctory, and carries off waste matters from the
body. Accordingly it acts as a purifier of the blood, in which it assists the kidneys,
intestines, and the lungs. And more than this, it often happens that the turning
point in any disease is announced by a sudden, profuse, and markedly offensive
perspiration, as if a considerable amount of deleterious and noxious matter has
suddenly expelled from the system.
From the foregoing it is evident that the skin has many varied and important
duties to perform. As we might expect, moreover, an organ with such functions is
of complicated structure. Its component parts, therefore, deserve to have some
little attention paid to them, since the importance of the skin from a health point
of view will then be all the more appreciated. The skin is most conveniently
considered under three divisions -- the skin itself; the glands, producing
perspiration, oil, and hair, which are found within it; and the appendages belonging
to it, the hair and the nails. The skin itself may be described as the soft and
elastic tissue which invests the whole of the surface of the body, and consists of
two layers, the outer or scarf skin, and the deeper or true skin. The interior of
the body is likewise lined with a covering, which is termed mucous membrane, from
the fact that from its surface, or from certain special glands within it, or from
both, there is constantly being secreted a thin semi-transparent fluid called
mucus. At the various openings of the body, as the mouth, the nostrils, and
other parts, the external and internal skins are continuous with one another.
Indeed, at these apertures the mucous membrane, or internal skin, takes leave of
absence from the world to line the cavities within the body. So that, as Professor
Huxley expresses it, "every part of the body might be said to be contained within
the walls of a double bag, formed by the skin which invests the outside of the
body, and the mucous membrane, its continuation, which lines the internal
cavities."
The use of the scarf skin is manifestly to protect the more delicate true skin,
while at the same time it allows the waste products and used-up material to
escape from the body. In the substance of the true skin are thousands of minute
little bodies called papillae, which are specially concerned in the sense of touch,
for the vast majority of these papillae contain the end of a small nerve. The
numberless fine ridges seen on the palmar surface of the hands and fingers, and
on the soles of the feet, are really rows of these papillae, covered of course by
the layers of the outer skin. The supply of blood to the skin is also very plenteous,
each of its innumerable papillae being abundantly supplied in this respect. As a
proof of the amount of blood circulating within the skin, and of its extensive nerve
supply, it is only necessary to mention the fact that the finest needle cannot be
passed into it without drawing blood and inflicting-pain. In addition to the foregoing
the skin also contains a countless number of very fine tubes, which penetrate
through its layers and open on its surfaces by minute openings called pores. There
are altogether three different varieties of these tubes distributed throughout the
skin, namely, those intended for perspiration; secondly, those which lead from the
oil glands; and lastly, those which enclose each hair of the body. The first of
these, which carry away the perspiration from the body, are very fine, the end
away from the surface being coiled up in such a way as to form a ball or
oval-shaped body, constituting the perspiration gland. The tube itself is also
twisted like a corkscrew, and widens at its mouth. It is estimated that there are
between 2,000 and 3,000 of these perspiration tubes in every square inch of the
skin. Now, as we have already seen, the external skin of an ordinary adult is equal
to an area of about twelve square feet, and in a tall person it may be as much as
eighteen square feet. The number of these tubes, therefore, in the whole body will
be many hundreds of thousands, so that it will readily be seen how exceedingly
important it is that they should be kept in thorough working order by cleanliness.
The two great purposes fulfilled by the perspiration are the removal by its means
of worn-out or effete material which is injurious to the system, and the regulation
of the heat of the body by its influence. When it is stopped by any reason, such as
catarrh or disease, the skin fails in its work, and the noxious matters, instead of
being expelled from the body, are thrown back into the system. Hence there is a
good deal of truth in the belief that a freely acting skin is always a safeguard
against disease.
The second variety of tubes, those which furnish an oily-like fluid to the skin,
resemble in -- great part those which serve for the office of perspiration. At the
extremity away from the surface of the body, each one has a gland, the oil gland,
which secretes the oily material. The pores or outlets which open on the skin,
however, are a good deal larger than the similar orifices of the perspiratory
tubes, but they are not distributed so equally throughout the body. In certain
parts of the skin they are especially numerous, as on the nose, head, ears, and
back of the shoulders. The unctuous matter which is secreted by these oil glands
is intended to keep the skin moist and pliant, to prevent the too rapid evaporation
of moisture from the surface, and to act as a lubricant where the folds of
the skin are in contact with each other. At times in these oil tubes the contents
extend to the opening on its surface; the part in contact with the air then
becomes darkened, and forms the little black spots so frequently seen on the
face of some persons. The white, greasy matter which is thus contained within
the tubes can often be squeezed out with the fingers or a watch key, and on
account of its shape and black end is popularly supposed to be a grub or maggot.
The tube into which each hair of the body is inserted differs materially from the
two preceding, in that its function is more restricted. It serves to form a sort of
sheath which contains each hair, and is called the hair follicle. Usually one of the
last described ducts opens directly on the side of the hair follicle, and its
secretion serves the purpose of keeping the hair pliant. It will be more convenient,
however, to enter into a fuller description of the hair and hair follicle when be
come to speak of the hair, the nails, and the teeth.
Having thus gained some knowledge of the structure of the skin, and of its
delicate formation, it will be the more readily understood why strict attention to
the bath is necessary to produce a healthy frame. There is a continual new growth
of scarf skin going on, and there are likewise the secretions from the perspiration
ducts and oil tubes being poured forth. The outer skin which has served its
purpose is being incessantly cast off in the - form of whitish looking powder, but
instead of being thrown clear from the body it clings to it and becomes entangled
with the perspiration and oily material, thus forming an impediment to the free
action of the skin. If the pores of the latter be obstructed and occluded in this
manner, the impurities which should be removed from the system cannot escape,
and have therefore to be expelled by some other channel. Hence the work of
removing this impure and deleterious material is thrown upon the liver,
bowels, or kidneys, and often results in their disease. In our warm climate, where
the skin acts more freely than it does in colder latitudes, the use of the bath is
certainly indispensable, if the health of the body is to be maintained at all.
The cold bath, at any rate during the summer months, should always be there
before breakfast, but in the cooler part of the year the shock may be lessened, if
it be desirable, by using tepid water instead of cold. And since there is, as we have
seen, a good deal of oily matter excreted by the skin, it becomes necessary to
use something in addition to water for cleansing purposes, for the latter is unable
to displace the greasy collection by itself. The only thing which will render it easy
of removal is soap, as by its action it softens the oily material and dislodges it
from the skin. Soap has acquired an evil reputation which it certainly does not
deserve, and if it disagrees it is either due to the fact of its being an inferior
article, or else the skin itself must be at fault. The best soap to use is the white,
not the mottled, Castile, as it is made from pure olive oil. By the proper and
judicious use of soap the skin is kept soft and natural, and the complexion is
maintained in the hue of health.
Even in the matter of washing the face, there is a right way and a wrong way of
doing it. The basin should be moderately filled with water and the face dipped into
it, and then the hands. The latter are to be next well lathered with soap, and
gently rubbed all over the face, following into the different depressions, such as
the inner corners of the eyes and behind the ears. It is quite a mistake, however,
to apply the lather to the inside of the ears, as it seems to favour the formation
of wax; the different depressions and canal of the ears can be very well cleaned
by means of the finger tips moistened with water. The face is then to be dipped
into the water a second time and thoroughly rinsed, but it is better to pour
away the soapy water for the rinsing. Many people apply the soap to the face by
means of a sponge or bit of flannel, and do not wash the soap thoroughly off with
fresh water before drying with a towel. The hands unquestionably make the
softest and most delicate means of bringing the lather completely into contact
with the surface of the skin and, besides this, the amount of pressure to be
applied can also be regulated to a nicety. The face and neck should always be
carefully and thoroughly dried by means of a suitable towel. But for the ears
something of a softer material, such as a clean handkerchief, is more convenient
in following out the various hollows and the canal itself.
Many houses, and fairly sized houses too, are destitute of a bath, and if there is
no room for the erection of one, or if the means for having it built are not
forthcoming, it becomes necessary to see what cheap and efficient substitute
can be made. A sponge bath, or large tub, with a bucket of water and a good-sized
sponge, can readily be obtained, even in the most humble dwelling, and answers as
well as can be wished. When the body is simply sponged over with tepid water it
makes one of the mildest baths that can be taken; but those who are in ordinary
health can well lather them selves over with soap and cold water, and then wash it
off with some squeezes of the sponge copiously wetted with the water.
Next in order to the sponge bath comes the plunge bath, and with either of them
the face should always be washed first, in the manner previously directed, so as
to prevent a rush of blood to the head. In taking a bath, whether it be the sponge
or the plunge bath, plenty of water should always be dashed over the front of the
chest, for it makes one hardier and less susceptible to the effects of cold. In
fact, besides acting as a preventive to attacks of common cold, it really
strengthens the lungs, and renders the body more capable of resisting
disease. If in addition a little cold water is habitually sniffed up the nostrils at the
time of taking the bath it will have many a cold in the head. After coming out of
the bath the towels should always be used to thoroughly dry the body, and it is
certainly better to have two for the purpose. The two towels should be
sufficiently large in size, at least five feet in length and of ample width; anything
smaller is altogether useless. One of them should be of some soft absorbing
material so as to thoroughly dry the body, while the other should be rougher, to
use with friction to the skin. In fact, this rubbing down with the rougher towel is in
some respects the most important part of the bath, and there should always be
enough friction to get the skin into a glow. If there is not this feeling of reaction,
but a decided chilliness, it is a sure sign that the bath is not agreeing, and one with
tepid water must be substituted, or else it will have to be stopped altogether for a
time.
But although there may be a certain proportion of people whom the cold bath does
not benefit, yet I am fully convinced that the number is comparatively speaking
small. A good many make the excuse that they cannot take it, while all the time
laziness is the real trouble. Once the advantages derived from the cold bath are
experienced, all the objections raised vanish into thin air. Not only is there that
feeling of exhilaration which abides with those who habitually employ it, but it is to
be remembered that its greatest value consists in the immunity which it confers
against diseases of the catarrhal type. The effect of the cold bath is to give tone
to the whole system, and to brace up the body. But it does more than this; by
maintaining the functional activity of the skin, the liability to catch cold is greatly
lessened. There are many explanations given of the phenomena which occur in
"taking cold." They are believed, however, to arise from a disturbance of the
heat-producing forces of the body. As it has been already pointed out, the skin is
the great temperature-regulator of the body. Accordingly this latter all-important
duty is best promoted by keeping the functional activity of the skin in full swing.
The prevention of catarrh means, therefore, a healthy action of the skin, and for
this nothing is so good as the daily cold bath. The praises of the latter are well
sung in the following extract: "Those who desire to pass the short time of life in
good health ought often to use cold bathing, for I call scarce express in words how
much benefit may be had by cold baths; for they who use them, although almost
spent with old age, have a strong and compact pulse and a florid colour in their
face, they are very active and strong, their appetite and digestion are vigorous,
their senses are perfect and exact, and, in one word, they have all their natural
actions well performed."
The beneficial effects which follow the daily cold bath have been thus dwelt upon
because I believe that in Australia the greatest good to the greatest number
would follow its use. At the same time, however, it is necessary to remember that
there are some persons, and some even apparently robust persons, who can never
take them. Such baths, also, are injurious to those who are pale and bloodless, or
those who suffer from a tendency to congestion of the internal organs --
excepting under medical advice. And, in addition, it must also be remembered that
warm baths have claims for consideration from a cleansing point of view, and a
few words upon them in this respect will not be thrown away. Now, the daily use of
the cold bath, together with the assiduous application of soap, may be sufficient
to keep the skin cleansed from impurities. Yet as a matter of fact this will the
more certainly be ensured by a weekly - or, better still, bi-weekly -- warm
cleansing bath. The best time to take it is before bedtime, so that there is no risk
of taking a chill afterwards. After the body has been well lathered over with
soap, and this has been thoroughly washed off, the cleansing process may be then
considered as completed. It is next recommended that two handsful of common
salt should be added to the warm water, and the body steeped therein for a
minute or two. The particles of salt pass into the skin so firmly that they cannot
be removed even by the most vigorous rubbing. In this way the functions of the
skin are stimulated to a considerable degree; the process of nutrition throughout
the body greatly promoted; and the liver roused to action. From this it is easy to
understand why hot sea-water baths are so beneficial.
There is another effect of the warm bath which deserves to be well remembered,
for it has an historical association. It is related of the great Napoleon, that after
a day's fighting, instead of indulging in a night's rest, he would take a warm bath.
It was so efficacious that he was enabled to begin his exertions almost
immediately. The explanation of this lies in the fact that when the mascles are
tired out and the vigour of the body diminished, the hot bath rouses the
circulation and renews the worn-out tissues. In the same way, after a night's
dancing, twenty minutes or so in a warm bath, and a couple of hours' sleep, will be
almost as good as a whole night's rest. In addition to the foregoing, however, it
must not be forgotten that the warm bath, or to speak more correctly the hot
bath, is a true medicinal agent. It is used in many cases of disease, especially
those in which the skin is inactive. A feverish cold is often nipped in the bud by a
hot bath at bedtime; a free perspiration usually follows, and thus relief is
obtained. In some forms of rheumatism and gout, too, the hot bath is of signal
benefit. There are many cases of a spasmodic nature, also, in which it is of great
value. At the same time it must be borne in mind that the hot bath, when used to
an excess, tends to induce a debilitated condition.
THE HAIR.
The loss of hair is so frequent in Australia, at least amongst the male population,
that it requires a little consideration; and apart altogether from this, the whole
subject is one of extreme interest, so that some reference to the actual
structure of the hair and the hair-follicles is called for. The roots of the hair are
formed in the hair-follicles, which may be described as little pear-shaped bags,
formed either in the true skin or in the cellular tissue beneath it. Each hair-follicle,
hair-sac, or hair-pit, as it is variously termed, bulges out at its deeper part,
contracting to a long narrow neck as it passes to its skin. Near the surface of the
latter the follicle widens out again, and it is from this part that the hair emerges.
As it has been previously mentioned, a duct from one of the oil glands usually
opens into each follicle. At its very bottom, also, is the papillae or little mound-like
elevation. This protrudes into the follicle, and from it the hair is formed.
The blood supply for the hair is very abundant. There is a complete system of
blood vessels encircling every one of the follicles, and besides this each papilla has
a special distribution of blood to itself. That part of the hair lying within the
hair-follicle is called the root. The lower end of the root, which swells out into a
knob, named the bulb, is concave in shape underneath, so as to fit on top of the
projecting papilla. The shaft is the long stem of the hair, while its extreme end is
termed the point.
By the aid of the microscope it may be seen that the hair itself on the outside is
covered by a layer of scales -- the cuticle - overlapping one another like the tiles
on the roof of a house. Beneath the cuticle is the fibrous part, consisting of
many cells closely packed together. In many instances the fibrous part takes up
the whole interior, but in the centre of the coarser hair there is the medulla or
pith, composed of very minute cells. From this it follows that the hair is not a
narrow tube, as is commonly supposed. This mistake has arisen from the fact
that, when viewed transversely, the colour of the central and outer part of the
hair is different.
Having in this way become acquainted with the actual structure of the hair and of
the hair-follicles, it will be desirable to consider somewhat briefly the management
of the former. We have already seen that the skin requires a good deal of
attention in order to ensure the perfection of bodily health. And although the hair
does not fulfil such an important function, yet, on the other hand, it must not be
neglected. Even on the score of appearance alone, it has much claim for attention.
Many people would be vastly improved in this way were they only to visit their
hairdresser more frequently. It is very unsightly, to say the least of it, to see the
hair straggling all over the back and sides of the neck, and the beard (if a beard be
worn) with a wild, untidy look. Besides this, in our semi-tropical climate, a little
more care in this respect would be certainly conducive to coolness and comfort.
But in addition to these considerations, there is another very cogent reason why
the hair should be more often attended to; and it is the fact that if it be kept of
an ordinary length, somewhat frequent cutting promotes its growth. There is
more than one reason given as an explanation of this; indeed, there are at least
three. In the first place, the shorter the hair the less it is dragged on in its roots;
secondly, its roots are prevented from becoming blocked at the mouth of the
hair-follicles -- and lastly, the weight of the hair is considerably lessened. From
this it will be obvious that it is not the actual cutting of the hair in itself
which is so beneficial in invigorating its growth, but that, by reason of the cutting,
certain results follow which strengthen it greatly.
We have just seen that the accumulations of debris and other material at the
roots of the hair are prejudicial to its growth. It must not be inferred from this,
however, that incessant washing of the scalp, by removing these collections, is a
good thing. Now, it is advised by some that the hair should be wetted daily at the
same time the bath is taken. But as a general rule this is a mistake; only those
who have a superabundance of natural oil can afford to carry out such a practice.
With the great majority of people it is absolutely detrimental to the growth of the
hair to wash it oftener than once a week. After washing the head, the hair should
be thoroughly dried. Many attacks of neuralgia, especially in the fair sex, are due
to the effect of getting into a draught while the hair is still wet.
There are several points to be borne in mind in connection with the growth and
preservation of the hair. With many persons the scalp is very tender and will not
tolerate vigorous brushing. In such instances the brush should always be a soft
one; indeed, a hard brush cannot be recommended under any circumstances. The
teeth of the comb, also, should never be so sharp as to irritate the scalp, nor
should they be set too closely together. A certain amount of brushing is
necessary to keep the scalp and hair in healthy action, but it must never be
carried to excess. Singeing the hair is greatly believed in by a number of people,
and in some cases it appears to be of benefit. Many believe that singeing seals up
the cut ends of the hair, which they affirm bleed when cut. This has no foundation
in fact, however, for, as it has already been explained, the hair is not a tube. A
hard, unyielding covering for the head is not at all suitable; the lighter and
more ventilated the head-gear the better. But, the truth is, a sensible and suitable
head-covering for Australian use has yet to be devised. Thinning of the hair, and
even actual baldness, are not unfrequently started by the hard rim of the hat
employed. This mechanically interferes with the supply of blood to the scalp, and
thus it is that the crown suffers most in this respect, since it is the more
starved of blood.
As I have previously shown, the hair often suffers from want of natural oil. The
investigations of Liebreich have shown that this is closely allied to lanolin, which is
the purified fat of sheep's wool. Moreover, it has been found that this lanolin is
the very best substitute for the former. It is, however, too sticky to be used
alone as a pomade. Accordingly, Dr. Allan Jamieson, of Edinburgh, a very high
authority on diseases of the skin and hair, advises that it should be mixed with oil
of sesame in the following proportions:
Oil of sesame....
1 drachm.
Lanolin.....
2 ounces.
This may be conveniently perfumed with a few drops of oil of bergamot, oil of
orange blossom, or oil of rosemary. For the preservation of the hair, therefore, it
should be trimmed short; the scalp kept clean, but not overwashed; and the hair,
if naturally dry, lubricated by the foregoing pomade. These must be supplemented,
also, by taking care that the head-covering is not too heating, that the rim of the
hat is not too hard, and that irritation of the scalp by hard brushes and fine
combs is strictly avoided.
If the thinning of the hair has progressed to a more advanced stage, other
measures will have to be adopted. The most useful application which I know of to
restore growth is the following. It is a formula given by Messrs. Squire, the
well-known chemists of London, and has had an immense sale extending over many
years.
Cantharidine (the best)
1 grain.
Acetic ether
6 drachms.
These are to be dissolved together; then add;
Rectified spirit
..
3 ounces.
Castor oil
..
1 ounce.
As with the pomade, this is best perfumed by the addition of about 20 or 30 drops
of oil of bergamot, oil of lavender, oil of orange flower, or oil of rosemary, as
fancy dictates. The bottle should be kept tightly corked, and a little of the
preparation rubbed well into the hair-roots daily. If it create any irritation after
two or three days' use, it is best to wash the scalp with a little warm water and
soap. The pomade which has been recommended may be afterwards employed for
two or three days till the irritation has subsided, when the application may be
renewed. A better plan still is, from the first, to use the hair restorer on one day,
and the pomade on the next, alternately. This foregoing application is of course
not infallible, but it will be found to do more good in a greater number of cases
than any known preparation.
THE NAILS
From the fact that the nails are in reality appendages of the skin, they are
naturally entitled to some brief consideration. Beneath the nail is the matrix, that
part of the true skin from which the nail is formed. The matrix has not a perfectly
smooth surface, but is arranged in 8 scries of parallel ridges with alternating
grooves. The nail is of a rosy pink colour, because it is transparent enough to let
the blood, circulating beneath, be seen through it. Near the root is a little
crescentric-shaped white portion called the lunula. The growth of the nail takes
place from below. It cannot grow backwards, since it is confined in a groove. But
as the fresh cells form they gradually thrust the whole nail forward, till at last it
requires paring. As a matter of fact, however, the nails really require more
attention than they usually receive. The finger nails should be trimmed into a bow
shape, and the corners rounded off, while the skin near the root of the nail, which
tends to grow over the lunula, should be repressed into position by means of any
suitable appliance. On the contrary, those of the feet should be cut squarish in
shape, with a hollowed-out centre, so as to prevent the nail from ingrowing.
THE TEETH
It is not my purpose to enter fully into all the details concerning the teeth, but
there are one or two matters of great importance connected with them which
require a few words. There are many people, beginning to get on in years, perhaps,
who have had the misfortune to lose many of their teeth. The first thing that
happens is an inability to masticate their food; and, before long, indigestion sets
in, with all the evils attendant on its train. These unfortunates know that they
have indigestion; the pain and discomfort after food tell them that. They do not
know, however, that all their sufferings arise solely from their want of teeth.
They begin to lose flesh, and get altogether in a bad way. But if they can be
induced to apply to a competent and skilful dental surgeon, they are properly
fitted with what they require, and the consequence is their sufferings almost
immediately cease. They begin to enjoy their food, and before long their whole
appearance is transformed into one of health. In the opinion of all dental
authorities, when the natural teeth are lost, artificial substitutes unquestionably
conduce to health and comfort.
It is quite deplorable to see what little interest people take in the
preservation of their teeth; even those who should know better are in too many
instances quite as neglectful. But the teeth play a very important part in the
thorough division of food, and if this be not ensured the health is bound to suffer.
They should be kept scrupulously clean, therefore, and the formation of tartar
prevented.
These two objects are best accomplished by their thorough cleansing with a
moderately stiff brush. Too soft a brush is insufficient for the purposes of
removing the accumulations which collect upon the teeth. A tooth-powder or
dentifrice of some kind will also be required. One of the simplest, and possibly also
one of the very best, is composed of the following:
Powdered borax
..
1/2 an ounce.
Powdered orris root
..
1 ounce.
Powdered white Castile soap
..
1/4 of an ounce.
Precipitated chalk
..
3 ounces.
Oil of cloves
..
2 drops.
Oil of winter green
..
1/2 an ounce.
This leaves nothing to be desired, and will be found satisfactory in every respect.
It is customary to dip the tooth-brush into water, so as the better to enable it to
take up the dentifrice. But it will be found an advantage if, after dipping the brush
into water, it then be rubbed once or twice over a piece of white Castile soap. It
will by this means pick up a larger amount of the powder. The teeth should be
attended to after each meal, although cleansing them the last thing at night is an
important duty, never on any account to be neglected. It must not be imagined,
however, that even the foregoing is sufficient. Particles of food, which the brush
fails to remove, collect between the teeth, and, if allowed to remain, ultimately
lead on to decay. This is most likely to occur when the teeth are crowded
close together in the jaw. But under all circumstances, whether the teeth be
closely set together, or whether they be more widely apart, a piece of floss silk
should be passed between them daily, so as to remove any adherent particles, and
at the same time to thoroughly cleanse the sides of the teeth.
Now, if all houses were built in accordance with the requirements of modern
sanitary ideas, there would be but little difficulty in grappling with the problem of
bedroom ventilation, for the sleeping apartment would be a well ventilated room,
with all the latest contrivances, such as Tobin's ventilators, for the admission of
fresh air. But as the greater number of people have to live in rented dwellings in
which the rooms are very small, it becomes necessary to know what can be done
to remedy existing defects. In the first place the bedroom should always be
upstairs if possible; it is decidedly healthier, and there is a better chance for the
supply of fresh air. The very worst room in the house that could be chosen for a
sleeping apartment would be one on the basement. Then again, a fireplace in the
bedroom is a priceless boon, and it is almost impossible to rectify such a
deficiency. But as too many rooms are built without it, we are compelled to look to
the window for our air supply. It is estimated that nearly one-third of every
person's life is devoted to sleep; that is to say, about one-third of it is spent in
the sleeping apartment. It is only natural, then, that this room and its
surroundings should merit some special attention. As a matter of fact, from a
health point of view, it should receive more consideration than all the rest of the
house put together, for during our waking hours; we are moving about and
constantly changing our location; but during sleep, when life is in abeyance to a
certain extent, the system has passively to receive and be supported by
whatever pure air the bedroom happens to possess. If, as too often is the case,
that chamber is looked upon as a sort of cupboard, where, amongst other things,
there is room for a bed, so much the worse for any one who has to sleep there. If
the sleeper arises in the morning in a dazed and semi-suffocated state and quite
unfitted for the day's work before him, instead of feeling refreshed, there is no
occasion to seek far for the cause. For the mental toiler, also, it is equally
important that the period devoted to the restoration of brain material and the
imbibition of a fresh supply of nerve power for the ensuing day's requirements
should be passed under circumstances the most favourable for bestowing them.
From this we see that a due amount of sleep, under favourable circumstances as
regards ventilation, is necessary both for brain and muscle; and that, in fact,
unless it be forthcoming, there will be an inability for either brain worker or
muscle user to properly fulfil his duties next day. But in addition to this there is
still the fact that we have to do with the semi-tropical climate of Australia. It will
be as well, therefore, to make reference to what has been said on the subject as
far as India is concerned. Sir Joseph Fayrer, whose opinion on such matters must
always carry respect, in the course of an address on the preservation of health in
that country, went on to say: "It is very important that you have good sleep, for
nothing in the hot weather more refreshes or invigorates you. Early rising is the
rule in India, and I advise you to conform to the usual practice."
Sir James Ranald Martin, another authority on Indian affairs, in commenting on the
prevention of disease, also calls attention to the need for extra sleep, which is
always required in hot climates. He points out that by giving the frame a thorough
and complete rest from the great stimulus of heat, both tone and vigour
are imparted - providing for the requirements of the coming day, as well as
repairing those of the preceding. The general truths contained in the foregoing
apply equally to Australia, and during the hot summer months, therefore, it must
not be forgotten that an extra allowance of sleep is quite indispensable.
In a great many cases the space under the bed is regarded as an admirable
receptacle for a collection of boxes, parcels, hat-boxes, old boots, and other
interesting relics, while they are effectually concealed from view by a species of
curtain reaching from the bed to the floor. The drapery which thus hangs down is
dignified by the name of a "valance," and though originally intended for the
purpose of embellishment and ornamentation, it is better that decorative art
should be more limited in its application, so as not to interfere with the free
circulation of air throughout the room. The sleeping apartment is also considered
as being particularly well adapted for the storage of old clothes, and consequently
garments of this description are not hidden away, nor furtively concealed, but are
triumphantly exposed to gaze in various parts of the room. Indeed, the more
obtrusive they are, the better the purpose of the bedroom is believed to be
served. If it could be only understood how these unnecessarily occupy the air
space of the room, and interfere with its ventilation, this sort of thing would
never be tolerated for a moment.
And while on the subject of the accumulation of useless articles in a bedroom, it
seems fitting here to devote a few words to another kindred matter, namely, the
hoarding up throughout the house of what may literally be designated as lumber. It
is astonishing what a number of utterly valueless things are allowed to remain in
nearly every household, and it is well remarked that no one ever knows what
a collection of rubbish he possesses till he has occasion to remove. There may not
be much to be ashamed of in the first load or two of furniture, but at the latter
end there is a strong feeling that a dark night would be more adapted for moving -
the darker the better. At least every twelve months there should be a regular
clearance of worn-out articles, and that miscellaneous collection of odds and ends
which can be of no earthly value to anybody, unless he be an antiquary.
Let us now go on to consider what ill effects result from the breathing of vitiated
air. In his work, A Manual of Practical Hygiene, Professor Edmund A. Parkes has
pointed out: "When air moderately vitiated by respiration is breathed for any
period and continuously, its effects become complicated with those of other
conditions. But allowing the fullest effect to all other agencies, there is no doubt
that the breathing of the vitiated atmosphere of respiration has a most injurious
result on the health. The aeration and nutrition of the blood seems to be
interfered with, and the general tone of the system falls below par. Of special
diseases it appears pretty clear that affections of the lungs are more common."
The volume of air inhaled and exhaled by the adult in the twenty-four hours
averages 360 cubic feet, or 2,000 gallons, while the amount we take in the shape
of liquid or solid food does not amount probably to more than 5 1/2 pints, which is
equal to only 1-3000th part of the volume of air passed through the lungs. From
this it will be seen how necessary it is that such a large amount of air should be
perfectly fresh and wholesome, for the lungs act as a pair of immense sponges or
absorbers. When the ventilation does not allow of a continuous supply of fresh air
it smells close, and is surcharged with an increased amount of carbonic acid, while
the noxious exhalations from the breath and lungs deposit themselves throughout
the room. Nor are the ill-effects of impure air confined to man alone, for it is well
known that cows, horses, sheep, and other animals, when penned up in close
quarters, show an increased death-rate from many diseases.
But though it is perfectly plain that badly ventilated sleeping apartments tend
greatly to the production of diseases of the lungs, it is not generally understood
by the greater number of persons that diseases of the heart are brought on by
similar conditions, and there is without doubt a great increase of heart diseases
at the present time. It is estimated that upwards of 10,000 people in England
alone die yearly from affections of the heart; yet, taking into consideration the
ceaseless work of that organ (in the words of the motto upon Goethe's ring,
"Ohne Rast" -- without rest), it is wonderful that it is not more frequently
diseased. It is said that "the heart is a small muscular organ weighing only a few
ounces, beating perpetually day and night, morning and evening, summer and
winter; and yet often an old man's heart nearly a hundred years of age is as
perfect and complete as when he was a young man of twenty" (Haughton).
The effect of impure air in its action on the heart is thus spoken of by Dr.
Cornelius Black: "I showed the effect of impure air in promoting the degenerative
tendency in the structures of the heart, and especially those of the right side of
the heart, after the age of forty. I was then led to a passing consideration of the
baneful influence produced upon the heart by badly-ventilated houses, schools,
manufactories, pits, theatres, underground railways, and all places of a similar
character." "The impure atmosphere of the bedrooms of the poor, and indeed of
many of the middle class, caused by deficient ventilation, proves a sharp spur to
the degenerative tendency manifested by the heart, and especially by the
right side of the heart, after the age of forty." "I hold that the breathing of
impure air is a fruitful source of disease of the right side of the heart occurring
after middle age. How many people ignorantly favour its occurrence by confining
themselves to closely shut, non-ventilated, stuffy, sitting rooms, in which the
carbonic acid has accumulated to a poisonous degree in the air they respire! How
are these evil results to be prevented? The simple answer is, let the rooms in
which you live be effectively ventilated by an incoming current of fresh air, and so
arranged that no draught shall be felt."
Sanitarians who have devoted a good deal of time and study to the working out of
questions relating to the amount of fresh air in bedrooms have decided that each
person should, if possible, have at least 1,000 cubic feet of space, or in other
words, the same amount contained in a room 10 feet long, 10 feet wide, and 10
feet high. It is also estimated that the amount of fresh air entering into a room of
this size should be 3,000 cubic feet per hour, that is, the air in each room should
be completely changed three times every hour. These observations of course
apply only to the least amount of air which every sleeper is strictly entitled to. As
a matter of fact, however, any more than this is simply of distinct advantage as
far as health is concerned. The bedroom, instead of being the smallest room in the
house, as it too often is, should be really the very largest. Now it has been
previously stated that foul or vitiated air collects in a sleeping apartment unless
there be a continuous circulation of fresh air; and that the noxious exhalations
from the breath and skin constitute the chief sources of air pollution. The
practical point to discover is how to have this continuous circulation of
fresh air throughout the room without causing a draught. Before considering this,
a few words on the position of the bed itself will possibly be appropriate. It is
always better to have it standing more in the centre of the room with its head
against the wall, than to have it jammed alongside the latter. And it certainly
should have placed north and south if the shape of the room admits of it. The
wire-wove mattress is of great advantage both for comfort and for coolness; and
here in Australia, during the summer months, proper mosquito nettings are as
necessary as the bed itself. If the bed is provided with a head-piece, as it should
be, there is no difficulty in fitting on the netting.
Every bedroom window should be made to open freely, and what other defects
exist -- such as the smallness of the apartment, or the absence of a fireplace --
can be remedied to a great extent by means of the window. In many instances the
bed is placed so near the latter that when it is open there is a strong draught
playing directly on the bed, and this is an evil which must be avoided. In such case,
to rectify matters, raise the bottom window a few inches, and have a piece of
board made to fit in under it, so as to support the sash and fill in the space
between it and the sill. The air freely enters the room between the two sashes,
because the top of the lower sash is by this contrivance raised above the lower
part of the upper one. Another great advantage is that the air is directed upwards
to the ceiling by having to come in over the lower sash, and thus a gentle current
of fresh air is constantly being circulated throughout the room without creating
any draught. There are other devices to attain the same end, such as having
apertures cut in the glass of the windows, but they are not so effective, so
inexpensive, nor so simple as the preceding. In bedrooms there are the long
French windows leading on to a balcony, and where such is the case the air current
can be regulated to a nicety by having only one of the window-doors open, and
directing the ventilation away from the bed. Many people prefer to sleep with the
door itself open, and by having a portiere or certain suspended outside, privacy
can be ensured, while an upright screen standing at the head of the bed will
effectually ward off any cold currents of air. In our summer weather there is but
little difficulty experienced in regulating the air supply, for there is generally a
desire to have as much fresh air as possible. Far too many people, however, look
upon the bedroom in the light of an oven, where they are to be baked during the
hours of repose, and this is the case even during the summer. In the cooler parts
of the year they are apt to forget there is just as much necessity for fresh air as
in the warm months.
Soiled or dirty clothes should not on any account be allowed to remain in the
sleeping apartments, as they are a constant source of foulness to the air. All
unclean linen ready for the wash had better be kept away from the bedroom in one
of those long baskets which stand upright and are furnished with a lid. They are
admirably adapted for the purpose, and may be obtained for a few shillings from
any of the institutions for the blind, where they are made by the inmates. A word
of advice, by the way, to those about to travel on a long voyage, is never to
forget one of those canvas bags for the soiled clothes: they are invaluable at sea.
IT is worth considering somewhat minutely what are the requisites of perfect
clothing, and what properties our different kinds of wearing apparel possess.
Without doubt any reflection on the question of what is usually worn and what
ought to be worn is not only of considerable interest generally, but of great
moment likewise from a health point of view. It cannot be maintained too strongly
that the question of the proper material for a suitable covering for the body
takes a footing nearly equal to the very important one of diet itself. Now, there is
no form of clothing which on its own account creates heat, or has the property of
bestowing warmth upon the body, but the difference in it consists in its power of
preventing the escape of the body heat. These qualities in the different varieties
of wearing apparel will depend to a great extent upon the thickness of the
materials, and also upon the varying power which they possess in detaining air
within their meshes. It is this latter property of retaining the air, which is warmed
by contact with the body, in their interstices, which constitutes the great
difference in the various clothing materials. This is also an explanation of the
well-known fact that loose garments are always warmer than tightly fitting ones,
for in the former there is the layer of warm air in contact with the body, which
has no opportunity for existing in the latter. In the same way two or three layers
of under-garments will always be warmer than a single one, equal to their
combined thickness, since there is a separate layer of air between each of the
thinner ones.
All the differences in the various fabrics are due in chief part to the
properties of heat. The ordinary or normal temperature of the human body is
between 98¡ and 99 ¡ Fahrenheit, while that of the air will vary considerably,
according to the climate and locality. Each individual, therefore, must be regarded
as a material, though living, object which is enveloped in a surrounding
atmosphere. As such, heat will conform to certain fixed laws in its relations to the
two bodies. It is always a definite fact that when two bodies in contact with each
other are of different temperatures, they tend to become of equal temperature.
The warmer will part with its heat to the cooler, and the latter will in like manner
reduce the temperature of the former. By covering, then, the surface of the
body, it is prevented from giving its heat directly to the air, for the clothes
intercept it by absorbing the heat themselves.
In the second place the clothes prevent a too rapid escape of heat from the body,
and by keeping a layer of warm air in contact with the skin, they preserve the
body heat. Again, the various materials used to clothe the body vary much as to
the readiness with which they conduct heat; accordingly we speak of good and bad
conductors of heat. A bad conductor, such as wool, will keep the heat of the body
from escaping to the sir, and thus forms warm clothing, while a good conductor
like cotton will lead away the heat quickly and prove cooler.
As said before, the texture of the material - that is, the size of its meshes -
which allows air to pass more or less freely through it, also exercises a greater
effect upon clothing. No healthy clothing is absolutely air-proof, the access of the
air through it being necessary to our health and comfort. Thus oil-skin and
mackintosh, which are air-tight as well as water-tight, make most people feel very
uncomfortable.
In addition to their texture or permeability to air, and to their conducting or
non-contracting powers, fabrics also vary according to their hygroscopic qualities.
By hygroscopic is meant the power of absorbing moisture; thus a thin flannel is
one of the coolest materials we can have, for it absorbs perspiration; while linen,
which is non-hydroscopic, when moist allows the fluid to evaporate rapidly, and
thus cools the body too quickly, and therefore dangerously. Hence flannel is a
most suitable fabric in which to take exercise, as there is less danger of taking a
chill.
There are four chief materials to be considered in connection with clothing,
namely - cotton and linen, which belong to the vegetable kingdom, and silk and
wool, which are obtained from the animal world. These four, either in their own
form or else in combination with each other, such as merino, constitute most of
our wearing apparel. Cotton is the fine, soft, downy material of a hairy nature
which is found on the seeds of a certain plant, the cotton plant, which belongs to
the mallow family. Its fibres are flattened in shape, and are twisted at intervals.
The form of the fibres has an important effect in the action of cotton material on
the skin. Being of a flattened shape, they have sharp edges, which in delicate skins
are apt to cause irritation. Cotton wears well, it is not absorbent of moisture
nearly to the same extent as linen, nor does it conduct away the heat of the body
so quickly as the latter, hence it is a warmer material than linen. On the other
hand, it does not retain the heat against the body like wool, and is an appropriate
material for dress in hot climates. In merino there is a mixture of about one-fifth
to one-half part of wool with cotton.
Linen, the other product of the vegetable kingdom, is obtained from the fibres of
the common flax. Its fibres, unlike those of other fabrics, are distinguished
by their roundness and their freedom from stiffness. These properties give to it
that peculiar softness which makes it so agreeable to the feel, and comforting
and soothing to the skin. But, on the other hand, it has certain characters which
are a drawback. As was stated before, it differs from cotton in that it is cooler,
but unfortunately it absorbs moisture from the body quickly, and becomes
saturated with perspiration. This is removed so quickly by the action of the
external air, causing rapid evaporation, that there is great danger of a chill.
The next material in alphabetical order is silk, and it is also the first product of
the animal world to be considered. As is well known, it is obtained from the cocoon
of the silk-worm. The fibres of this material are round in shape like those of linen,
and they are even softer than the latter. On this account the phrase "as soft as
silk" has passed into a saying. It is softer to the feel than either cotton or linen,
and is a bad conductor of heat, as it has little tendency to remove the heat from
the body. It is therefore a warmer material than either of them; but, on the other
hand, from some peculiar action caused by the slightest friction against the skin,
it seems at times to cause irritation, and draw the blood to the surface. In many
instances the flow of blood is 80 severe as to set up an eruption of the skin, and
there is often so much irritation and intolerable itching produced, that the
garment has to be left off.
Last, but not least, of the quartette under consideration comes wool, and it is just
one of those materials whose place it would be almost impossible to fill. It is
obtained from the sheep, and is one of our chief productions in Australia.
Unfortunately it is somewhat irritating to some skins, and many persons will
declare that they cannot bear the feeling of anything woollen. Another
objection may be taken to it on cosmetic grounds, and it certainly is difficult to
make a flannel garment look attractive; but still, with a little taste in the way of
bordering, this may be overcome to a great extent. On the other hand, it has
great advantages which none of the foregoing fabrics possess, and which have
been already referred to.
Having thus minutely and scientifically examined into the properties of the various
clothing materials, it will clearly be seen that the one which possesses the
greatest advantages with the least possible disadvantages is wool. Hence it is to
be chosen in preference to all other fabrics for wearing next the skin, because it
wards off all risk of a chill striking the body. Its disadvantages, as said before, are
mainly two, the first being that some declare it is impossible to wear it next the
skin on account of its causing irritation; this, however, can only apply to new
flannel, since after two or three washings it feels as smooth as the most
fastidious skin could desire. The next objection, that it cannot be made to look
attractive or ornamental, is to a certain extent true; but if it is simply a question
of health versus appearance, those who would sacrifice the former deserve to
suffer. In this matter we may learn a wrinkle from a practical class of men,
namely, sailors. One will find many of them pin their faith on the virtues of an
abdominal flannel bandage, reaching from the lower part of the chest well down to
the hips. It thus covers the loins and abdomen, and for warding off attacks of
lumbago and muscular rheumatism, and for protecting the kidneys, it certainly is
valuable.
A flannel under-garment reaching from the neck well down to the hips should
always be worn, and in summer it may be of a thinner material than in the cooler
weather. It is better to have four made, so that two can be washed at a
time. In this way two can be in use every week, changing them day by day, so that
one is getting thoroughly aired while the other is being worn. The one which is
being aired should be turned inside out, so that the part which has been in contact
with the skin becomes thoroughly purified. It must be remembered, however, that
flannel is very liable to shrink from repeated washings. This may be provided for
by taking care that the under-garment, when first obtained, is several sizes too
large. In fact, it can hardly be too large at first, especially in the case of the
thicker one for the cooler months, which shrinks much more proportionately than
does the thinner one for the hot season. This shrinking, however, can to a great
extent be presented by paying attention to the following points: These woollen
under-garments should be washed by themselves not with any other clothes, in
only moderately hot water. Next, while they are still damp, and before becoming
dry, they should be thoroughly stretched upon a table and then well ironed out.
With regard to the sleeping apparel, there is no doubt the modern pyjamas are a
great improvement on the old-fashioned bedgown. They are more thoroughly
protective to the skin, and keep the extremities uniformly warm, which the latter
fails to do. They are better made of flannel, thin in summer and thicker in winter.
Persons who are in the habit of wearing woollen material next the skin during the
day should certainly keep to the same at night, otherwise the change is too great,
and there is thus great risk of taking a chill. The flannel under-garment which has
been worn during the day can then be taken off at night without any danger, and
has the opportunity of being aired. It might hardly seem necessary to refer to this
fact, namely, that the under-garment which has been worn during the day should
be taken off at night. Yet I can only say that instances in which this
particular garment is never taken off at all, but is worn continuously both night
and day, perhaps for a whole week at a time, are not altogether so rare as they
might be.
In conclusion reference may be briefly made to a subject which is probably within
the experience of everyone. There ale many people who pride themselves on not
requiring any extra clothing during the colder months, and evidently look upon this
fact as a proof that they possess Spartan powers of endurance, and that cold is a
matter of perfect indifference to them. Now, it may be that a few individuals
differ essentially from the rest of humanity, and do not require any change of
clothing all the year round. But the majority of people who profess this disregard
to climate certainly appear as if they would be all the better for warmer material,
for their faces look pinched and their hands seem nearly frozen with the cold. But
the fact is that even if the want of thicker clothing is not particularly felt during
the cold weather, it is always wiser to wear an extra allowance, for the heat of
summer can be endured better if this principle is carried out. If a common-sense
view of the matter is taken, then it will be readily apparent why it is desirable to
wear plenty of warm clothing during the colder months.
THE larger part of this work is taken up with a consideration of the most suitable
diet for those living in Australia. In this way a greater restriction in the amount of
butcher's meat is counselled, while a more widely extended use of fish, vegetables,
and salad plants is advocated. And as far as beverages are concerned, Australian
wine of a low alcoholic strength is recommended as being the most natural
beverage for every-day use. But there are a few other matters connected with
food, and drink, and daily habits which will deserve some little reference, and
accordingly they will be dealt with. These are fruit, tea, coffee, iced drinks, and
the use of tobacco. All these are important enough to merit notice; indeed, they
are subjects possessing more than usual interest.
Before proceeding to give attention to these, however, it will be most convenient,
at this stage, to make some remarks upon the vital topic of the first meal of the
day. With the great bulk of our population sufficient heed is never given it, and yet
it is of infinite consequence. By far the greater number of people dawdle in bed till
the last possible moment, when all at once they jump into their bath - that is, if
they take a bath - swallow a hasty breakfast, and make a frantic rush for their
steamer, train, or tram, in order to begin their daily work. How very much better
than all this bustle, hurry, and scuttle an hour's earlier rising would be! It would
afford ample time for the bath, which should be a bath in the truest sense of the
term; it would, above all, give a proper opportunity for a leisurely breakfast, which
is in every respect the most important meal of the day; and lastly, it would
save that wild dash at the last, which is so fatal to proper digestion and well-being.
But it is a sad fact that, in most cases, even when there is due time given to it,
the monotony of the ordinary breakfast is almost proverbial. With regard to the
average household it is a matter of deep conjecture as to what most people would
do if a prohibition were placed upon chops, steak, and sausages for breakfast. If
such an awful calamity happened, many the father of a family would have to put
up with scanty fare. It is very much to be feared that the inability to conceive of
something more original for the morning meal than the eternal trio referred to is
a melancholy reproach to the housekeeping capabilities of many. To read an
account of a highland breakfast, in contradistinction to this paucity of
comestibles, is to make one almost pensive. The description of the snowy
tablecloth, the generously loaded table, the delicious smell of the scones and
honey, the marmalade, the different cakes, the fish, the bacon, and the toast, is
enough to create a desire to dwell there for a very prolonged period. However,
revenons a' nos moutons; this has been adverted to, not so much with the idea
of urging people to copy such an example, because expense would render it an
impossibility, but to try and awaken a determination to make more variety at the
breakfast table. It is to be hoped that some of the recipes at the end of the
volume will serve as a means of initiating a reform in this respect.
But under all circumstances, whether brain or muscle be employed by the
bread-winner, a substantial breakfast is of first-rate importance. There is one
form of food which it is especially necessary should constitute part of the meal,
and which must be referred to. This is that variety known as the
hydro-carbons or fats. The value of fat, in any of its many forms, in promoting
the health of the body and preventing the onset of wasting diseases is hardly
appreciated, and besides this action it markedly serves to nourish the brain and
nervous system. Dr. Murchison, the late eminent physician, was wont to declare
that bacon fat or ham fat was worth a guinea an ounce in the treatment of
wasting diseases. Cod liver oil, also, has a wide repute in the treatment of the
same class of maladies. Indeed, it is related of an eminent barrister that he used
to take a full dose of cod liver oil some time before going to plead an important
case, for he found it better brain food than anything else.
In our semi-tropical climate, however, a dislike is often taken to butter when it is
presented at breakfast in the form of semi-liquid grease. It would require a person
with the stomach of an ostrich to digest, to say nothing of relish, such an
oleaginous compound during our hot months. But if this necessary and
all-important article of diet can be presented in an appetising shape, what a
desirable result is achieved I The mass of the people - I am not referring to those
who are well endowed with worldly gifts - are apt to look upon the ice chest as a
luxury which is altogether beyond their means. But, as I have said elsewhere, I am
firmly persuaded that if the price of ice were brought down to one-halfpenny per
pound, and if a company were formed to deliver such a small quantity as six
pounds per day, or every second day, it would be a great boon, and moreover a
wonderfully profitable speculation. A very small and suitable ice chest could be
constructed, to sell at a few shillings, solely to preserve the butter in a congealed,
and therefore palatable, state, for children as well as for adults. The former
would take it with great avidity, and the benefit to health resulting therefrom
would be incalculable. Even in some of the better-class houses ice is looked
upon too much as a luxury, and not, as it should be, a necessity; indeed, the money
saved from gas during the summer months might well be expended in ice.
Not only is this fatty breakfast a necessary feature in the diet of everybody,
particularly of the young and growing population, but it is likewise a most
important matter with all brain workers. If the business or professional man can
put in a liberal breakfast, consisting largely of butter, fat bacon or ham, he can go
on all day with a feeling of energy and buoyancy. It is in this aversion to fatty
matter, in any shape or form, that the bilious and dyspeptic are so fearfully
handicapped. And not only is it necessary for an active mental worker to be
supplied with a good proportion of fatty material, but, as I have just said, it is
essential that his breakfast should be a substantial one, in which his food is not
stinted in any way. As Dr. Milner Fothergill said: "I would always back a good
breakfaster, from a boy to a game cockerel; a good meal to begin the day is a
good foundation." So, too, Mr. Christopher Heath, the well-known London surgeon,
in his advice to house surgeons and other medical officers living in hospitals, says,
"the first symptom of \`knocking up,/' is an inability to eat breakfast," and goes
on to point out how important a meal it is, and that it should be taken deliberately
and without undue haste.
FRUIT
It is undoubtedly a most fortunate thing for us in Australia that fruit is so
abundant, and that it is easily within the reach of all. There is something
wonderfully attractive about it; its colouring in particular appeals so to the eye
that a good show of well-assorted fruit is always certain to ensure attention.
Many fruits, moreover, have a magnificent fragrance which lends to their
agreeable taste. It is somewhat of a pity that fruit is not more ordinarily eaten at
meals, particularly with the breakfast. There is an old proverb that fruit is gold in
the morning, silver at noon, and lead at night; and it is undoubtedly a fact that it is
especially beneficial when eaten early in the day. In France, fruit is a constant part
of every meal, and there is no question but that such a proceeding is desirable. It
was formerly the custom with English people at regular dinners to have dessert on
the table all through the courses, but it is now more customary to present it at
the termination of the repast, so that it is quite fresh and not saturated with
odours absorbed from the soup, fish, etc.
The agreeable qualities of fruits may be said to reside in three different factors.
First, there is the proportion of sugar, gum, pectin, etc., to free acid; next, the
proportion of soluble to insoluble matters; and thirdly, the aroma, which, indeed, is
no inconsiderable element therein. This latter quality -- the aroma, fragrance, or
perfume of fruit -- is due to the existence of delicate and exquisite ethers. These
subtle ethers Are often accompanied by essential oils, which may render the
aroma more penetrating and continued. Those fruits like the peach, greengage,
and mulberry, which almost melt in the mouth, contain a very large amount of
soluble substances. Some fruits, like the peach and apricot, carry but a small
amount of sugar as compared with the free acid they contain. Yet the free acid is
not distinctly perceptible, because its taste is covered by a larger proportion of
gum, pectin, and other gelatinous substances. There are other fruits again, such
as the currant and gooseberry, which are markedly acid, because there is only a
small amount of gum and pectin, and a relatively larger amount of free acid.
With regard to fruit when eaten in its raw state, the question of ripeness is
a most important ones and is always to be considered; so that whatever views
may be entertained as to the dietetic value of ripe fruit, there is a consensus of
opinion on the fact that when unripe it is most injurious. Care must be taken,
therefore, to see that it is perfectly ripe, and no considerations of economy must
be allowed to over-ride the fact. At the same time, though ripeness is a necessary
qualification of wholesomeness, yet fruit must not be over-ripe, as changes occur
which render it undesirable for the system, and thus in avoiding Scylla we may fall
into Charybdis. The skin of fruit should never be eaten, nor should the stones,
pips, or seeds be swallowed, as there is a danger of their accumulating in a small
pouch of the bowel known as the vermiform appendix. Their lodgment in this little
pocket is a constant source of peril, and would soon set up an inflammation, which
must always be attended with a considerable amount of danger.
As to the question of the unripeness or over-ripeness of fruit, the following
remarks by Dr. F.W. Pavy, an acknowledged authority on all that relates to food,
and worth recording: - "Fruit forms an agreeable and refreshing kind of food, and,
eaten in moderate quantity, exerts a favourable influence as an article of diet. It
is chiefly of service for the carbo-hydrates, vegetable acids, and alkaline salts it
contains. It enjoys, too, in a high degree, the power of counteracting the unhealthy
state found to be induced by too close a restriction to dried and salted provisions.
Whilst advantageous when consumed in moderate quantity, fruit, on the other
hand, proves injurious if eaten in excess. Of a highly succulent nature, and
containing free acids and principles liable to undergo change, it is apt, when
ingested out of due proportion to other food, to act as a disturbing element, and
excite derangement of the alimentary canal. This is particularly likely to
occur if eaten either in the unripe or over-ripe state; in the former case, from the
quantity of acid present; in the latter, from its strong tendency to ferment and
decompose within the digestive tract. The prevalence of stomach and bowel
disorders, noticeable during the height of the fruit season, affords proof of the
inconveniences that the too free use of fruit may give rise to."
The different forms of fruit, and also of vegetables, owe their great value to the
fact that they possess powerful anti-scorbutic properties. It will be best and
simplest to define the word "anti-scorbutic" as "good against the scurvy." This
latter disease is notably dependent on a want of fresh fruit and vegetables in the
dietary, and consequently is more often observed amongst sailors; and though
accessory conditions, such as great privations, bad provisions, or unhealthy
surroundings, may predispose to it, yet that which essentially produces it is the
deficiency of the former articles from the food. At the present time it is not
nearly so frequently seen, since, according to the mercantile marine regulations,
subject to legislative enactments passed in 1867, in lieu of vegetables, one ounce
of lime juice, sweetened with the same quantity of sugar, must be served out to
each man daily.
In scurvy there is some great change effected in the blood, and it is as well to
refer briefly to the characters possessed by the latter. The blood as it exists in
the body is a red alkaline fluid, having a saltish taste and possessing quite a
noticeable odour. It consists of minute bodies, the corpuscles, immersed in a
liquid, the liquor sanguinis. Salts also enter into its composition, and include the
chlorides of potash and soda; the phosphates of lime, magnesia,-and soda; the
sulphate of potash, and free soda. Of these the salts of soda predominate, and
the chloride -- that is, common salt -- is usually in excess of all the others.
The uses of these salts in the blood are to supply the different tissues with the
salts they respectively require, to take part in maintaining the proper specific
gravity and alkaline character of the blood, and to prevent any changes going on
within it.
In scurvy, as mentioned before, the blood seems to undergo some great change,
and there are accumulations of it beneath the skin. The gums become spongy,
bleeding on the slightest touch, and the teeth frequently loosen. Blood often flows
from the mouth and nose, or is vomited from the stomach, or is passed through
the bowels. Dr. Garrod advanced the view that scurvy was dependent on a
deficiency of potash in the stem, and that vegetables which contained potash
supplied the want. It is questionable, however, whether the disease is due to this
fact alone, since beef tea, which contains a good deal of potash, may be given
freely to a scorbutic patient, yet he fails to recover till proper anti-scorbutic diet
is supplied. Dr. Ralfe found by experiments that when acids are injected into the
blood, or an excess of acid salts administered, the same changes occur in the
blood as in scurvy. Hence he supposes that the latter disease is caused by a
decrease in the alkalinity of the blood, which results from the absence of fruit and
vegetables from the food.
Now, although characteristic cases of scurvy are as a rule to be met with chiefly
in sailors, yet there is no doubt that an insufficiency of the preceding in the
dietary brings about an unhealthy condition of the system. Many typical examples
of this are frequently seen in the patients admitted into our hospitals. They have
been living, perhaps, in isolated districts in the country, where their sole food was
mutton and damper, with no restriction placed on tea and tobacco. As a rule
their skin presents evidences of the need of proper diet, for it looks unhealthy
and is often covered with boils. But apart from these cases, which so plainly
indicate the origin of the poor condition of the blood, there are many instances in
which, from the want of vegetable food and fruit, the system becomes greatly
deranged. moreover, what is known as the blood being "out of order" is mostly
due to an unsuitable diet, consisting of animal food in excess, and a corresponding
deficiency of the other essentials.
The use of fruit, again, is especially indicated in persons disposed to the formation
of uric acid in excess. When this actually occurs, the system becomes overloaded
with deleterious matter, and the blood and body fluids are then saturated with a
materies morbi. This morbific material is best understood by regarding it as
being in an incomplete or half-way stage, in which form it is injurious. But, on the
other hand, if it had proceeded to its final change, the completed product would
have been harmless. Indeed, it is as the latter that it mostly leaves the body in
ordinary conditions of health. Well then, the retention within the system of this
incompletely transformed material gives rise to various symptoms. One of them is
a bitter or "coppery" taste in the mouth, notably in the early morning.
Oftentimes, too, patients will complain that they do not feel at all refreshed on
rising, even when they have slept fairly well -- which does not happen too
frequently. There may be also a great tendency to drowsiness, accompanied by
severe pains in the limbs, coming on about an hour after meals. Other symptoms
which are commonly met with are great irritability of the temper and lowness of
spirits. There is frequently a headache of a peculiar kind. It comes on generally in
the morning, and may last all day, or even for several days. It is a dull, heavy
pain, felt most often in the forehead. A curious feature of the affection
which sometimes exists is an incontrollable desire to grind the teeth during the
waking hours. There are other symptoms, also, characteristic of the same
malady, namely, palpitation of the heart and intermittency of the pulse; a liability
to colds on the chest; and perhaps repeated attacks of difficulty in breathing.
From all this it follows that a more liberal supply of fruit for such individuals would
be followed by the most beneficial results and their children might well be taught
to follow their example. For it must be remembered that all fruits contain alkaline
salts which are good for the blood. These alkaline vegetable salts become changed
within the body, and converted into the carbonate of the alkali, in which latter
form they pass out of the system.
But before finally closing this portion it is necessary to say a few words about
olives, from which the famous olive oil is obtained, and indeed with regard to their
virtues nearly a volume might be written. With many people the olive, like the
tomato, is an acquired taste, and unfortunately too many fail to overcome their
first impressions; but it is certainly worth acquiring, even if the process takes a
long time and requires much perseverance, on account of its highly nutritive value.
Children are often very fond of olives, and persistent efforts should be made to
induce those who do not like them to overcome their aversion. We speak of
"French olives" and "Spanish olives"; the former are gathered young, and are
small and hard, while the latter are allowed to remain till a later period of growth,
when they become softer and more pulpy. The French olives are more piquant in
flavour than the larger kind. They are also better to eat as a fruit, though many
prefer the Spanish, and are sometimes employed to clear the palate before
drinking wines. The larger or Spanish olives are more adapted for cooking, as
in the dish known as beef olives, and also for salads. There must be no
misconception as to the name French or Spanish as applied to olives; it does not
refer to the country from which they are derived, but simply serves to indicate
that they are taken from the tree at a particular time in accordance with the
habit observed in the respective countries. The mode of preparing the olives as
they reach us is as follows: They have been gathered when green, and soaked first
of all in strong lye -- that is, water saturated with alkaline salt, obtained by
steeping wood ashes in the former. They are next soaked in fresh water to
remove the somewhat acrid and bitter taste, and are then bottled in a solution of
salt and water. Ordinarily they are presented at table in a dish or other suitable
vessel, with a little of the liquid in which they have been preserved. In conclusion it
may be added that olives form an historical dish, for we are told that the supper
of Milton the poet consisted usually of bread and butter and olives.
TEA
Tea, with which we are all so familiar, is in reality a number of dried rolled leaves
of the tea plant, Camellia Thea, cultivated chiefly in China and the contiguous
countries. It is used excessively throughout Australasia -- for has it not been
shown that our four million people use more of this beverage than the millions who
inhabit Continental Europe, if Russia be excepted? This fact is much to be
deplored, for when taken in excess it causes severe functional derangement of
the digestive organs, and prejudicially affects the nervous system. The gentler
sex are greatly given to extravagant tea-drinking, exceeding all bounds of
moderation in this respect. Many of them, moreover, live absolutely on nothing
else but tea and bread and butter. What wonder, then, that they grow pale and
bloodless; that their muscles turn soft and flabby; that their nervous
system becomes shattered; and that they suffer the agonies of indigestion? Their
favourite time for a chat and the consumption of tea is at any period between ten
o'clock in the morning and three in the afternoon. Now, if there is anything of
which I am certain, it is that tea in the middle of the day, say from ten o'clock to
three, is a deadly destructive fluid. And I am equally certain, too, that innumerable
numbers of young girls employed in business do themselves an irreparable amount
of injury by making their mid-day meal consist of nothing else but tea and a little
bread and butter. There is no nourishment whatever in such fare, and it inevitably
leads to the bad symptoms already detailed and general unhealthiness, if not to
the onset of graver disease. No, they require something which is nutritious, such
as a little warm soup of some kind, a modicum of bread, and say two different
varieties of vegetables to follow. Of course this may be extended to include
pudding, stewed fruit, &c., but the former is ample enough in many respects. This
is a very important matter to which the attention of proprietors and managers of
large establishments, factories, and other places employing many female hands
might well be directed. And, moreover, if ever there was an opportunity for an
active organization to achieve really valuable work, it would be in seeing that our
city girls had something better to eat in the middle of the day than tea and bread
and butter.
As in every other case, however, there is all the difference in the world between
the use of anything and its abuse. It is wrong to assume that, because a great
deal of something is injurious, a small quantity judiciously employed is equally
pernicious. And so it is even in the case of tea, for it is not to be denied that a
fragrant cup of tea is very agreeable. As Dr. Vivian Poore most appropriately
remarked in reply to the argument that the lower animals did not require
tea, coffee, &c.: "We are not lower animals; we have minds as well as bodies; and
since these substances have the property of enabling us to bear our worries and
fatigues, let us accept them, make rational use of them, and be thankful." Of
course everything hinges upon the correct interpretation of the terms "small"
quantity, and "judiciously" employed. It may be said, however, that the drinking of
large cups of tea is never to be sanctioned under ally circumstances whatever. It
should rather be looked upon as a delicate fluid to be imbibed only in very small
quantities. It should certainly not be used in the middle of the day, between those
hours which I have specified; nor should it be taken during the evening, for it
almost always disturbs the night's rest.
There was a great controversy as to the proper way of making tea in the medical
papers not very long ago. It is of course a perennial topic, and always excites
considerable interest. This particular discussion began in this way. A new tea-pot,
called the anti-tannic tea-pot, appeared on the scene, and was favoured with a
long description by the British Medical Journal. It was claimed for this special
model that it extracted only the theine, and not the tannin from the tea. Now, as a
matter of fact, it is simply impossible to make tea, no matter how it is made,
entirely free from tannin. It is quite true that many suppose by infusing the tea
for a very brief period only - two or three minutes - the passage of the tannin into
the beverage can be prevented, but, as Sir William Roberts has pointed out, this is
quite a delusion. Tannin is one of the most soluble substances known, and melts in
hot water just as sugar does. Tea made experimentally, by pouring boiling water on
the dry leaves placed on filter paper, contains tannin. As Sir William remarks, you
can no more have tea without tannin, than you can have wine without alcohol.
Nevertheless, it is a fact that this anti-tannic tea-pot has many excellent
points about it, and is sure to meet with favour. It is really an attempt to make
tea by a more certain method than is generally employed; for I think it must be
admitted that the present happy-go-lucky style has not much to recommend it. On
one occasion the tea will be excellent - and on another either as weak as water, or
with such a sharp acrid taste that it is almost undrinkable. In the latter case the
tea has been allowed to soak so long that it has become a decoction instead of an
infusion. The consequence of this prolonged action of the hot water on the tea is
that it brings out the bitter extractive material of the plant, and it is this which
proves so particularly pernicious. Tea at sea is proverbially unpalatable, and
invariably disagrees, owing chiefly to the fact that it is a boiled decoction of tea
leaves and nothing else.
COFFEE
Coffee is the roasted and ground product of the seeds found within the fruit of a
tree, the Coffea Arabica. Originally a native of Abyssinia, it was transported into
Arabia at the beginning of the fifteenth century. Since then it has been widely
cultivated in the West Indies, in Ceylon, and in other warm countries. The fruit
itself much resembles a small cherry in size and appearance, and usually contains
two small seeds - the coffee beans themselves. The choicest coffee is the mocha
or Arabian coffee, and the bean is very small. Of the West Indian varieties, the
Jamaica and the Martinique coffee are the best. The exhilarating and agreeable
properties of coffee are dependent in great part upon three active principles
which it contains. The first of these is caffeine, which is almost identical in
composition with, and practically the same as, the theine present in tea. Next
there are the volatile oils, developed by roasting, from which coffee derives
its aroma. Indeed, as far as they are concerned, there are many who believe that
these ethereal oils have more to do with the characteristic properties of coffee
than even the caffeine itself. And, lastly, there are the acids known as
caffeo-tannic and caffeic acids, which are modified forms of tea tannin. They
exist to a far less extent, however, than does the tannin in tea.
Coffee has a decidedly stimulating effect upon the nervous system; so much so
that in France it has been called une boisson intellectuelle (an intellectual
beverage), from its stimulating all the functions of the brain. Not so long ago a
writer, Dr. J.N Lane, in the British Medical Journal gave some interesting,
information with respect to coffee and brain work. As the result of his own
experience he recommended "a cup of strong coffee, without cream or sugar,
preceded and followed by a glass of hot water every morning before breakfast.
The various secretions are thus stimulated, the nerve force aroused, no matter
how the duties of the preceding day and night may have drawn upon the system.
Another cup at four in the afternoon is sufficient to sustain the energies for
many hours." It is only fair to add, however, that the Journal went on to remark
that in this way some 50 grains of caffeine would be taken each week, and that
very little more might develop injurious symptoms, so that the power of doing an
illimitable amount of work would be obtained under somewhat risky conditions.
One of its most remarkable effects is that of relieving the feeling of fatigue or
exhaustion, whether this be produced by brain work or bodily labour. It enables the
system also to bear up under an empty stomach and when the supply of food is
shortened. In this way it is of signal value to the soldier in the field. Professor E.A.
Parkes, all admitted authority on these matters, bears testimony to the fact that
in military service it invigorates the system and is almost equally useful
against both cold and heat -- against cold by reason of its warmth, and against
heat by its action on the skin. It appears, also, to do sway with the need for sleep,
probably from its arousing the mental faculties, and the effect of a strong cup of
coffee in inducing wakefulness is well known. Coffee has, moreover, a distinct
action on the heart, and tends to strengthen it. The Germans are great believers
in its virtues, and Vogel, one of the principal authorities on diseases of children,
recommends it for them, mixed with cream, both as a food and as a tonic.
In addition to the foregoing, coffee is also employed by reason of its important
medicinal virtues. In malarious countries a cup of hot strong coffee, in the early
morning, is regarded as a preventive against fever and ague. It is a valuable agent
in many cases of heart disease, particularly when associated with dropsy. In
Bright's disease of the kidneys, where dropsy is present, it is likewise given with
benefit. Strong coffee is also a well-known remedy in asthma, both in relieving the
actual attack and in acting as a restorative after it is over. It frequently gives
great relief in many forms of nervous headache, particularly in that variety known
as migraine, in which the pain is generally limited to one side of the head. And,
lastly, coffee is a valuable remedy in opium poisoning, where there is such a
tendency to a fatal coma.
From the foregoing it must be evident that coffee occupies a very high position as
a beverage. All that concerns its preparation, therefore, is of undoubted interest.
In the first place, to obtain coffee in perfection it is indispensable that the beans
be roasted at home, and not only should the roasting be done in the house, but the
operation ought really to be performed immediately before the coffee is made,
and the reasons thereof I shall give in speaking of the process of roasting. Many
people do not care sufficiently about the perfection of coffee to go to this
trouble, and are content with having their roasted coffee beans sent to them daily
from their grocer. The leading establishments roast their coffee beans daily, and
from them the latter may be obtained and ground in the mill at home. This, of
course, though not giving the real thing, is an immense improvement on the
hallowed tradition, so dear to some, of purchasing their weekly supply of,,round
coffee at a time and keeping it in a tin or vessel for use as required. But, as I said
before, if perfection is aimed at, the roasting must be done at home.
In the selection of the green beans care should be taxiway to see that they are
nearly all of the same size, for if some are small and others large, when it comes
to roasting it will be found that the small ones are done to a cinder, while the
larger beans are hardly touched. The beans, too, should be perfectly dry; if moist,
they should be dried in a dish by the fire or in the oven before going into the
roaster. On the coffee plantations the drying of the bean is considered a most
important matter when preparing them for export.
In the process of roasting, a volatile oil which gives to coffee its unique fragrance
is developed. It is somewhat curious that no amount of boiling could educe this
from the raw bean. This oil is exceedingly volatile, and begins to disperse and
evaporate the very moment it is born. Hence, to obtain the perfection of coffee,
no time should be lost in grinding and making it directly it is roasted. When the
fragrant vapour of the roasted bean is first given off, it is soon followed by a
peculiar noise, caused by the splitting and crackling of the external silvery
greenish covering of the raw beans. At this time, or very shortly afterwards, the
latter are of a yellowish hue, but before long they change into that desirable
lightish brown colour, when the peculiar volatile coffee oils are at their best.
The best mill for grinding the coffee, and one which may be obtained from
any ironmonger, is that which can be screwed on the edge of the kitchen table or
dresser. It has a little contrivance to regulate the size of the grains. and care
must be taken not to grind the coffee too fine; it should be in minute crumbs
rather than in powder.
As I have already said, the perfection of coffee is only to be obtained under three
conditions. These are, first, that the beans should be roasted at home; that they
should be ground without much delay; and, thirdly, made into coffee as soon as
possible. Many people are, however, unable to carry out the first of these three
requirements. The next best substitute is to have the roasted coffee beans sent
daily to them by their grocer. This is a practice which might be followed more
frequently with a great deal of advantage, for all are able, at least, to possess a
mill and grind their own coffee at home.
The making of the coffee is quite as important as the preceding, and the number
of different models of coffee-makers is almost perplexing. But of them all, the
one which is simplest, and perhaps most effective, is the ordinary cafetiers, or
French coffee-pot. This has the advantage of costing only a few shillings, and is
readily obtainable from any ironmonger. It consists of an upper compartment in
which the coffee is made, and a lower part -- the coffee-pot itself -- into which
the coffee descends. These two portions are quite separate, although the upper
fits on the lower. The floor -- on which the coffee is placed -- of the upper part is
perforated by a number of minute holes There is also a movable strainer about an
inch in depth, which fits on top of the upper part; and a presser, consisting of a
long rod with a circular plate at its end, which for convenience passes through the
centre of the strainer, and rests on the perforated floor of the upper part.
There are one or two points to be borne in mind in the making of coffee. As
a rule English-speaking people do not allow enough coffee to each cup. The almost
universal fault of coffee, made elsewhere than on the Continent, is its want of
strength and flavour. With regard to the admixture of chicory, this is largely a
question of taste, and the palate must be consulted in the matter. The great
majority of people, however, cannot do without it, and it is quite (when genuine) a
harmless addition. Madame Lebour-Fawssett recommends the following
proportions: For making cafe' noir, or coffee after meals, there should be six
teaspoonsful of coffee, heaped up, and a very small teaspoonful of chicory, or
none at all, for one pint of water. The chicory must be left out altogether, and
another teaspoonful of coffee substituted for those who object to chicory with
their cafe' noir. For morning coffee or cafe' au lait there should be ten or twelve
teaspoonsful of coffee, with a sixth part of chicory, for each pint of water. As
Madame Lebour-Fawssett remarks, cafe' au lait is never complete without
chicory, but care should be taken not to overdo it, since too much chicory renders
the coffee quite undrinkable. Of course, if you do not require as much as a pint of
coffee, the quantities may be reduced, still observing the same proportions.
Before pouring out the coffee, the cup should first be half filled with hot milk, and
then the coffee added.
Now, having seen what proportions of coffee and chicory are to be employed for
cafe' noir and cafe' au lait respectively, it will be better to describe the actual
making of the coffee, since the cafetire will then be more easily understood. We
will suppose its upper part is fitted into its place on the top of the lower portion,
and that the strainer and presser have been removed for the time being. Enough
boiling water should first of all be poured in to fill both the upper and lower
compartments, allowed to stand for a couple of minutes, and then poured away.
This brings everything to a proper heat for receiving the coffee.
Next put the amount of coffee necessary upon the perforated floor of the upper
part. The coffee should then be well pressed down with the presser, and the latter
instrument next laid aside. After this the strainer should be replaced on top of
the upper compartment, and the required amount of boiling water, a little at a
time, poured in through it (the strainer). The object of pouring in the boiling water
slowly is to give it time to percolate through the densely pressed coffee lying on
the floor of the upper part. There is a little tin cover fitting over the spout of the
lower compartment, which should be adjusted to keep in the steam. The whole may
then be set aside for a few minutes, and when the coffee has passed into the
lower part, it is ready for use. With a little practice, and by paying attention to
these details, the most perfect coffee may be made.
ICED DRINKS
In Australia some reference to the subject of iced drinks is necessarily required,
for they are in great request during the hot season. There is a considerable
amount of diversity of opinion as to their good and bad effects, but it will be found
that the experience of most medical men is that when used in moderation they
greatly relieve thirst and are not injurious. This, indeed, is my own belief, and were
it not for the abuse of iced drinks, the same opinion would be held almost
universally. America is the country of countries in which the inordinate use of ice
has gained for it a reputation which it has never deserved. Ice, says George
Augustus Sala, is the alpha and omega of social life in the United States. At the
hotels, first-class or otherwise, the beverage partaken of at dinner is mostly iced
water. Every repast, in fact, begins and ends with a glass of iced water.
When consumed in this way it is no wonder that it often disagrees, and that
ice-water dyspepsia is a definite malady in America. And more than this, imagine
carrying the employment of ice to such an extent that it culminates in that
gastronomical curiosity, a baked ice! The "Alaska" is a baked ice, of which the
interior is an ice cream. This latter is surrounded by an exterior of whipped
cream, made warm by means of a Salamander. The transition from the hot
outside envelope to the frozen inside is painfully sudden, and not likely to be
attended with beneficial effect. But the abuse of a good thing is no argument
whatever against its use in a moderate and rational manner.
It will be desirable, however, to see what is believed in India about iced drinks, for
it will be something of a guide for us in Australia. There are two authorities in
particular who have been already referred to, and who have written on this matter
in its application to India. The first of these is Sir James Ranald Martin, who had
twenty-two years experience there in different parts, and is therefore entitled to
be listened to. He says that ice is a matter of necessity in the East, and quotes
Dolomieu, who observes of iced drinks that "they revive the spirits, strengthen
the body, and assist the digestion."
There is also that other great name, that of Sir Joseph Fayrer, who is most
competent to speak on Indian matters. In setting forth rules for the guidance of
those who purpose living in India, he remarks that iced water may be drunk with
impunity there; that he has no recollection of seeing any one suffer from drinking
iced water or iced soda water in a hot climate; and that in the great heat it is
good, since it tends to keep down the body temperature. When the system is
prostrated by the sun or extreme heat, or exhausted by physical or intellectual
exertion in a hot and damp atmosphere, he believes that a glass of iced
water slowly swallowed is far more refreshing than the iced brandy, or whisky peg,
or draught of beer, too frequently indulged in under such circumstances.
The different writers on food and dietetics, who have given considerable attention
to the same subject, are almost unanimous in their opinion to the same effect.
There will be no occasion to refer to all of them, but three at least deserve a brief
mention. Dr. Burney Yeo has recently observed that iced water, when taken in
small quantities, is refreshing and cooling, and likewise stimulates the digestive
functions. On the other hand, it is certainly injurious when taken in inordinate
amount. According to Dr. T. King Chambers, cool drinks are beneficial to the
stomach in hot weather, since they help to reduce the increased temperature to
which the over-heated blood has brought it. Ice, moreover, is a valuable addition to
the dietary both of the sick and of the healthy. There is one caution to be
observed, however, and it is that ice is injurious when the system is exhausted
after violent exercise. And lastly, Dr. Milner Fothergill believes the craving for cool
drinks during the hot weather is such, that there is evidently some irrepressible
desire to be satisfied. He even writes that in his opinion the dyspepsia of
Americans is not entirely due to the free use of iced water, but that there are
other causes which help to bring it about.
But while all this is greatly in favour of the moderate use of iced drinks, the purity
of the source from which the ice is obtained is also a matter of the highest
importance. Ice is not ice when the water from which it is derived is impure. There
was an outbreak of sickness amongst the visitors at one of the large hotels at
Rye Beach, a watering-place in America, one summer. The symptoms were an
alarming disturbance of the with severe pain, great feverishness, and
depression of spirits. It was found that the ice which occasioned this outbreak had
been taken from a stagnant pond containing a large amount of decomposing
matter. A portion of it was carefully melted, and was found to contain a
considerable quantity of decaying vegetable matter. In the case of artificial ice,
the question of purity is even more important. The reason for this is that the
water used in the manufacture of artificial ice is usually frozen solid, and
whatever substances, consequently, are dissolved in the water remain in the ice
itself.
TOBACCO
Five out of every six male adults smoke, whether it be cigarette, cigar, or pipe.
That is, in a gathering of, say, 600 men, 500 will be smokers and 100
non-smokers. At least, this is the estimated proportion in the old country. In
Australia the ratio is about the same, but the average amount of tobacco used by
every smoker is greater. According to Mr. T. A. Coghlan in his Wealth and
Progress of New South Wales, the annual consumption of tobacco in Australia
for each inhabitant is 3 lbs. all but a fraction. For the United Kingdom the
corresponding amount is 1.41 lbs.; and for the United States of America, 4.40 lbs.
Italy, it would seem, consumes in the same way 1.34 lbs.; France, 2.05 lbs.;
Germany, 3 lbs.; Austria, 3.77 lbs.; Turkey, 4.37 lbs.; while Holland reaches the
excessive amount of 6.92 lbs. Of the five colonies of Australia, namely, New South
Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and West Australia, the use of
tobacco is greatest in the latter two; the figures for Queensland being 3.53 lbs.,
and for West Australia 4.11 lbs.
With regard to the effect of tobacco on the human system, it will perhaps be
most convenient to make a division into the following three classes. In the first
place there are a certain number of people upon whom tobacco in any shape or
form has an absolutely poisonous influence. There must be some peculiar
susceptibility of the system in their case which renders them especially vulnerable
to its action. On this account, therefore, they are better without tobacco at all,
and any attempt to habituate themselves to it must be attended with prejudice to
health. Secondly, there are many other people who can only use tobacco in its very
mildest forms. They may be able to smoke a few cigarettes daily, perhaps only
three or four; if they indulge in a cigar, it must be one of the mildest; if a pipe, the
tobacco will have to be the very lightest. Anything exceeding their allowance is an
excess for which they are obliged to pay the penalty. Then, again, there is a third
class who can enjoy tobacco in moderation. But these are the very people who are
most apt to abuse their privilege. And although they do not recognise it at once,
the effect of their excessive smoking is bound to assert itself at last, and compel
them to curtail their allowance. If those in the second category, who can enjoy the
mildest tobacco in the smallest quantities, and those in the third, who can smoke
in moderation, were never to exceed their proper amount, no very great harm
would follow. But it most frequently happens that both overstep their respective
bounds, and the result is injury to health.
The tobacco plant, Nicotiana Tobacum, belongs to the order Solanaceae, which
also includes belladonna, capsicum, henbane, and likewise the common potato. Its
active principle, an alkaloid -- nicotine or nicotia - is combined with a vegetable
acid. Some of the alkaloids, such as morphine, strychnine, &c., are crystalline in
character, but this, along with a few others, is liquid. A single drop of it is fatal to
the smaller animals, a cat or Even as it is, the first smoke usually produces
characteristic results. There is generally pallor of the face, nausea, and vomiting.
Usually a cold, clammy sweat breaks out, and the heart seems as if it were about
to stop. The system, however, gradually becomes habituated to its action, and
these symptoms do not reappear. Seeing that this somewhat unpleasant
apprenticeship is uncomplainingly served, it is evident that in smoking there must
be some powerful attraction. There are many, indeed, who persist in it when it is
doing them an inconceivable amount of injury.
It is a fortunate thing that almost all of the nicotine passes off, or is burnt up, or
else the effect would be more markedly disastrous. But the pleasurable effects of
tobacco are derived in great part from the volatile alkaloids formed during
combustion. The alkaloids which develop during the smoking of a pipe are entirely
different from those of a cigar. In a pipe, according to Vold and Eulenburg, the
tobacco yields a very much larger proportion of volatile bases, especially of the
very volatile and stupefying pyridine. On the other hand, a cigar produces but little
pyridine, but more of the less active collidine. It is well known that very much
stronger tobacco can be smoked as a cigar than as a pipe. As a matter of fact a
cigar which could be enjoyed as a cigar, would cause sickness if cut up into small
pieces and smoked in a pipe. This pyridine to which reference has just been made
has lately been brought forward as a remedy for asthma. Now, the effect of
tobacco in cutting short an attack of this latter malady is, at times, very marked.
And Professor Se'e, the eminent French physician, believes that the pyridine is the
relieving agent.
In the earlier part of this section I have attempted to form a provisional
classification of people as far as the effect of tobacco is concerned. Firstly,
those upon whom tobacco in any shape or form is an absolute poison;
secondly, those who can enjoy a very small amount-daily; and thirdly, those who
are able to smoke in moderation. Now, while those who use tobacco with wise
discretion appear to be none the worse for it, yet it unfortunately happens that
far too frequently there is no limit to this discretion. It is too often the case,
therefore, that quite a serious amount of damage to health results from
excessive smoking. It requires a good deal of judgment, and even more resolution,
to use and not abuse tobacco.
There are certain symptoms which should lead a man either to curtail his
allowance, or else give up tobacco altogether. These are marked nervousness,
trembling of the whole body, unsteadiness of the hands, and twitching of different
muscles. There may be also swimming of the head, severe headache, and a feeling
of despondency. In other cases there may be irritability of temper, a want of will
determination, and progressive loss of memory. The special senses - sight,
hearing, taste, smell, and touch - may all be blunted. The Bight and hearing are
often markedly affected. Colour blindness is sometimes a result, and there may
be that impairment of vision known tobacco amblyopia. As regards the hearing,
too, there is not unfrequently a drumming in the ears and confusion of sounds.
And more than this, tobacco, when unsuitable or used in excess, has other
prejudicial effects. Its action on the heart is well known, and is frequently
manifested by violent palpitation and by disturbed action of the heart. There is
also a definite disorder known as "the smoker's heart." In this affection the
beats, instead of being regular, are very rapid, suddenly becoming very slow. In
this way the rhythm of the heart has been aptly compared by Dr. Lauder Brunton
to a restive horse, who goes into a gallop for a few yards, next pulls up all at once,
and then breaks off into a gallop again. When tobacco has these prejudicial
effects upon the heart, it is no good diminishing the allowance. The only way to
bring about any good result is to knock it off altogether.
In addition to its direct action on the heart, tobacco smoking may also bring on a
sudden fainting, in which there is absolutely no warning. This condition may develop
from the tobacco alone, but in many instances nervous excitement or shock are
superadded. Professor Fraser, of Edinburgh, has observed that quite a number of
his college friends, who smoked to an inordinate extent as students, were obliged
to give up tobacco as middle age approached. Several of them had to do so on
account of the onset of these sudden fainting fits. Many smokers also suffer
from what is termed chronic pharyngitis. In this affection the mucous membrane
at the back part of the mouth looks like dirty-red velvet, and there is also a
constant hawking of phlegm. And further, indigestion itself is in many eases
entirely due to excessive smoking, from which there is no relief except by
abandoning the habit altogether.
But even when tobacco does not produce such marked ill effects, it is as well to
remember that it has always a definite action from a gastronomic point of view.
And it is this, that directly after the first draw of a cigarette, cigar, or pipe, the
palate loses its delicacy of perception. As Sir Henry Thompson remarks, after
smoke the power to appreciate good wine is lost, and no judicious host cares to
open a fresh bottle from his best bin for the smoker. This is perfectly true; under
such circumstances valuable wine would simply be thrown away. But, on the other
hand, there is an unquestionable sympathy between coffee and tobacco, and a cup
of Mocha blends harmoniously with choice Latakia. This is well recognised in the
East; and throughout the Continent coffee and temperate habits go hand in
hand with the cigar or cigarette. We must also agree with Sir Henry when he
declares that smoke and alcoholic drinks are only found associated together in
Great Britain and other northern nations, where there are to be found the most
insensitive palates in Europe. It is a good thing, therefore, that the habits followed
here are unknown to him, or else Australia would certainly have had a rap over the
knuckles.
THIS comes last alphabetically of the five essentials concerned in the maintenance
of health - namely, ablution: the skin and the bath; bed-room ventilation; clothing;
diet; and exercise - but it is none the less important on that account. Exercise
may be defined as action of the body, whereby its organs and their functions are
kept in a state of health. Each one of us has from the moment of his existence a
certain stature allotted, as it were, to which he will attain. In this way some will be
tall, others will be short, so that the height of the body is something quite beyond
our control, as we know by the interrogation, "Which of you by taking thought can
add one cubit to his stature?" But in contradistinction to height, we know that the
muscles of the body can be developed and increased in size by use. It is by their
action in exercise that the muscles are enlarged, hardened, and brought to their
greatest state of perfection. And it is only by exercise, and by exercise alone,
that they can be maintained at the acme of physical condition.
Now, in the same way that education develops and increases the power of the
brain, so exercise has a similar effect on the body. When the muscles are
strengthened, the beneficial effect is also participated in by the heart, lungs, and
digestive organs, and thus the removal of worn-out material from the body is
assisted. The effect of exercise is thus to remove used up products from the
system, and so afford an opportunity for renewed material to take their place.
Ceaseless changes are constantly going on throughout the body, and any part
which has fulfilled its object is no longer necessary for the requirements of
the system, in fact it becomes injurious. Its removal has to take place by one of
the various outlets, and it is by exercise that its expulsion is greatly assisted. In
this way exercise differs altogether from the part played by food. The latter is
the introduction of nourishment into the system for the renewal of its wants,
while exercise is the principal agent by which de'bris is eliminated.
It was well known amongst the Greeks and Romans that the muscles reached their
greatest state of development by means of exercise. Though, therefore,
gymnastics formed a great part of their system of education, yet the chief aim in
their athletic instruction was the desire to train men to fight their battles, and in
those days war was a matter of personal valour and of individual bravery. On that
account, therefore, the men who were selected as their soldiers were among the
healthiest of the nation. Those who by reason of bodily infirmity or inherent
weakness were unfitted for military prowess were left alone. But, as Maclaren has
well pointed out, the object of systematic and proper exercise is not for the
production of a race of soldiers, though a certain proportion of the population will
always be required for military service. With the great majority of men the
struggle for existence is keen, and it is simply a question of the survival of the
fittest, and of the weakest going to the wall. The requirements of the present
time are therefore a capacity for endurance and an ability to withstand the
effects of work day after day. We do not require athletes who are capable of
performing wonderful feats of strength; but the fight of the nineteenth century is
brain against brain, and he will be best equipped for the struggle who has the
advantage of good bodily health. In the higher callings, where brain power is
everything, the necessity for perfect physical condition is all the more imperative,
because the brain is supplied with healthy blood, and the ideas flow with less
effort.
The brain is an organ of the body exactly in the same way that the heart,
the lungs, and the liver are, and therefore is subject to the same changes which
belong to every other part of the frame. It will be at its best when there is
circulating through it a full supply of rich red arterial blood, for that means a
continual renewal of fresh material to it, and a speedy removal of worn-out
products. It is by exercise mainly, whether it be voluntarily undertaken, or
whether it pertain to the calling, that the body is kept at the pink of condition, and
the brain benefited accordingly. Another great and important result from
improving the bodily health is the increased power of what we call the will. The
undertaking, say, of a long walk or climb involves the possession of a certain
amount of determination, and many people, though perfectly aware of the good to
be obtained by a few hours' exercise outside the house, have not the
determination to carry it into effect. Once the disinclination to move is overcome,
the effort required is less each time, and ultimately the will gains a distinct
mastery.
When the muscles are put into action, what is termed their contractility is called
into play - that is, the force which was dormant before is roused into activity.
This is effected through the nervous system, and it is the will which emanates
from the brain and is carried along certain nerves to accomplish definite actions.
During the contraction of a muscle its individual fibres change in form, producing
an alteration in the shape of the whole muscle; thus it becomes shorter and
thicker. At the same time, while it is in action more blood flows through it, hence
we see that one of the beneficial effects of exercise is to stimulate the
circulation through the muscular system. It has also been ascertained by
experiments, that the venous blood which comes from a muscle in action is darker
in colour than that from a muscle in repose. When the circulation is quickened by
movement, and the blood stream hastened, the vigour of the body is increased,
because the used up material is all the quicker taken away, and a freshly created
supply of nutrition brought to every part.
The rate of breathing is accelerated whenever the body is engaged in muscular
exertion, and with this quickened breathing there is an increased amount of
oxygen drawn in, and an increased amount of carbonic acid gas and water exhaled
by the breath. The oxygen which is absorbed from the air into the blood is stored
in the red corpuscles of the latter, by which it is carried to every part of the
body. The venous blood which returns from every portion of the system comes
back as a dark crimson, instead of being bright scarlet like the arterial blood. It
contains carbonic acid, and returns it to the lungs, where it is exhaled by the
breath. The oxygen is necessary to existence, while the carbonic acid is injurious.
The effect of exercise, then, in any form, is thus to distribute healthy blood more
rapidly through the system, while it removes the injurious matters quite as
speedily. The effect of active exercise on the heart, as it is well known, is to make
it beat faster; by this the blood is driven through the body at a quicker rate than
usual. Sometimes, when the effort is unusually severe, there is a disturbance of
the regular balance between the heart and the lungs. There is thus produced an
irregular or unequal action of the former, causing what is known as "loss of wind,"
which is, however, soon restored by resting.
There is an excessive flow of blood to the surface of the body, causing it to
redden, and at the same time the perspiration is greatly increased. It is on
account of this latter moisture opening up the pores of the skin that the good
effects of exercise are chiefly due. The perspiration consists mainly of water
containing different salts and organic matters. It is found by experiment
that the amount of water passing through the lungs and skin is usually doubled
even with moderate exertion.
The result of moderate exercise in benefiting the nervous system is well known,
and the effect of a gentle walk in making the ideas flow through the brain is a
matter of common observation. At the same time, it must be borne in mind that
exercise, when carried to the verge of fatigue, compels inactivity of the brain for
a time, since Nature must have repose. But when carried out in moderation with a
view of improving the condition of the body, it conduces to the salubrity of the
brain as well, for the latter organ shares in the health of the former. The only
thing to guard against is irregular and fitful doses; thus it is far better to take a
little in moderation daily, than to attempt to make one day's exercise suffice for
the rest of the week.
It follows from the foregoing, therefore, that without exercise a perfect state of
health is an impossibility. There can be no proper bodily health unless there be
daily exercise. It is the same with everybody, no matter what the condition of life
may be. Exercise is quite as necessary for the well-to-do man as it is for him who
is not so circumstanced. The laws of health cannot be violated, and all the money
in the world will not atone for neglect in this respect. Exercise is not a matter
that can be carried out by proxy. No; each one must take his own exercise, and he
derives all the benefit for himself.
It is a fortunate thing, then, that most people have to earn their own living, for
the exertion thereby entailed is actually necessary for health. Yet, while this is
the case with those who live by their bodily labour, it hardly applies to those who
are more dependent upon mental work. For instance, the latter include literary
men and journalists, the members of the professions, and those of the vast
commercial world -- all, indeed, who have brain strain and clerical
occupations. In their case the great fault is that they use their heads too much
and their limbs too little. For them walking is one of the very best means of
obtaining health, and it should be regularly and systematically practised.
It has been said that no man under sixty, unless he be kept walking while at his
work, should walk less than six or eight miles a day, if he wishes to keep well and
have healthy children. In the cooler weather in Australia these are certainly
suitable distances, but in the hot months half these amounts will be found
sufficient, and they had better be carried out in the cool of the evening. Then
again, for those over sixty it has been well observed that a daily walk is still the
best means of promoting health. But the walk must always be proportionate to
the strength, and should be done at nothing more than a moderate pace, if a man
wishes to take care of his blood vessels.
There is another matter which calls for notice, and it is that of early morning
exercise. Now, I am quite willing to admit that there are many who derive great
benefit from their early morning swim, their matutinal walk, or their tennis before
breakfast. But it should be distinctly borne in mind that there are others with
whom such early morning exercise does not agree. They get as a result a weary,
languid feeling which lasts throughout the entire day. Now, they are apt to imagine
it is the exercise in itself which produces this effect. But the truth is, it arises
from the time of day at which the exercise is taken, and is not due to the exertion
at all. It must not be forgotten, therefore, that while many people derive the
greatest advantage from early morning exercise, yet there are others for whom
it is altogether unsuitable. But, on the other hand, the latter will obtain every
possible benefit by taking their allowance of exercise at some other period
of the twenty-four hours.
There are other forms of exercise besides walking, and these have their good
points. Riding is, of course, invaluable, especially in cases of sluggish liver. As it
has been wittily observed, the outside of a horse is the best thing for the inside of
a man. In the cool months in Australia riding is a real pleasure, but in the hot
season it is hardly so agreeable. Then again, rowing is a magnificent exercise, and
has much to recommend it in early adult life. There is no harm whatever in rowing
as an exercise, but when it comes to racing that is a different matter. It is the
great strain on the heart, together with the excitement which constitute the
sources of risk. The other varieties of exercise, namely, gardening, the different
games, cricket, football, tennis, &c., need not be particularized as they all
subserve the same purposes, and are in consequence very desirable.
In all the preceding I have endeavoured to show that daily exercise is absolutely
necessary for the proper maintenance of health. But there is something even
more than this. It is that a long life itself is to be ensured by exercise. It is only by
exercise, and by exercise alone, that the various organs of the body, the heart,
the lungs, the stomach, the liver, &c., are maintained in their normal state of
health. Their condition, moreover, is only to be improved by the muscular
movements belonging to exercise. The heart itself is intended for action, not for
inaction. By action it thrives, and by disuse it becomes weakened. It is so with all
the other organs. In conclusion, therefore, it must be said that the whole system
can only be kept in perfect health by muscular movements, and that in addition to
keeping the body in health exercise actually increases the chances of living to a
good old age.
"Bad Cookery diminishes happiness, and shortens life." -- Wisdom of Ages.
IN all probability there are but few who have ever had their attention called to
certain figures duly set forth within the pages of that mine of information,
namely, Mr. T. A. Coghlan's Wealth and Progress of New South Wales.
Nevertheless, the facts associated with these statistics so directly concern our
Australian daily life that they deserve to be widely known. That portion of the
work in which our food supply is considered, therefore, is well worth referring to.
It will he found that the consumption of butcher's meat by each inhabitant is
greater than in any other country in the world. Thus the amount of meat required
for each member of the community every year in New South Wales is 201 lbs.; in
Victoria 275 lbs.; whilst in Queensland 370 lbs. are called for. On the other hand,
in the United Kingdom only 109 lbs. are similarly needed; in the United States of
America 150 lbs. while the figures for the different European countries show an
average of no more than 70 lbs.
Another article of commerce which is consumed to excess in all parts is tea. As I
have previously stated, it is estimated by Coghlan that the four million people in
Australasia use more of this beverage than all the millions who inhabit continental
Europe, that is, if Russia be excluded; but he further points out that in Australia
itself the use of tea is universal. The tables show that for each inhabitant
New South Wales requires annually 7.8 lbs.; Victoria, 7.7 lbs.; South Australia, 6.5
lbs.; and Queensland 8.4 lbs.; and moreover, that West Australia attains a
maximum with 10.6 lbs. Now, according to Mulhall, in his Dictionary of Statistics,
the amount of tea consumed annually for each inhabitant in the United Kingdom is
only 5 lbs.; and for the United States of America the proportion is but 1.5 lbs.
A survey of these figures consequently must compel us to admit that Australia is
inhabited by a people largely carnivorous and addicted to tea. Surely not one
person in a thousand would advocate such a diet under any circumstances. Is it
not astonishing, therefore, that innutritious fare of this land is still tolerated in
Australia? Facts such as these call for the most serious consideration, since they
must irresistibly affect the national life; but though it may seem strange, these
matters have never received the notice they stand in need of, if, indeed, they
have ever received any notice at all.
There are worlds of interest, however, centred in the notable circumstance that
Australia, a new and a semitropical country, is now being peopled by the
descendants of those who belonged to an entirely different climate. At the
present time the old racial instincts are actively powerful, and exert an influence
diametrically opposed to climatic surroundings; and, as a matter of fact, we are
witnessing a struggle between our Anglo-Saxon heredities and our Australian
environment. But such a conflict against our destiny is one in which the odds are
overwhelmingly on one side. For of all forces, that of climate is the most powerful.
It is true that man is able almost to remove mountains, and that he can create
rivers in an arid land; but to endeavour to resist the dominating influence of
climate is to attempt the impossible.
Yet there is something more than all this which should induce us to follow
the promptings of nature; this is the fact that Australia will only reach the zenith
of her possibilities when her people conform to her climatic requirements. For
what would the latter mean? Market gardens innumerable, and a healthy and
lucrative life for all concerned; the development of her deep-sea fisheries, and
employment, direct as well as indirect, to thousands; the cultivation of the vine,
with all the wealth pertaining to smiling vineyards; the growth of the olive and
other fruits, and all the other industries which only await their creation; and
instead of this, at present, all we possess is the knowledge that we are the
greatest meat-eating and tea-drinking race on earth.
PROGRESSIVE CHANGES IN THE THEORIES OF EDUCATION.
We are told that it was Jean Jacques Rousseau who first entirely severed
education and learning. In his E'mile, published in 1762, he advocated a more
natural and less pedantic method of training and developing the physical, mental,
and moral faculties of the young. The work produced an astounding effect on its
appearance, and has largely influenced the educational methods throughout
Europe.
Not so long afterwards, in 1801, Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi, permeated with the
atmosphere following the French Revolution, gave to the world his views on
education in his work How Gertrude Teaches her Children. The essence of his
belief being that "sense-impression is the foundation of instruction," he
counselled the development of all the faculties in preference to the mere
acquisition of words. "Words alone," said he, "cannot give us a knowledge of
things; they are only useful for giving expression to what we have in our own
minds." Consequently, he believed in imparting instruction by a direct appeal to
the senses and the understanding so as to call forth all the powers, selecting the
subjects of study so that each step should progressively assist the pupil's
advancement. He contended that observation was the method by which knowledge
was principally gained, and that the perceptive faculties (intuition) were developed
by observation. Even in his own time his ideas were awarded a recognition of their
value; in fact, he had the honour of being specially visited by Prince de Talleyrand
and Madame de Sta'l.
In the early part of the present century another reformer, Friedrich Wilhelm
August Froebel, arose to influence all future educational methods. As with
Rousseau, Froebel held that each age belonged to itself, and that the perfection of
the later stage could only be attained through perfection of the earlier. So, too,
while Pestalozzi upheld that the faculties were developed by exercise, Froebel
went farther, and added that the function of education was to develop the
faculties by arousing voluntary activity, in this way becoming, according to
Michelet, the greatest of educational reformers. Froebel was convinced that man
was primarily a doer, indeed, even a creator, and that he learnt only through
"self-activity." In action, moreover, there was not alone the mere physical
exercise, but also the actual unfolding and strengthening of the mental powers. To
Froebel, indeed, belongs the honour of originating the kindergarten system, which
is making such progress at the present time; and more than this, it may be said
that while it is employed only in the earlier stages of education, yet his principles
are beginning to make themselves felt throughout the entire system of education.
As a matter of fact, what is known in Sweden and in Finland as slyd, or manual
instruction, may be regarded as a continuation of the Kindergarten system.
Through the exertions of Uno Cygnaeus the whole of the national system of
education in Finland was reorganized, and manual work was first made a part of
the regular instruction in the common schools. In Sweden, likewise, the same
principles have been introduced chiefly by Herr Otto Salomon, the director of the
great sloyd seminarum at Naas. Sloyd work is used in the schools in a disciplinary
way as an integral part of general education; the children, generally boys, are
employed for a certain number of hours a week in making articles of common
household use. It is maintained that work of this kind is specially invaluable in
supplementing the ordinary school education of the three R's. It fulfils the
injunction "to put the whole boy to school;" it develops faculties which would
otherwise lie dormant, while at the same time it trains the eye and does away with
clumsy fingers.
THE PURPOSE OF EDUCATION.
From the foregoing it will be seen that within the last 130 years a striking change
has come over the view held respecting education. Prior to that time an artificial
and pedantic method prevailed, which received its first check from the pen of
Rousseau. The system which he attacked, however, built up as it was upon
centuries of mediaeval learning, was not to be disposed of by this one encounter.
Such a result was not to be expected in the natural order of things; but as the
ideas of Rousseau contained the living truth, they were bound to find advocacy in
due course, and though the seed might lie quiescent for a time, yet it was sure to
germinate sooner or later. After him the path of educational reform was illumined
by the genius of Pestalozzi, and a few years later Froebel appeared to influence
for ever the methods of education. Indeed, it was the latter who by his
kindergarten system has founded the practical education of our own day.
The vast change, then, along the whole line of education has been from scholastic
learning towards that of education in manual training. This is the truest
recognition of the fact that the purpose of education is to prepare a child for his
journey through life, and not merely to get him ready for an examination; but
although the meaning of education has thus become more apparent, there is still
too much a tendency in the present day to burden the developing mind with a
multiplicity of subjects. We do not wish to produce a living encyclopaedia, but we
desire to create a being, well trained in all his senses, and thoroughly competent
to take his part in the battle of life. Far be it from imagining that I decry the
advantages of learning in the slightest degree, but surely there is the broadest
distinction between a scholastic prodigy and a practical well-informed mortal.
This exaggeration of the function of education expressed by the word multiplicity
deserves a little consideration, for it would appear that our educationists overlook
the fact that the organism with which they have to deal is going through the most
critical period of its existence. At the very time that children are rapidly
undergoing the process of physical development, there is superadded the
acquirement of elaborate mental knowledge, and when bone and muscle and sinew
are in the active processes of transformation and growth, then it is that the
intellectual faculties are spurred on at a killing pace. The child leaves school in the
afternoon with a load of home lessons to be prepared for the following day. The
very meaning of the word school has become distorted; instead of being a medium
for imparting instruction, it threatens to become merely a building in which the
lessons learned at home overnight are heard, and besides this, if the school
is thus to become simply a place for hearing lessons, the office of schoolmaster
must correspondingly suffer. This I hope will never be, for it would at once take
away all personality from the teacher, and transmute him into a mere auditory
machine. His individuality would become lost in the official, and teaching as
teaching resolve itself into a stereotyped function; and this latter consideration
leads me to remark that one man has the gift of imparting knowledge, in which
another fails entirely. One instructor has a way of putting things so that they ale
retained in the memory of his pupils for ever, while another so fails to express
himself that not one clear idea is carried away by his hearers.
The chief purpose of education should be the preparation of the young for their
adult life. As Agesilaus the Great observed when one asked him what boys should
learn: "That," said he, "which they shall use when men." But the future of the two
sexes differs entirely after school life is over. It will follow, therefore, that there
should be an essential difference between the education required for the boy and
that for the girl. In our present day system of education, however, there is too
much a disposition to make no such distinction. The boy in the greater number of
cases is the bread-winner, and has to rely on his own exertions, whether they be
manual or mental. The girl, on the other hand, looks forward to the destiny of
housewife. This aspect of the educational problem certainly deserves to have
more attention paid to it than it has yet received. Still a step in the light direction
has been made by James Platt, the author of many valuable works on currency,
finance, &c., who advocates that business habits and kindred matters should be
taught to all youths. Of course it is not intended that the sole object of
education should be the principles of money making, but at the same time there is
a considerable amount of truth in his contention. But the chief purpose I have in
view is to advocate a thorough and systematic teaching of Cookery to girls. In the
remaining part of this chapter, therefore, I shall endeavour to bring forward
reasons in support of my proposition.
COOKERY INSTRUCTION IN ENGLAND, NEW SOUTH WALES, AND
VICTORIA.
Under this heading I propose to describe briefly what is being done in connection
with Cookery Instruction in the places mentioned. Now the principal object I have in
view is to further the teaching of Cookery to girls during school life. It will,
however, somewhat strengthen my advocacy if I refer to the beginning of this
movement in England, for it undoubtedly had its origin in causes quite outside of
any educational system. There is no question but that the increased facilities for
communication, resulting from the advent of steamships and railways, gave to
travel an impetus it never before experienced. And as a result thousands of
people in the old country acquired a practical knowledge of Continental life, which
would otherwise never have been theirs. These travellers saw for themselves the
perfection of Cookery in countries like France, and naturally their eyes were
opened to the neglect which culinary matters received in their own land; at least,
this seems to me a satisfactory explanation of what has occurred, and I put it
forward, therefore, purely as a matter of personal opinion, and whether this is the
right reason or not, it is quite certain that a desire for improvement in this
direction is insensibly coming over our English people.
It would seem that Mr. Buckmaster gave a series of lectures in the
Cookery School at the International Exhibition in 1873 and 1874. As a considerable
portion of space was devoted to food, it was rightly thought that some practical
remark on the subject would prove of distinct advantage. Just about this time,
too, in 1874, a good start was made by the establishment of a National Training
School for Cookery at South Kensington. From its inception success seemed to
smile upon it. Its numbers began to increase, steadily at first, and afterwards by
leaps and bounds. It clearly filled a place that had been wanting; and moreover, the
objects it had in view were identified with all that was praiseworthy. It was proof
positive of the long cherished opinion as to the neglect of Cookery in a girl's
education.
Its courses of instruction are for educated persons who desire to qualify
themselves to become teachers of Cookery; for students and cooks; and for
those who wish to be able to cook in their own homes. Its distinctive feature,
however, lies in its artisan kitchen. It is by means of this that families, which
spend from seven to twenty shillings weekly in the purchase of food, will be so
greatly benefitted. Nothing can exceed this in importance, for any improvement in
the Cookery of the whole bulk of the people becomes a matter of national welfare.
A conspicuous instance of the success which has attended the establishment of
the National Training School for Cookery is the almost annual appearance of a new
edition of its hand-book, which is published under its auspices. Therein will be
found a most detailed account of the steps necessary for the preparation of
innumerable dishes, and the different instructions are given with a minuteness
which leaves nothing to be desired.
At this period, also, the Masters of the Cooks' Company, not to be outdone in
anything calculated to promote the progress of the culinary art, had several
young girls brought from ward schools, and taught in the artisan kitchen already
referred to. Indeed, they were instructed entirely at the expense of the Company.
This was liberality of the most commendable kind, and it is satisfactory to see a
corporate body acting in such a practical fashion. An ounce of practice is worth a
pound of theory.
This growing recognition of the importance of Cookery in the old country at last
spread to the educational world, although it has not yet obtained that position
which it must eventually acquire; but the ball has been set rolling in the right path,
and the necessity for instruction in the culinary art is so self-evident, that there
can be no doubt as to the ultimate result. It is gratifying in this connection,
therefore, to know that the kindred subject of Elementary Laundry Work has now
become part of a girl's education. The Education Code of 1890 contains specific
reference to the fact that special and appropriate provision has been made for
the practical teaching of Laundry Work, and is also accompanied by instructions to
the effect that the appliances and methods employed in teaching should be those
which are possible in the homes of working people. I have referred to this in
passing, as it directly concerns the point at issue.
It would have been a matter of considerable difficulty for a private individual like
myself to have collected authentic information relative to the present status of
Cookery in English and Australian schools. Under these circumstances, therefore, I
deemed it best to apply directly to head-quarters for official statements. Mr.
Edwin Johnson, the courteous Under-Secretary for Public Instruction in New South
Wales, willingly undertook to place me in possession of all the facts I required as
far as England and this colony are concerned. I shall, therefore, give his
account of what is being done in the old country; and next condense from his
remarks the substance of what has taken place in New South Wales with regard to
this vital matter.
In England, the Education Department conditionally wants aid to Cookery
Instruction in connection with State Aided Primary Schools under the following
stipulations: what provision as to buildings, &c., has been made for Cookery
Instruction in accordance with the conditions prescribed. The Department then
grants aid at the rate of four shillings per head in day schools, and two shillings
per head in evening, or, as they are sometimes called, "continuation" schools, on
the number of pupils in the fourth and higher standards presented for examination
in Cookery. The classes are taught by ordinary Primary School Teachers who have
been trained in Cookery work, and have obtained certificates of qualifications.
Under the London School Board, Cookery classes are established in different
centres in connection with a large number of the schools; and to a less extent
similar classes are organized by the School Boards of some of the larger country
towns. Grants from the Education Department are annually obtained for the work
by these schools.
In New South Wales, the teaching of Cookery in connection with the Public Schools
has long been advocated; and about ten years ago, special lectures on the subject,
and demonstrations, were given under authority; these did not, however, then lead
to any practical results. Early in 1886, Mrs. Fawcett Story, who had previously
taught Cookery successfully in connection with the Sydney Technical College, was
appointed, on probation, lecturer and demonstrator in Cookery and Domestic
Economy to the students at Hurlstone Training College, the object being to qualify
such students as Instructors of Cookery for schools in which they would in
the future be employed as teachers. After three months successful work at
Hurlstone, Mrs. Story's appointment was confirmed and she has continued to
carry on the work. At first appointed "Instructress," she now takes rank as
"Directress of Cookery."
In 1889 a Cookery class was established at the Fort Street Public School, and this
proving successful, the instruction was extended to other schools. Three classes
of work were embodied in the plan arranged to be carried out, namely: --
1. An Elementary Cookery Course,
2. A Plain, or Intermediate Cookery Course,
3. A Teachers' Course,
and at the close of 1890 the numbers receiving instruction had reached 270.
In 1891 the work was extended to the Sydney and Suburban Schools. Classes were
also established in connection with those of Bathurst and Goulburn, and
arrangements for training a class of Pupil Teachers in this important work were
made and carried out. In 1891 the number under Cookery Instruction in connection
with the school reached 757, and during the year 1892 arrangements were also
made for extending Cookery Instruction among the masses of the people on the
basis already described.
It should also be remembered that classes for Cookery Instruction have for some
years past been established in connection with the Technical College in Sydney,
and more recently in the similar colleges of the larger towns and centres.
As far as Victoria is concerned, I am under considerable obligation to Mr. T.
Brodribb, the Secretary of the Education Office, Melbourne, for the following
information. It would appear that although the subject has not been systematically
taught throughout the schools, instruction in Cookery has been given by experts
to the elder female pupils in a number of Metropolitan State Schools for the past
two years; two courses of 12 lessons being undertaken in each school between
the months of April and November. The instruction has consisted of the
preparation of plain wholesome dishes and sickroom Cookery; the proper care and
arrangement of the various utensils employed forming an important part of each
lesson. Reports obtained from Head Teachers show that, in most cases, the
lessons were productive of much benefit to the children, and were thoroughly
appreciated. At present, however, the teaching of the subject has been
temporarily interrupted; but it is to be hoped that before long a recognition of its
vital importance will enable measures to be taken for its permanent continuance.
COOKERY IN ITS RELATION TO HEALTH.
We are drawing nearer and nearer to an appreciation of the power which Cookery
wields in the preservation of health, but this awakening as to its value has been
too tardy, indeed, it has been from a slumber of centuries. Not that good Cookery
has not been practised from time immemorial, but its recognition from a scientific
point of view is almost within our own day; and even at the present time, dietetics,
or that department of medicine which relates to food and diet, is only gradually
assuming a position which is destined ultimately to become second to none.
Moreover, there is still ample room for improvement in this direction, and matters
will not be rectified till a comprehensive study of food and its preparation, both
for the healthy as well as the sick, is embodied in the curriculum of modern
medical education.
Not so long ago The Lancet made reference to the Edinburgh School of Cookery
and Domestic Economy, which had been opened by the Princess Louise. It was
pointed out that good cookery had more to do with health and comfort, and
therefore with domestic happiness, than any other known accomplishment. In the
same article, moreover, it was remarked that it would be out of all keeping with
the position of Edinburgh as a medical centre, if the importance, in sickness, of
good cookery and suitable food were not fully recognised. In conclusion, the same
authority expressed the hope that this commendable example would be adopted by
many other towns.
All this is satisfactory in showing that the preparation of food for the table is a
subject which can no longer be pooh-poohed, and there are other signs and tokens
which unmistakably point to the same conclusion. As a proof of this it is only
necessary to point to the fact that eminent physicians have written prefaces to
works on cookery, and more than this, have contributed to the literature of the
same. There is a very excellent handbook by Phillis Browne, to which the late Sir J.
Risdon Bennett, a former President of the Royal College of Physicians, London,
contributed the prefatory note. In it he remarks, the value of wholesome and
properly-cooked food has never been sufficiently understood or appreciated in the
United Kingdom. "In scarcely any other country," says he, "does so much
prejudice and ignorance prevail on the subject of food and its employment." And in
proceeding to speak of the growing tendency to make instruction in cookery a
part of ordinary education, he adds that this must be a subject for sincere
rejoicing with those who desire both the moral and physical welfare of the poorer
classes. This is not the only evidence of interest which the same physician took in
this matter, for he has also written an admirable and lengthy article on Food and
its Uses in Health.
But there is another writer to whom the English speaking people are deeply
indebted for a knowledge of all that pertains to food and cookery; I refer to
Sir Henry Thompson, the eminent London surgeon. His work on Food and Feeding
has already run through six editions, and one can only hope that he will long be
enabled to benefit his race by a succession of issues. He has written other
volumes on the same subject, and further, by his contributions to The Nineteenth
Century and The Lancet, he has materially raised the status of the culinary art.
And there are also quite a number of works on diet, and on food, written by
well-known authorities in the medical world, so that the science of dietetics must
eventually attain an unassailable position.
The preceding naturally leads up to the main point, namely, the controlling
influence which cookery exercises over health. Now if I were asked to name the
one single cause which produces more indigestion than anything else, I should
unhesitatingly answer, bad Cookery. Many people Fun away with the idea that good
Cookery is necessarily elaborate Cookery, and that in consequence it is quite
beyond the ordinary purse. Such is not, by any means, the case, and as a matter
of fact good Cookery aims at getting the best possible results at the least
possible cost. Herein lies the excellence of French Cookery, and as I have occasion
to remark elsewhere, the bulk of the population in that country live infinitely
better than does the average Briton.
Indigestion, then, is the great primary result of bad cookery. But, on the other
hand, let us hear what Dr. Lauder Brunton has to say on the score of food when
properly prepared. "Savoury food," says he, "causes the digestive juices to be
freely secreted; well cooked and palatable food is therefore more digestible than
unpalatable, and if the food lacks savour, a desire naturally arises to supply it by
condiments, not always well selected or wholesome."
But important as good Cookery, in itself, may be in its influence upon health, there
is still another essential, which must not be overlooked. And it is that of
variety. The oft-quoted phrase of toujours perdrix bears upon this very point. It
is a way of saying that even a luscious dish when constantly repeated becomes
wearisome, or, in other words, that there is too much of the same thing over and
over again. And if a ceaseless repetition of the same dish - however well it may be
cooked - palls upon the palate, it is at least certain that it is equally burdensome
to the stomach. Dr. Horace Dobell well expresses this fact when he says that it is
of the highest importance to avoid unnecessarily limiting the variety of food
allowed to all persons, but especially to those of poor appetites and troublesome
digestions. Monotonous, uninteresting meals depress the spirits and are
subversive of appetite, digestion, and nutrition.
COOKERY AS A PREVENTIVE OF DRUNKENNESS.
Plutarch tells us that Themistocles laughing at his own son, who got his mother,
and by his mother's means his father also, to indulge him, said to the boy that he
had the most power of anyone in Greece: "For the Athenians command the rest of
Greece, I command the Athenians, your mother commands me, and you command
your mother." In the same way it is easy to make a defective system of education
responsible for much of the existing drunkenness. First of all we have a scheme of
education which fails to provide instruction in a girl's domestic duties; then we
have the wife who undertakes the task for which she has never been properly
trained; next, instead of well-cooked and very much varied meals, we have a
conspicuous and a disastrous failure; and finally, we have the bread-winner driven
to the public-house -- and happiness has left that home for ever. But this is an old
story, yet, unfortunately, it is a true one; and it will continue to be true until a
clearer perception of what a domestic training should be is more
universally recognised. I am sure that I do not exaggerate when I say that millions
of our English-speaking race are living this life without the slightest glimmering of
what domestic content might be theirs. Surely the word "home" for the artisan
should signify something more than a place where he is badly fed. Still, it is a
solemn fact that no more concrete definition of the word has ever been
forthcoming. Now, such a state of affairs cannot be excused on the score of
expense, for the crowning triumph of good Cookery is its very cheapness.
It has already been mentioned that the late Sir J. Risdon Bennett did not think it
beneath his dignity to write a prefatory note to a Cookery Book. He has also
pointed out that Cookery is a subject which deserves more attention at the hands
of those who have the welfare of temperance at heart. He believed that a
knowledge of wholesome Cookery would do much to make home happy; to keep the
men away from dissipation and intemperance; and to make the children healthy
and cheerful. The same idea is expressed by Sylvester, who remarked that
Cookery should be most popular, because every individual human being is directly
interested in its success. As he says, the real comfort of the majority of men is
sought for in their own homes, and every effort should be made to increase
domestic happiness by inducing them to remain at home. And long, long ago a
quaint old book, Markham's English Housewife, published in 1637, contained the
idea in a nutshell, as the following quotation will show: "To speak, then, of the
knowledges which belong to our English housewife, I hold the most principal to be a
perfect skill in Cookery. She that is utterly ignorant therein, may not, by the laws
of strict justice, challenge the freedom of marriage -- because, indeed, shee can
perform but half her vow -- shee may love and obey, but shee cannot cherish and
keepe her husband."
Opinions such as these are based on the soundest common sense, indeed
no one could honestly oppose them. But it powerfully adds to their weight to find
them thoroughly endorsed by the representative medical authority of The British
Medical Journal and The Lancet; the former has from time to time insisted
upon the self-same truths, and strenuously urged their practical adoption. These
contributions are somewhat too lengthy for complete reproduction, but the views
expressed may be briefly referred to. It was maintained that English people have
much to learn from the French methods of Cookery; that these are not merely
tasteful and appetising, but that they are extremely economical; that materials
which the English housewife throws away as useless, her French sister skilfully
converts into toothsome and nutritious food; and that it is only an increased
knowledge of Cookery which the poor need to render life more agreeable.
The Lancet also, in an admirable article on "Culinary Civilisation," spoke of the
need of women becoming acquainted with the modes of concocting palatable food,
if they wished to maintain their domestic power. It was further pointed out that if
the husband was to be prevented from neglecting his family, the wife must see
that he had well-cooked food at home. And lastly, it was tellingly set forth that
when women had fully mastered this lesson a step in civilisation would have been
gained, which would show in increased health, increased prosperity, and happier
domestic hearths.
But I cannot conclude this portion without a special reference to some remarks by
Madame Emilie Lebour-Fawssett. They occur in her most admirable book French
Cookery for Ladies, and are so sensible that they should never be forgotten. "I
like," says Madame, "to place before my husband, who has been hard at work all
day long, a nice tempting dinner, very much varied and well cooked; and I cannot,
repeat it too often, it is one of the strongest ties of home life, and I am sure
many a man in the day, when he is most busy, unconsciously smiles inwardly at the
prospect of the nice little dinner awaiting him at home, when his hard day's work is
over. Small, dainty, well-made dishes gratify your husband's appetite, help to keep
him healthy, prepare him a good digestion for his old age, and save your purse."
In another part of the book, a little farther on, she remarks:- - "One of my chief
objects also is to teach the great mass of people to make better use of the
numberless good things there are to be obtained, and thereby keep their husbands
away from the public-house. It stands to reason that if a man who has worked all
day comes home and finds nothing warm and appetising prepared for him, he will
go away quicker than he came, and spend at the first hotel the money he would
otherwise have gladly spent on his family if his wife had tried and knew how to
make him comfortable; and, there is no denying it, the greatest comforts a man
can have after a day's work, be it manual labour or brain work, are a good meal
and a quiet corner in which to smoke his pipe or cigar."
COOKERY IN THE FORMATION OF CHARACTER.
Yet, valuable as it may be in all these foregoing respects, Cookery has something
more to recommend it, which gives it precedence before everything else in
education; and though this is saying a great deal, I shall endeavour to demonstrate
that it is perfectly true. I have already shown that Cookery is of superlative
benefit, both in ensuring health and in acting as a preventive against habits of
intemperance. But it is as a medium for training that Cookery is at its very best;
for it is in reality an art; indeed, it is a master art. At the same time, also, it is a
science - the science of applied chemistry. There are no other elements of
education which thus blend within themselves these two factors -- the practical
and the scientific.
To commence with, Cookery requires accuracy. The instructions given with any
recipe are sufficient to show this. They tell you to take so much of each thing, to
proceed in a certain way, and even what time to take in the cooking. It also calls
for attention to detail. Carelessness in Cookery is just one of the rocks on which
disaster occurs. An English duke, an ambassador at Paris, was desirous of giving
the corps diplomatique the treat of a real English plum pudding. The fullest
directions were given to his chef -- all, indeed, with the exception of mentioning
the pudding-cloth. When the eventful time arrived for its appearance, to his
dismay several stately cooks appeared, each carrying a tureen of dark-looking
fluid. The omission of the pudding-cloth was fatal. Cleanliness is another of the
cardinal virtues of Cookery. The very thought of anything else would be repulsive.
By the way, that fine old saying, "Cleanliness is next to Godliness," does not come
from the Scriptures, as many suppose, but from one of John Wesley's sermons.
Cookery also exacts punctuality -- for have we not Brillat-Savarin's dictum that
of all the qualities necessary for a cook the most indispensable is punctuality? If
any important matter connected with the process of Cookery be not attended to
at the exact moment it is required, nothing can afterwards rectify it. A little
delay in attending to this thing, or a little delay in attending to that thing, and
whatever is being cooked is irretrievably spoiled. And, moreover, it is not to be
forgotten that cookery is of signal benefit in inculcating the advantages of a wise
economy. With proper Cookery nothing should be allowed to go to waste, nothing
should be thrown away, unless it be absolutely useless. There should be
good housewifery; everything, even the veriest scraps, may be turned to the best
account. The stock pot will absorb many nutritious and wholesome odds and ends,
which would otherwise be consigned to the dirt-box. The loss that actually takes
place in many kitchens is without the shadow of an excuse; sometimes the best
part of a cold joint is deliberately cast aside.
A NATIONAL PLEA ON BEHALF OF AUSTRALIAN SCHOOL
COOKERY.
But there is still something else to be urged on behalf of Cookery, and of School
Cookery in particular, which places it immeasurably before even the preceding. I
have claimed for Cookery that it develops certain habits which are of the greatest
importance in the formation of character; yet, as I have just remarked, there is
something more than this, which renders it of priceless value, and of what this
consists I shall do my best to explain.
Every one who has the welfare of Australia and of Australians at heart must feel
no little concern at that growing indifference to domestic life which is so much the
characteristic of our girls. Once a girl has left school, she seems to think that the
household is no longer any place for her; she consequently ceases to take any
interest whatever in the many matters which constitute the management of a
home: her one aim is to get into " business," as it is called. It appears to be
immaterial whether she is to be a dressmaker, or milliner, or saleswoman, or
employee in a large establishment, as long as she gets away from home.
Now, all this is greatly to be deplored, and has a disastrous influence over the
whole of Australian family life, because it must happen that many of these girls
eventually marry, and commence their new existence under the most
unfavourable conditions. In the first place, they are totally ignorant of everything
connected with household management, and what is far worse, they have almost a
contempt for it. What the result is, in too many cases, I have already dwelt upon, -
either the husband and the family suffer from the effects of bad Cookery, and
unhappiness and ill-health follow, or else the bread-winner flies to alcohol in order
to forget his troubles.
It must not be imagined however, that this condition of affairs is altogether
beyond remedy, and that our Australian girls are hopeless in this respect. No, on
the contrary, those of whom I have just spoken are as attractive and fascinating -
as Australian girls always are; but it is a thousand pities that they do not possess
a greater appreciation of the importance of home life. Still, after all, may it not be
that our educational system is defective in that it does not implant - all through a
girl's school life - a love of Cookery, and of domestic management? It is during this
impressionable age that all these truths can be so well indoctrinated. Indeed, I am
thoroughly convinced that one of the greatest defects in the superlatively
scientific education of to-day, as far as the girls are concerned, is the neglect
which these matters receive; for it stands to reason that if they are passed by
during school life, they are never learnt at all.
And, further, it should not be forgotten that a cook is always able to command
high wages. That is a fact which should not be lost sight of, although perhaps it is
some what mercenary. A cook need never fear but that she will always be in
constant employment. Ah, yes! Max O'Rell got in a home thrust when he declared
that "the average woman who finds herself alone in the world could earn her living
if she could cook - but she can't."
IT is somewhat curious that, among the many questions which pertain to the
national life of Australia, little, if any, attention has been directed to the
influences which the daily food and habitual dietary exercise upon the present, and
in what way they will affect the future population. And yet it must be apparent
that the life of a nation is moulded in no small degree by its daily fare, by its
general food habits, and still more by the fact of its living in conformity with, or in
direct opposition to, its climatic requirements. It is evident that the natural
dietary of the earth's inhabitants is controlled largely by the particular region in
which they dwell. Thus the Hindoos, and contiguous Eastern nations, subsist mainly
upon the cereals, in which rice plays so prominent a part. The Greenlander's fare,
on the contrary, consists almost entirely of oils and fats; indeed, on this point Sir
Anthony Carlisle relates the following anecdote: - "The most Northern races of
mankind," says he, "were found to be unacquainted with the taste of sweets, and
their infants made wry faces and sputtered out sugar with disgust, but the little
urchins grinned with ecstasy at the sight of a bit of whale's blubber." In the same
way the Arab is a date-eater and the Kaffir is a milk consumer. These facts being
borne in mind, it will be desirable to ascertain whether the usual food habits
obtaining in Australia are those which the nature of the climate renders advisable.
If, as a result of such an inquiry, it be demonstrated that the dietary customs
followed here are not in harmony with the climatic conditions, it would,
perhaps, be well to suggest in what direction amendment should take place.
A reference to the isothermal lines in any physical atlas will be of considerable
value in assisting us to the elucidation of the subject under consideration. These
are certain lines drawn over a chart of the earth's surface, on which are located
those cities and regions where the mean annual temperature is the same. Thus
the mean annual temperature of Sydney is 62.9¡; the corresponding line in the
northern world runs through Naples and Lisbon in Europe, and a little below the
central portion of the United States and California in America. At Melbourne the
average yearly temperature is 57.6¡, corresponding in the old world to a
temperature met with at Marseilles, Bordeaux, the south of France and Northern
Italy, while across the Atlantic a somewhat similar climate obtains about the
middle of the United States. The mean annual temperature at Brisbane is 67.74¡;
this is the same as that of Algiers and the southern shores of the Mediterranean
generally, and coincides with that met with in New Orleans and the southern states
of North America. At Adelaide the average yearly temperature is 63.1¡, and the
climate is considered to greatly resemble that of Sicily. Now, no other mode that I
am aware of, such as this juxtaposition of localities where the mean annual
temperature is the same, will afford such a convenient way of contrasting the
mode of living which is practised in Australia with that which is followed by the
inhabitants of the regions referred to in Europe. The cardinal difference, and one
which stands out in bold relief, is that the Australian food habits are
characterised by a preponderancy of meat diet and a corresponding neglect of
vegetable products. On the other hand, the dietary of Southern Europe is in
rational harmony with its climate, and there is not that insensate
insistence of a highly nitrogenous animal fare to the exclusion of all else. The
striking features, then, in connection with the Australian dietary are this
extraordinary consumption of meat and the faith which is presumably attached to
its food value. It is no exaggeration to say that the vast majority of our people
believe implicitly in the necessity for meat at their three daily mealy, and not only
is this the case in the cooler parts of the year, but it is practised universally
during the height of the summer, without being modified in the slightest degree.
Thus the student of ethnography is presented with the somewhat curious anomaly
of a people living in a summer temperature of 70¡ or 80¡ in the shade, eating more
meat than do the bulk of the inhabitants of Great Britain and Ireland (with their ice
and snow) during their winter months. It is one of the characteristics of the
Anglo-Saxon race, however, this inability to appreciate the necessity of
conforming to new climatic conditions in which their lot may be cast. It will be the
same, too, when the British restaurant-keeper begins business in Equatorial
Africa. For an absolute certainty his bill-of-fare for the delectation of the
unfortunate colonist will consist of roast beef, Yorkshire pudding, plum pudding,
and the old familiar throng. Whether mine host has to consult the taste of his
client, or whether the latter has simply to accept what is proffered, is not
absolutely decided; probably they are both imbued with a belief in the necessity of
solid fare, regarding it as a solemn truth beyond all possibility of cavil.
This abuse of flesh food in a climate like Australia would be serious enough under
any circumstances, but it is intensified and aggravated by the direct unoriginality
in dealing with meat. Is it not a fact that there is no attempt whatever made to
break through the conventional chain of joints, roasted or boiled, and the
inevitable grill or fry? In how many houses does the breakfast ever consist
of anything but the ubiquitous chops, steaks, or sausages? indeed, one might
almost term them "the faith, hope, and charity" of domestic life. I remember
reading some little time ago that if a map of the world were made in which lands of
utter darkness were coloured black like the coalfields in an atlas of physical
geography, certain races would be signalised by their opaqueness. If such a map
were ever compiled, Australia would of necessity be characterised by blackness;
such a blackness, indeed, that jet itself would be as snowy white beside it. But why
should this lamentable state of things be said of Australians, who claim to be
progressive in their ideas and advanced in their views, usages, and customs?
In conjunction with this dietetic view of the matter, one of the objects I have in
writing is to direct attention to the great neglect there is of vegetables,
especially those of the more unknown varieties, as an agreeable, desirable,
palatable, and salutary element in the Australian food life. One need not be a
vegetarian to properly appreciate the valuable properties of vegetables, and most
people will fare better and feel the benefit of a modification of their customary
dietary if they decrease the amount of meat they indulge in and proportionately
increase their vegetable allowance. Now, there are many vegetables besides those
ordinarily in use which might be easily cultivated, and serve to form a pleasing
variety at table. Once the demand arises for kinds other than those usually grown,
the inducement for market-gardeners to supply them would be no longer wanting.
A reference to the catalogues furnished by the seedsmen and plant-merchants of
the different Australian metropolitan cities will show that special attention is
called to many of these vegetables, and yet I am informed that, although they are
continually inserted in the new issues as they appear from time to time, no
notice seems to be taken of them whatever. I propose, therefore, briefly to
describe some of these comparatively unknown vegetables, and to point out their
merits and their claims for recognition.
The globe artichoke might be more frequently grown, as it is really a good
vegetable and easily cooked. It constitutes the flower head of the Cynara
scolymus (one of the thistle family), and is gathered before the flowers expand.
The ends of the flower scales attached to the disc, and the central disc itself, are
the parts that are eaten, and they constitute a delicately flavoured vegetable. It
is extensively cultivated in California, and is there to be met with in nearly all
hotels and restaurants. Another thing in its favour is that it is peculiarly one of
the vegetables which diabetics may indulge in without fear. It does well in the
cooler parts of Australia, and should certainly be more generally grown.
The Jerusalem artichoke is not to be confused with the preceding, as it belongs to
a different vegetable genus altogether. It is a species of sunflower, as its name
denotes, the prefix Jerusalem being in reality a corruption of the Italian word
girasole, a sunflower. It resembles the potato in that it is a tuberous-rooted
vegetable, and grows readily enough -- in fact, perhaps it grows too readily, for
once it takes possession of the soil it is difficult to eradicate it. The Jerusalem
artichoke, however, is comparatively common here, and when cooked properly it is
a most delightful vegetable, although it may not be sufficiently appreciated at
first. It often happens that these artichokes are of a bad colour, and too crisp
when brought to table. This is easily prevented, however, by washing and paring
them like potatoes and then placing them in a bowl of clear water, to which a few
drops of fresh lemon juice have been added. When boiled with sufficient water to
just cover them, and a liberal allowance of salt, for 20 min. to 40 min.,
they come out a snowy white and quite tender. They are especially delicious when
served up with melted butter and egg sauce.
Asparagus. -- Although this delicate and luscious vegetable is of the easiest
culture, and grows readily along the coast, yet to our shame be it said that it is
usually too much of a luxury for ordinary mortal, to afford. Now, it is for the most
part such a general favourite that one may well ask why it is not more cultivated.
The demand for it in America is so great, and it yields such a good return, that
some growers, make 100% and upwards yearly profit for each acre. Is it
not a severe reflection upon our market gardeners, to find that the imported
preserved varieties of asparagus are so esculent that the very stalks, are as,
luscious as the heads of the vegetable? In its fresh state it should be eaten as
soon after cutting as possible, and, like the globe artichoke, is readily allowable to
diabetics. It is somewhat curious, too, that the asparagus, and the globe artichoke
are the only vegetables which the British race eat as, a single dish.
Brussels sprouts are the most delicate of all the borecoles, and it is a thousand
pities that this delightful vegetable is not more often to be met with. These
miniature, cabbages, however, require some little care in their rearing, and hence
amateurs often fail to reach perfection in their cultivation. They may be boiled like
cabbage, in abundance of water and a little salt for 15 minutes, then drained,
dried, and finally tossed in butter with a little pepper and nutmeg. They do well
enough, as does the borecole or kale itself, in all the cooler parts of Australia.
The cardoon, like the globe artichoke, belongs to the thistle family, yet it is, more
hardy and robust than the latter. It is readily grown, particularly in the cooler
districts, and, like many other of the more unknown vegetables, is too
much neglected. Its leaf-stalks should be at least an inch and a half thick before
they are ready for cutting. They are then blanched, and when cooked recall
somewhat the flavour of the globe artichoke. These tender leaf-stalks are used in
soups and salads, and it may be boiled also in a similar manner to sea-kale, in
which latter form it is especially palatable.
The celeriac or turnip-rooted celery is a very choice vegetable, and is much
cultivated on the Continent. Its nutty root is not at all unlike the solid root portion
of common celery in taste, which by many is considered superior in flavour to the
other parts of the latter plant. The celeriac is greatly esteemed, and is known as
the celeri-rave by the French, and as the knoll-selerie by the Germans. The
latter, indeed, are so fond of it that they call barely talk of it without moist eyes
and watery mouths. It is hardier than celery, and possesses an advantage in that
it can be taken up and stored similarly to carrots and beets. The celerific may be
boiled as a table vegetable or used for flavouring soups, or it may be sliced for
salads. It does well in all the cooler parts, and might be cultivated with benefit,
mingled with gratitude.
The egg plant, or aubergine, does so exceedingly well, and can be so highly
recommended, that one may well wonder why it is never seen. It is a native of
Africa and tropical America, and is very popular both in the East and West Indies.
It is cultivated also a great deal in the United States, where it is greatly
appreciated for culinary use. In aubergines farcies, a favourite dish, they are cut
in hakes, the centres chopped and put back into the skins with oil, &c. They are
then sprinkled with breadcrumbs, and browned. It is easily grown, and it seems
unaccountable why it should be passed over.
The kohl rabi, or turnip-rooted cabbage, is another nutritious vegetable which has
inexplicably never been received into public favour. Its delicate flavour
should ensure for it a well-established position with those who are fond of good
vegetables, as it is more tender and more savoury than either turnip or cabbage,
and is not at all unlike cauliflower in taste. For table purposes it should be only
about two-thirds grown, for if allowed to go to full size the outside skin becomes
tough and hard. It is another of those vegetables which are so highly prized on the
Continent, and it is already an acknowledged favourite in America. It does well in all
the cooler localities, and gives a larger yield than turnips.
The salsify, or "vegetable oyster," is a typical example of a most unaccountably
slighted vegetable with us, and yet it is highly appreciated on the continent and in
the United States. The root is long and tapering, becoming fleshy and tender by
cultivation, and with a whitish, milky-like juice. It has a rich flavour, not at all unlike
that of cooked oysters, whence it derives its value. In preparing salsify for table
the darkish outside skin requires to be lightly scraped off, and then it should be
steeped for a while in cold water so as to remove any slight bitterness it may
possess. Like parsnips, when cooked it requires to be boiled slowly, in the smallest
possible quantity of water, until it is almost ready to melt. If boiled fast, in
abundance of water, the savour of both parsnips and salsify is to a great extent
dispersed and lost beyond recall. One of the most approved methods of cooking
salsify roots is to slowly boil them to tenderness in the smallest possible quantity
of milk, and then to mash and fry them in butter, with salt and pepper. Cold boiled
salsify, with the addition of some chopped herbs, tarragon vinegar, and salad oil,
makes an exceedingly good salad. The salsify does well in all the cooler regions,
and, moreover, it is easily grown.
Scorzonera. -- This Spanish plant is very similar to salsify, and requires
the same kind of treatment; but, being a stronger grower, requires more room in
its culture. It may be served in soups or treated like salsify. The outside leaves
should be removed before the vegetable is cooked. The blanched leaves also are
highly esteemed on the Continent, and are used for salad purposes. It grows well in
all the cooler parts of Australia, and might certainly be introduced for the public
benefit.
Sea kale is one of those vegetables which are brought to perfection in England, so
much so that Careme, that mighty chef, when he came across them in London
went into ecstasies. He described them as resembling branches of celery, which
should be served like asparagus, with butter sauce, after 20 minutes' boiling. In
some respects this is verily the most delicious of all vegetables, and as it grows
well here it should be largely cultivated, yet it is almost unknown. It is fit to rank
with, if not precede, asparagus, and as a matter of fact it is far more profitable
than the latter, so that market gardeners would have something to gain by its
introduction. Like the cabbage, it was originally a maritime plant, and has been
brought to its present state of perfection by cultivation. It requires to be
thoroughly blanched by exclusion from light, similarly to celery, for when coloured
at all it possesses an acrid taste. Of the many ways of sending it to table, one of
the best is to boil it and serve it on toast with a little melted butter. It should be
largely cultivated, as it does well all along the coastal parts, being, as already
mentioned, a maritime plant.
Sweet corn is deservedly a great favourite with those who know of its succulent
flavour and nourishing properties. Unfortunately, however, it is with us only in the
imported tins from America, and therefore we can only conjecture how
delicious it must be when fresh. It is so commonly met with in the fresh form in
America that it is found at nearly every dinner table. Large areas where land is
not expensive are devoted to its growth, and hundreds of acres are required
annually for the New York markets alone. It does splendidly in all parts of
Australia, and for growing children it constitutes one of the most nutritious
vegetables that can be well imagined. On this latter account alone, therefore, it is
really a matter for national regret that it is so improperly passed over. One thing
requires to be borne in mind, and it is that the cobs of ordinary Indian corn which
are seen in so many country districts must not be confused with this sweet corn,
as the latter is entirely different.
These nutritious, although somewhat unknown vegetables, therefore, evidently
deserve to be brought into prominent notice, and once public interest is aroused,
their cultivation and ready sale will speedily follow. At the same time it must not
be forgotten that the tomato itself had a desperate struggle for reception into
public favour when first introduced to us. It actually trembled in the balance for
no inconsiderable time, and it was some years before its good qualities were
universally recognised. To-day, however, it occupies a very different position, and
takes rank as a luscious vegetable, appreciated by thousands of people; and
besides, it is of undoubted value in many disorders of the liver. But now that the
Agricultural Colleges are in full swing in the different colonies, notably in New
South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia, it is certain that the greatest possible
good to the whole community will result. Their effect, too, in indirectly populating
the agricultural areas of Australia will materially aid the great work of
decentralisation.
But apart altogether from this matter of the introduction of vegetables which
have hitherto been overlooked is another which is hardly less important. I
refer to the crude cookery which is bestowed on the ordinary vegetables at
present in daily use. That there is sny monotony in an endless recurrence of boiled
potatoes, boiled cabbage, boiled this and boiled that, never seems to occur to the
vast majority of people in this country, who seem incapable of understanding that
these different vegetables are worthy of being served in an infinite number of
ways. It will doubtless shock those who cling to this beliefs but the following
remarks by Dr. Mitchell, an English physician practising in Paris, directed against
his own countrymen be it understood, are forcible enough: - "The plain boiled
potato," says he, "whatever else it may be, is clearly a cattle food; so for the
matter of that are cabbages, carrots, turnips, beans, peas, and almost every
other vegetable when plain boiled. None of them in that condition would be
"refused by a cow in fair appetite." Now, there are so many appetising ways of
preparing vegetables for table, and at no additional expense, that it is lamentable
to find people offering no protest against this feeble exhibition of culinary skill.
Why, if there be nothing in the preparation of vegetables for the table beyond
plain boiling, it must be acknowledged that Cookery has made mighty little
progress since the time it first came into existence.
Having seen, then, what faults exist and what improvements might be made, it
may well be asked how these latter are to be brought about, or, rather, how can
Australians be induced to life in accordance with climatic requirements? The
answer Is by no means easy. It may be said, in truth, that till the great mass of
the people recognise their food faults, reform will not be of a national character.
As I have already said, the acceptation of that valuable and nutritious vegetable
fruit, the tomato, took years to accomplish. In the same way, I fear, a universal
recognition that excessive meat indulgence is a climatic error will take
many decades before it is an article of national belief. In the schools, Cookery
must form an all-important part of a girl's education - not a superficial knowledge
of the science, but practical instruction, thorough, complete, real. The dietetic
properties of meat, vegetables, of salad vegetables, and of fruit, from an
Australian standpoint, should be so thoroughly inculcated that a proper conception
of their respective food values should remain for a lifetime. The prizes for
proficiency and excellence in culinary matters, too, should be such as to render
them worth the winning, and serve as a stimulus for future exertions.
Is it not strange that so far ingenuity, universal approval, or general consensus of
opinions call it what you will, has not up till the present given us an Australian
national dish? Although tea and damper instinctively arise in the mind when the
matter is referred to, yet I take it that we would all repel such an accusation if
levelled against us. Does the Australian, moreover, away from his native land
perpetuate his patriotism by oft partaking of this pastoral fare? Certainly not.
Well, when this national dish is composed and formally approved of by the nation,
let us devoutly trust that it will be a mace'doine of vegetables, or a vegetable
curry, or some well-concocted salad. It is true that in one of the cookery books I
have seen a dish of peaches, dubbed Pe'ches a' l'Australienne. It is a sort of
compote of peaches, but to the best of my belief it is simply entitled Australian
for the sake of giving it a name, and for no other reason.
ANYONE looking backwards upon the history of Australia cannot fail to be
impressed by one peculiar feature, which is the more distinctive, too, because it is
in striking contrast with all else. It is the more noteworthy also, because it
affects each individual inhabitant of this island continent, and has a direct bearing
on the daily life of every person is the community. Thus, on the one hand, while we
are nearing a maximum of progress -- or, at any rate, attaining to a high level of
success -- in political matters, in commercial affairs, and in athletic prowess, yet,
on the other, there is unfortunately an apathetic indifference in all that concerns
our public and family food habits, which after all constitute the national
characteristics of any people. It is true that we have gained the dignity of
responsible government, that our wool and frozen meat are entering the markets
of the world, and that in the athletic arena our fame is spread both far and wide.
Yet it must be confessed that our national food-life has not conformed to climatic
requirements in the slightest degree since the memorable day on which Captain
Cook set foot on these shores. As those on the Endeavour lived then, so live are
now. On the continent of Europe it will be found that the manners and customs,
even of contiguous countries, are as widely different as it is possible to imagine.
Surely then, it is, to say the least of it, curious to see the inhabitants of a
semi-tropical country like Australia living in wilful contradiction to their climatic
necessities, and eating the same kind of food as did their fathers in the old land,
with its dampness its coldness, its ice, and its snow.
Yet, notwithstanding the fact that reflections of this kind are interesting
in the highest degree, I propose to do no more than consider the matter
exclusively from the standpoint of the subject heading of this chapter. Here,
again, we are directly confronted with an inexplicable anomaly -- I refer to the
want of enterprise shown in developing the deep-sea fisheries of Australia. Now, if
the dwellers of this land had sprung from an entirely inland race, this would not,
perhaps, have been so difficult to understand; but arising, as we do, from a stock
the most maritime that the world has ever seen, such a defect redounds not to
our credit as inheritors of the old traditions. At our present rate of fisheries
development it will take centuries before we will be able to produce anything to
even approach the International Fisheries exhibition of the old country in 1883. At
that memorable exposition His Royal Highness the Duke of Edinburgh, in the course
of his conference paper, gave expression to the following stirring words: -- "From
the earliest ages the inhabitants of the coast of the British Islands have made the
sea contribute to their food. This pursuit has produced a race of men strong,
inured to hardship and exposure, patient and persevering in their calling, brave,
prompt, and fall of resource in the face of danger; intelligent and amenable to
discipline, from the daily habit of subordinating their own wills to that of anyone
whom they know is placed in authority over them for the, purpose of directing
their labours and working with them for the common benefit; accustomed to
co-operate with others for the attainment of a certain end. These qualities are
not only exercised from early youth, but are inherited and intensified from
generation to generation. The foundations of the great position which this kingdom
has attained amongst the nations of the world must, in some measure, be
attributed to our fishermen, for they were our first sea-men; and, from small
beginnings, our seamen increased in number and in skill, until the whole nation was
leavened with that love of maritime adventure which has resulted in peopling the
uttermost parts of the earth with our race, and in establishing that empire upon
which the sun never ceases to shine. In earlier times our first maritime commerce
must have been conducted by our fishermen, who also manned our fighting navies.
The fisheries of the West of England were the nurseries of the sailors who enabled
Drake to circumnavigate the world, and, as he said, to 'singe the King of Spain's
beard' on more than one memorable occasion."
THE DEFECTIVENESS OF OUR AUSTRALIAN FISH SUPPLY.
That fish should be, comparatively speaking, so scarce in Australia can only be
regarded in the light of a national calamity. And not only is the supply deficient,
but what little there may be is so outrageously expensive that it is hopelessly
beyond the reach of an ordinary purse. It is so excessive in cost that it must
almost be bracketed with poultry as a luxury only to be indulged in after
lengthened periods. I have been told, when making inquiries on this point, that the
reason why fish is so dear is that this is not a fish-eating community, and that
consequently there is no demand for it. But, on the other hand, I find that almost
everyone I ask is really fond of fish, and that they do not eat it simply because
they cannot obtain it at a reasonable price, and this undoubtedly is the true
explanation.
But this same scarcity of fish has exercised other people besides myself, for Mr.
Alexander Oliver and many others have repeatedly drawn attention to the same
deficiency. It has been the primary origin of a Board of Fisheries, it had brought
forth Parliamentary Select Committees, and it has produced endless opinions and
suggestions on the part of the public. Now, I am quite willing to admit that
there should be proper supervision over the working of the Fisheries Acts, and
that existing grievances should be rectified; but, with all due deference, it seems
to me that the finger has not been placed on the exact reason why failure occurs
in our fish supply. For I say this, that you may do what you will to protect and
supervise the shore and inland fisheries, and you may even increase the yield from
these sources to an encouraging extent, but that till the deep-sea work is
thoroughly taken up and properly developed there will be no cheap fish for
Australia. It has been stated that if the deep-sea fisheries of the United Kingdom
fell through from any reason, half-a-million of its inhabitants would be brought
face to face with starvation. And even these enormous figures include only the
fisher-folk themselves, and do not take into account the vast army of buyers,
curers, dealers, &c., who are dependent for their very existence upon the fishing
industry. Take away the deep-sea fisheries from the old country, and its whole
fish supply would practically be at an end. In the same way by the development of
our Australian deep-sea fisheries -- and by the development of the deep-sea
fisheries only -- will it be possible, in my humble opinion, to increase the supply
and cheapen the price of fish so that it will form part of the dietary in every
dwelling.
There was an important select committee appointed by the Victorian Government,
a short time ago, to inquire into the unsatisfactory condition of the fishing
industry there. It examined a great number of witnesses, and its investigations
extended over a large area. Amongst other things, with a view of encouraging
trawling operations, it was suggested --
"That a careful survey be made of the sea-bottom in the neighbourhood of our coasts
and in Bass' Straits, and the part suitable for trawling properly charted.
That a few sets of trawling apparatus of the most modern kind be procured by the
Government, and Applications invited from the fishermen at the various ports for
permission to use these trawls, free of charge, under certain conditions for a limited
period. That the Government fit out a steamer for the purpose of collecting and
conveying to Melbourne the fish obtained by the trawlers, the steamer to be provided
with cooling chambers, &c."
A number of different matters were also considered, and, in addition, it was
thought that, in order to afford the general public greater facilities for obtaining
fish, the sale should not be confined to the metropolitan market. It was,
therefore, recommended that stalls in the various markets for the sale of fish by
auction and otherwise should be opened in the leading suburbs of Melbourne; and
that the corporation officer in the metropolitan market, to whom the fish was
consigned, should regularly distribute to each of these suburban markets such a
quantity of fish as experience would show the particular locality demanded. To a
certain extent all this is very satisfactory, but unfortunately select committees
have arrived at very similar conclusions over and over again. All their
recommendations have never yet been attended by any practical result, and an
adequate fish supply for Australia appears to be as far off as ever.
OUR PRIMITIVE METHODS OF FISH CAPTURE.
About the last place one would expect to come across a really fine piece of
delicate humour is amongst official correspondence, and yet in a formal letter
from Dr. E.P. Ramsay, the Curator of the Australian Museum, to Sir Saul Samuel
the following passage occurs. Speaking of the New South Wales exhibits at the
International Fisheries Exhibition of London, 1883, the doctor proceeds to remark:
-- "People here, imagining that we must have already developed extensive
fisheries, from the large collection of food fishes which we exhibit, were
not less surprised at our very limited materials and methods of capture than at
the immense undeveloped wealth of our fisheries and fish fauna." Now, I venture
to say that a more unconsciously subtle insinuation at the crude methods of fish
capture at present employed in our Australian fisheries was never penned. But
what makes it so keenly effective is that it really hits the right nail on the head. In
giving evidence, also, before Mr. Frank Farnell's select committee of 1889, Dr.
Ramsay, upon being asked whether he thought our fishermen were abreast of the
times with regard to appliances, replied: -- "They are about 200 years behind the
times."
To my mind another most convincing proof of the crude methods of fish capture
employed in Australian waters is to be found in the following. In one of the
Fisheries Reports it is gravely recorded that "some very valuable gear in general
use amongst English, Norwegian, and American fishermen, had been destroyed in
the Garden Palace fire, but that the commissioners had been able to replace the
otter-trawl and the beam-trawl." The very fact that these appliances, in active
use at the present time by those in the foremost front of fishery enterprise, are
regarded in the light of curiosities in Australia, proves only too forcibly the
correctness-of this opinion as to our primitive fishery appliances.
THE BEAM-TRAWL IN DEEP-SEA FISHING.
It must not be imagined that trawling has never been advocated (indeed, it has
even been experimentally practised), for we have only to look through the various
Fisheries Reports to find it repeatedly referred to; unfortunately, however, these
appeals so far have been without any practical results. It will, therefore, be most
instructive to refer briefly to the manner in which trawling and other
modes of deep-sea fishing are carried out elsewhere; and more particularly to
bring under notice the enormous fish yield effected by them. Trawling, or as it is
more properly termed, beam-trawling, may be described as a method of deep-sea
fishing, in which a large bag net is towed along the ground so as to scoop, as it
were, the fish into its receptacle. There are at least several important stations in
England for trawling; some in the English Channel; some on the west, and also on
the Welsh coast; and others again (amongst which is Grimsby, the largest fishing
port in the world) on the east coast on the North Sea. The trawling grounds of the
latter are widely known, and comprise the famous Dogger Bank, which covers
many hundreds of acres in area. In its neighbourhood, also, there are numerous
grounds such as the Inner and Outer Well Banks, and there are others again nearer
the English coast. In addition to these there is the Great Silver Pit, discovered in a
severe winter in 1843; and it has been noticed that during the winter months the
fish frequent the deeper water, because the temperature is more equable than in
shallow places. The depth at which trawling is usually carried on varies from 20 to
30 fathoms; never under any circumstances reaching 50 fathoms -- the depth of
the Silver Pit being from 35 to 45 fathoms.
It was formerly urged against trawling that it was very destructive to the spawn,
at that time supposed to be lying on the sea bottom. But the investigations of the
late Professor Sars, for the Swedish Government, into the spawning habits of sea
fish, have conclusively revealed the fact that the ova of fish float on the surface
of the water during the whole period of their development. Not only have the
floating ova of the cod and haddock been reared, but the common plaice, the
representative of the flatfish family, including the brill, the sole, and the
turbot, is also known to spawn near the surface. The eggs of the mackerel and
the garfish have likewise been found floating, and successfully hatched. Now, no
fish comes so close to the land as does the mackerel, yet it is certain that it
never makes its way into the estuaries and inlets till after spawning is finished --
for that it spawns in the open sea is almost without a doubt. These facts
consequently do away altogether with the old statements concerning the
destructive results of trawling.
The yield from the English trawleries alone is computed to be over 200,000 tons
annually, and as the price for trawled fish at the Billingsgate market averages £12
per ton, this represents about two and a half million pounds. And, in addition to
these weighty figures, Professor Huxley's words deserve to be well remembered,
for, says he, "Were trawl fishing stopped, it would no longer be a case of high
prices, but that ninety-nine out of a hundred would hardly be able to afford any at
all - herrings and a few other fish caught in the old way excepted." Indeed, it is
chiefly by this method of beam trawling that London and the interior are supplied
with brill, turbot, and soles; while by it thousands of tons of plaice, haddock, and
other fish are brought within the reach even of the poorest.
DRIFT-NET AND OTHER DEEP-SEA FISHING.
Important though the beam-trawl may be, there is another mode of deep-sea
fishing which deserves to be well known by us in Australia, and which undoubtedly
must come into general use before we can make any pretensions with regard to
our fisheries. I refer to that by means of drift-nets. As the trawl is absolutely
necessary, on the one hand, for capturing fish which frequent the bottom, so, on
the other, the drift-net is essential for those whose resort is the upper
portion of the sea. It is by this method alone that fish like the herring, the
mackerel, and the pilchard - which may be termed surface fish - are caught in
great quantities for food supply.
Now, in Australia, we have vast shoals of migratory fish visiting the coast at
different periods of the year. During the winter season enormous numbers of
herrings come to these shores, and are permitted to depart without any effort
being made to capture them. Attention has been repeatedly called to this strange
neglect in our fisheries, for this herring is plentiful and is considered to surpass
the famous Scottish herring itself in flavour. The mackerel, too, is to be met with
annually, generally about midwinter, in immense shoals, passing near the coast
upwards in a northerly direction. The sea mullet also makes its appearance
towards the end of the summer months, usually from April to June, at the very
time when it is in splendid condition and full of roe. It is always observed to be
proceeding towards the north in successive shoals and in great numbers. Many
consider its richness and delicacy of flavour to be unequalled. The driftnet system
of fishing would be well adapted for it -- if the meshes were larger than those for
the herring -- as when fully grown it is nearly two feet in length. And lastly, it will
only be necessary to speak of the "maray," which is practically the English
pilchard. As with the fish just mentioned, it is met with about midwinter, passing
up north in countless numbers, sometimes covering miles of sea.
As the name implies, drift-nets are not worked from the shore, but they are
"shot," as the saying is, in the open sea, and allowed to drift in whatever direction
the tide may take them. Each drift-net will measure about 180 feet in length by
about 30 feet in depth. They are secured to one another at the ends to form a
long single line, perhaps two miles in length. By means of floats the nets hang
perpendicularly in the water, thus forming a long wall against which the fish
"strike," and get enmeshed by being caught in the gill opening. The nets are kept
on the stretch by being "shot" in the face of the wind, and the vessel from which
they are paid out, being to leeward of them, drifts more rapidly than they do, and
consequently keeps them well extended.
My object, however, is not so much to enter into the details of these different
methods of deep-sea fishing as to indicate their value and necessity, if we are to
have any fisheries worth speaking of. I shall, therefore, do no more than briefly
mention a few other modes of fish capture. Thus, at the mouth of the Thames,
thousands of tons of sprats are caught every winter by means of the large bag
net, known as the stow net. In shape it is like an enormous funnel, 30 feet high, 20
feet wide, and nearly 180 feet in length. By means of this contrivance the yield of
sprats is so great that there is often some little difficulty in disposing of the
catch. The renowned whitebait, too, which are believed to be young herrings, are
caught by means of a similar, though much smaller, net.
Besides these and various other forms of net fishing, there are the methods in
which the long line is employed. For the capture of the cod, both in Newfoundland
and in the North Sea, what is called the bultow is used. This is a long line many
hundreds of-feet in length, and at every twelfth foot shorter and smaller cords
called "snoods" are fastened. These "snoods" are about 6 feet long, and have the
hooks attached to their free ends. The bultow is "shot" across the tide to
prevent entanglement of the hooks, and is laid in the afternoon. At daybreak,
when the lines are hauled in, as many as 400 of the large cod sometimes result
from the catch. There are various other appliances used for fish capture in
different parts of the world, such as the purse-seine net, the trammel net,
the otter-trawl net, &c.; and, as I have already pointed out, the most scathing
satire on our fisheries is to find all these necessary means for catching fish
regarded as curiosities. When they are no longer considered so, it will be a
fortunate time for Australia.
BENEFITS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR DEEP-SEA FISHERIES.
What would the proper development of our deep-sea fisheries mean? In the first
place, it would lead to a more widely diffused use of fish as an article of diet,
within the easy reach of all classes, being thus of incalculable value from a health
point of view. Next, it would ensure employment to many hundreds, and eventually
to many thousands, both directly and indirectly, and as a natural consequence this
would bring about the creation of a sturdy and desirable maritime element in our
population. And lastly, it would yield a more than satisfactory return on the outlay
invested.
At the present time only the veriest few of our metropolitan population are able
to afford the luxury of fish, and people in the country towns hardly see it at all.
So, too, we are casting about for this plan and for that plan to lessen a growing
difficulty in the Australian metropolitan centres. There are village settlements
(which certainly deserve to be successful), and other proposals made to relieve a
surplus population, but yet no one has suggested the sea as a means of remedying
this congestion. And not only would the fisheries confer upon its followers a
healthy calling, but they would raise a vigorous stock of which Australia might well
be proud. In addition to all this, a proper development of our deep-sea fisheries
would assuredly open up a new avenue for investment. Is it not amazing that men
will risk all they have in mines which are not even real, and which exist, only on
paper? And besides this, in the most genuine mine that was ever worked
there is at least a costly outlay for production, for crushing, or for smelting,
before the metal sees the light of day; but in the sea the catch is ready for the
market, and only requires the bringing to land.
This matter, therefore, must be taken up earnestly, and there must be a
determination to succeed. In the first place, and before all else in the deep-sea
fisheries, I maintain that a proper and systematic search for trawling grounds is
absolutely essential. Till this is done he cannot for a moment pretend that we have
endeavoured to foster them in any way. All the elaboration of your proposed
Fisheries Acts, and all the details connected with the working of what may be
called shore fishing, sink into nothingness when compared with the results which
would follow the working of our deep-sea fisheries. I have already used the
argument before, and do so again, and it is this: that if you were to take away
from the old country her deep-sea fisheries, she would be practically without any
fish supply.
Apparently it is imagined, too, that unless trawling grounds be discovered in the
vicinity of Sydney or Melbourne, all efforts will be useless. But it will only be
necessary to refer to the deep-sea fisheries elsewhere to at once set this
objection aside. Some of the great trawling grounds in the North Sea are at such a
distance from port that it would be quite impossible for any vessel to bring its
own catch to market for disposal, for the fish would be utterly spoiled before it
could be done. But the larger trawling boats go on cruises extending over weeks,
and are constantly visited on the grounds by what are called "carriers," i.e.
steamers, who run their freights directly into market. The same thing is practised
by the Dutch vessels, who fish in the neighbourhood of the Shetland Islands for
weeks together. In the same way carrier vessels attend upon their fishing
fleets, and carry off the take immediately to Holland. Being in possession of these
facts, therefore, we must not be induced to believe that deep-sea fishing is not
possible, simply because suitable grounds for trawling, &c., may not be actually
within coo-ee of the Australian metropolitan centres.
FISH MARKETS OF SYDNEY AND MELBOURNE.
There are one or two matters in connection with this subject which deserve having
attention called to them. In the first place the method adopted in our
Woolloomooloo Fish Market of placing the fish in little heaps on the floor itself,
when put out for sale, is not satisfactory. In the Redfern Fish Market they are
placed in small divisions or receptacles -- each lot by itself -- and raised above
the floor, where they are protected from injury. In the new Melbourne Fish
Markets, there are elevated platforms for the fish, and they are thus quite above
the cemented floor. Not only are they prevented from being damaged, but it
seems to me that the buyers have a better chance of seeing the fish when it is
raised a little distance above their feet.
The size of the fish lots for sale in the Sydney and Melbourne Fish Markets varies,
and this opens up a somewhat debatable point. with us the lots are comparatively
small, both at the Woolloomooloo and at the Redfern Market; while at Melbourne,
on the other hand, the lots are much larger. When the lots are small it gives
private buyers a chance of purchasing (but how many private buyers are there
before breakfast?), and is said in this way to raise the price for the dealers. But
with the larger lots the latter are said to be able to buy to more advantage, and
thus supply the public with cheaper fish. To say which is the better of the
two plans is very much like being asked to solve the query in the story of "The
Lady or the Tiger."
But before leaving this matter I should like to refer briefly to the new markets in
Flinders Street, Melbourne. They are called the City of Melbourne Meat, Fish, and
Farm Produce Markets, and are most extensive in area. The viaduct which
connects the two railway systems of Victoria pierces the very centre of these
new markets. They are replete with every modern appliance for the storage and
disposal of the food supply of a large city. There are numerous chambers for the
frozen meat, and by means of what is called a "lock," a whole train can be
received into a long covered gallery. The two gates are then closed at either end,
and the meat is thus received directly into the freezing chambers, without the
slightest loss of any cold air. The fish and game are treated exactly in the same
way, except that the receiving and delivery "locks" are not quite so large as in the
former case. Still, there is just the same facility for their reception into the
freezing chambers set apart for the purpose. The whole arrangements of these
new fish markets are very perfect, and leave nothing to be desired.
THE "MIDDLEMAN" CONTROVERSY.
This is one of the topics which is continually cropping up in connection with the
fishing industry in Australia. It is noteworthy, too, that the middleman in some
shape or form appears to be part of the system of fish selling in every part of
the world. At Billingsgate, where they are termed "bummarees," it is stated that
they fulfil a useful office in that they act as distributors to the small
costermongers, who could hardly get along without them. The "bummarees" watch
the market and speculate accordingly, and it must be urged for them that they
run great risks from the unexpected arrival of a large amount of fish with
a consequent glut in the market. But the "bummarees" pure and simple are
comparatively few. Their ranks, however, are swelled in the following way: A
salesman, having disposed of his own fish, will "bummaree" for the sake of the
possible profit, or a fishmonger, having purchased a double supply for a cheaper
price, will "bummaree" half his purchase. In France the procedure is different.
First of all there is an agent termed an ecoreur, deputed by various persons and
armed with purchasing power, who is ready to buy the fisherman's catch at once.
This simplifies matters wonderfully for the fisherman, who gets ready money and
has no further bother. Next, from the ecoreur the fish is bought by the
moreyeur, or trader, who despatches it to Paris and the other large cities. Thus,
so far, the fish, after leaving the fisherman, has passed through two hands, those
of the ecoreur, and those of the moreyeur. After this it has to face a most
unjust tax -- the octroi -- by which all provisions are specially taxed before
entering the "barriers" of any French city or town. Hence the initiated, when
travelling in France, often reside on the outskirts of a town, just outside the
barrier, where the cost of living is reduced by one-third. On arriving at the
markets the fish is publicly disposed of by the facteurs a la criee, or
auctioneers, who of course are paid for their trouble. Lastly, it is bought for sale
to the public by the poissarde, or fishwife. And thus we see from the time of
leaving the water till finally it reaches the unfortunate public the fish has passed
through no less than six levies, that by the fisherman, the agent, the trader, the
octroi (i.e. the city toll or town due), the auctioneer, and, finally, that by the
fishwife or costermonger.
Having thus explained the system pursued in England and in France respectively, it
will be interesting to refer briefly to the different methods with regard to the
disposal of fish practised in the Woolloomooloo, the Redfern, and the Melbourne
Fish Markets. At the former, the sales are conducted by Mr. Richard Seymour, the
inspector and auctioneer of the fish market - with other auctioneers -- who act
directly from the Sydney Municipal Council; the Redfern markets are conducted by
the Messrs. Hudson; while in Melbourne there are licensed auctioneers, who pay for
the privilege.
But to return to our middleman, upon whom the whole controversy centres.
Indeed, the discussion over him in Melbourne, not so long ago, might be said to
have reached to a white-heat phase. But the. premises on which the arguments
were based were so hopelessly conflicting that it was impossible to logically settle
the point. It was claimed, on the one hand, that the price the fishermen received
was cruelly small in comparison with that which the public had to pay. On the
other, the contention was that the price paid to the fishermen was fairly
satisfactory, and that the public obtained comparatively cheap fish. We have
seen, however, what takes place in other parts of the world, and, indeed, every
one must admit that there is a remarkable difference between the price which the
fisherman gets and that which the public have to pay. Between these two
extremes there is an inordinate disparity, and the difficulty is to connect the two
together -- to bring to light the leakage - and to find out who is living both on the
fisherman and the public at one and the same time. On this point a recent
Fisheries Report of Victoria says: -- "The solution of the very important question
of providing a larger and cheaper fish supply for the masses rests mainly in the
hands of the public. The present high prices are maintained in virtue of a monopoly
which can be only successfully combated by the initiation of a healthy trade
competition or a more open fish market. The fishermen, under existing auspices,
reap but a small share of the retail produce of their takings, such being further
reduced by the high rates for transport they are called upon to pay. In this
last-named direction some relief might be afforded by the institution, if necessary
by Act of Parliament, of a uniform tariff for the carriage of fish by road and rail
throughout the colony."
THE DISTRIBUTION OF FISH TO THE PUBLIC.
This brings me to one of the most difficult matters that has to be dealt with in
considering the fish supply of any great city. For you may have the most
extensive deep-sea fisheries, you may have the most rapid transit of the fish to
town, and you may have the most commodious fish markets; but if you have no
proper means of distributing the fish to the public the whole scheme falls to the
ground. At present the system both in Sydney and in Melbourne is to have the one
principal fish market (there are now two in Sydney, by the way), from which all
supplies for the public are derived. Of course it is perfectly competent for the
latter to obtain their purchases in the early morning at the time when the sales
are conducted; but, on the other hand, the hour is exceedingly inconvenient, and,
as a general rule, the lots are too large for the private buyer. Hence the
distribution of fish depends almost wholly upon the costermonger or basket-man,
who takes his fish round to the public. The basket-man, or costermonger, or
dealer -- call him what you will -- is an indispensable personage, and what is more,
he fills a most useful office. It is true that he is given to making strange outcries,
and that he is at times boisterous in speech. Yet, notwithstanding these
things, he is a valuable member of society, and personally I have a very great
respect for him. Indeed, I am certain that he is the food-bearer to many homes,
and people would otherwise be put to very great straits in obtaining their supplies.
Our friend, however, has usually a long round to travel before he can make a good
living, and perhaps he is unable to cope with the requirements of his large district.
It is on account of these difficulties, therefore, that I recognise the value of the
French method of distribution, for besides the Halles Centrales, or principal
markets, in Paris, there are in all nearly sixty local provision markets where it is
possible to obtain, under cover - in all weathers and at any time - whatever is
required. It is most desirable that something of this kind should be adopted in
Australia. At least it is quite certain that every suburb should possess its own
local market. This need not attempt to rival the central depot, but take rank as a
local necessity.
FISHMONGERS AND THE SALE OF FISH.
This is naturally in intimate connection with the preceding, and it is very advisable
to refer to it in order to direct attention to one or two matters. In the first place,
I shall commence by saying that both Sydney and Melbourne are lamentably
deficient in fishmongers' shops similar to those which are so common in London.
As a matter of fact, the show of fish exposed for sale is in striking contrast to
that of meat. For in Sydney and suburbs alone the butchers' establishments run
to the number of nearly 600, while in the Melbourne metropolis they even exceed
this. One has only to look through the directories of either Sydney or Melbourne,
under the heading of "Fishmongers," to see how few their numbers are. In our own
city, Chinnery, of Hunter Street, and Matterson, of Pitt Street, make a
highly creditable show, and in the southern capital, Jenkins, of Swanston Street, is
well known for his excellent display. Otherwise the exhibition of fish for sale in
either city is disappointing in the extreme, and is nothing less than an abject
confession of our inability to develop our own natural resources.
There was formerly in Melbourne, however, a most admirable firm known as the
Mutual Provedoring Company, whose premises were centrally situated near the
main suburban railway station. Their show of fish was something to behold, and I
do not remember to have seen it surpassed, even in the old country; and, in
addition, they hit upon a very excellent device - one so good, in fact, that it is well
worthy of imitation. That is to say they gave to every customer a capital fish
cookery book, written, indeed, by our own Mrs. H. Wicken. It was a well-compiled
production, and contained a goodly number of practical and economical recipes,
having special regard to our Australian fish. In this way they did splendid work, as
by means of the Fish Dainties (the title of the book) they popularised the use of
fish. Now, it is greatly to be regretted that this firm no longer exists, because if
ever there was a venture which deserved support, it was surely this. But I am no
pessimist in these matters, and verily believe that before long this company, or
one similar, will be in full swing again, and that the public will thereby benefit in
every conceivable way. As far as Sydney is concerned there is a different state
of affairs, and it is with genuine pleasure that I refer to the New South Wales
Fresh Food and Ice Company, of whose enterprise and praiseworthy efforts I must
express my sincere approbation. It is a good thing for the whole community that
their endeavours have been crowned with such marked success; and I am very
certain that, without any exaggeration whatever, one is justified in saying that
this company have been of unmistakable service to their numerous
customers, and that by their distribution of fish throughout New South Wales,
quite a number of invalids, as well as of healthy people, have every reason to be
grateful. Their exhibition of fish in King Street is at all times most satisfactory.
Moreover, schnapper and other prime fish are often sold there as low as 4d. per
lb., a price at which no one can complain.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE OYSTER.
Attention has been thus far entirely directed to the topic of fish, so that it now
becomes necessary to turn to that of oysters. It will be found, however, that the
actual state of affairs in connection with our oyster fisheries is not at all
inspiriting. But before entering upon this matter it will perhaps lead to a better
understanding of the whole question if some preliminary remarks are made upon
the subject-heading. In doing so it will be most desirable to have recourse to an
account given, not so long ago, by Professor Huxley - at that time Inspector of
Fisheries - since he speaks with the weight of authority. Referring to the oysters
in the old country, he says that during the summer and autumn months, from
about May to September, according to varying circumstances, the oysters pass
into a peculiar condition known to the fishermen under the name of "sick." In this
state the greater number contain a whitish substance, consisting of numberless
granules held together by a sort of slime. The whole is known as "white spat," and
the numberless granules are really the oyster eggs. Slowly and slowly the interior
of the eggs assumes a darkish hue, tinging the whole mass so much that it is then
termed "black spat." Within the space of a fortnight the mass of "black spat"
breaks up, and the young oyster is set free.
Mr. Frank Buckland has been fortunate enough to actually see this taking
place. The oyster appears to await its opportunity, it stealthily opens its shell, and
a lot of spat looking like a dense cloud is ejected. After a minute or two another
cloud appears, and this is continually repeated till the performance is concluded.
Myriads of young oysters thus liberated from parental control now enter upon the
free swimming or locomotive stage of their existence. That is to say they remain
near the surface of the sea, although incessantly moving in every direction.
After a variable time, however, they suddenly descend and attach themselves to
any suitable substance, on which they at once become distinctly visible in the form
of white dots. In their restless stage they are scarcely discernible by the naked
eye, but they settle down so rapidly and in such numbers that they appear to fall
down through the water. This is known to oyster fishermen as a " fall of spat,"
and we shall see that this fall of spat is an important occurrence, but that it
varies greatly in different seasons.
THE FAILURE IN THE NEW SOUTH WALES AND VICTORIAN OYSTER
SUPPLIES.
In both New South Wales and Victoria the condition of affairs in connection with
the oyster fisheries and the oyster yield is extremely discouraging. So much so,
that unless something is done -- and done quickly -- we may have to rely mainly
on outside resources for our supply. Even at the present time this is the case to a
greater extent than most people have any idea of. In support of this statement,
as far as New South Wales is concerned, it is only necessary to turn to the last
Fisheries Report for the year ending 1890. There it is pointed out that in that
year, notwithstanding the enormous length of our oyster-bearing foreshores, we
are brought face to face with the fact that we are indebted to other
colonies -- New Zealand and Queensland -- for two-thirds of our supply. Again, Mr.
Lindsay Thompson, the chief inspector of New South Wales fisheries, in his recent
official work, The Fisheries of New South Wales, makes the following
statements: -- In the year 1871 no less than 93,000 bushels of oysters were
obtained from the New South Wales beds, which, indeed, helped to supply the
Victorian as well as our own needs; in the year 1883 there was a fall to 46,377
bushels; while in 1891 our fisheries yielded only 14,181 bushels. This is a very
significant shrinkage, and shows a remarkable falling off in the winnings. It is still
maintained by some, however, that there has been a succession of bad spatting
years, and that the supply may yet reach to something of its old proportions.
It will be instructive, then, in this connection to refer briefly to the efforts which
legislation has made to remedy matters in New South Wales. Under the old Oyster
Beds Act of 1868 the areas given to lessees were somewhat large, and
consequently what with the prolific natural supply, and a relatively small
population, they appeared to be doing too well. It was urged, therefore, that the
holdings should be more restricted in size, and that in this way a large number of
small occupiers would be afforded a means of living, while at the same time these
smaller areas would receive more attention. By the Fisheries Act of 1881 a new
era dawned upon the oyster fisheries of this colony, and a system of licensing
small holdings was initiated. Under this Act licensed dredging was permitted, but
with such disastrous results that within two years a Fisheries Act Amendment
Act had to be passed. What happened, in short, was that the beds were actually
skinned, so that the total disappearance of the oyster was looming in the
distance. But even the passing of this latter Act was powerless to check the evil,
and by the Oyster Fisheries Act of 1884 (the present Act) there was a
reversal to the old system of long leases and larger holdings. Even at the present
time matters are far from perfect, and in the opinion of the Commissioners of
Fisheries some radical change is necessary if oyster production is to have a place
at all. Now, it is true that the present Act has checked the wholesale
extermination of oysters on the part of licensed dredgers. But, unfortunately, in
its passage through Parliament, some unhappy amendments totally altered the
intention of the Bill. For instance, one clause makes it penal to remove oysters
from a reserve or leased area without authority; but omits the protection of
oysters on adjoining foreshores which may not be under lease at all; and it has
accordingly happened that unprincipled persons have proceeded to rob the
adjacent unleased beds of every single oyster they contained.
But while faulty and inoperative legislation may be responsible in part for the
failure in our oysteries, it is certain that other causes must be at work to bring
about such a disastrous result. And in the different annual reports on the
fisheries of the colony this is attributed to various reasons. Thus at some places,
between the Richmond and Port Macquarie, it has been set down to the presence
of quantities of decomposing sea-weed on the oyster beds; in the Manning to
deposits of mud and sand; and elsewhere again to the ravages of a small worm.
Besides these causes, too, it has been ascribed to the long continued absence of
floods, with a consequent increased salinity of the water - the latter being
considered inimical to oyster life. In the opinion of scientific writers, water
containing 3 per cent. of salt is most suitable for oyster development, water
above that salinity being too strong, and that below it too weak. It has also been
well pointed out by Mr. henry Woodward, in his admirable pamphlet on Oyster
Culture in New South Wales, that most of our deep water beds are situated
in the rivers, a little way from the sea. Under favourable circumstances there is
just that commingling of the fresh water from the river and the salt water from
the sea which produces the oyster to perfection. In times of drought, however,
the salt water drives out the oysters from the deeper beds by reason of its
greater density. On the other hand, the fresh water, being the lighter, floats at
the top and enables the oysters to live in the shallower parts, by maintaining the
required 3 per cent. of salinity. It is evident from this, that the lessees have
acted in direct opposition to this natural law, for they have stripped the oysters
from the shallow water, where they would have done well, and laid them down on
the deep beds, where the increased percentage of salt water has proved too much
for them.
Dr. James C. Cox, of Sydney, the President of the Fisheries Commission, and our
best known authority on conchology, has contributed a very valuable paper upon
"The Australian Oyster, its Cultivation and Destruction," to the recent official
work, The Fisheries of New South Wales, already referred to. A brief summary
of his views will, therefore, be full of interest. First of all, then, he separates
oysters into three classes, namely, drift oysters, mud oysters, and rock oysters.
Now, this classification must be clearly borne in mind, as it will the better enable
the reader to understand what follows. He attributes the want of success in our
oysteries to several causes, which have not been sufficiently heeded. One of
these is that the oyster culturists have expected that the seed oysters which
they obtained from between high and low water mark (rock oysters) would
produce drift oysters if placed on beds on which drift oysters once throve in
abundance. Dr. Cox maintains, however, that these two kinds of oysters, the rock
oysters and the drift oysters, are quite different, and, as it will be seen,
believes that they require different food. It can be well understood from this,
then, that rock oysters will fail to grow on drift-oyster beds.
As to the mud oyster, he thinks very highly of it, and regrets that it has been so
ignored by our oyster culturists. He is quite sure that if our mud oyster were
cultivated and educated as it is now in Europe, it would be brought to the same
perfection as the European and American oyster. It has been said of our mud
oyster that it will not keep, and will not carry; but the same was said of its
European representative until its cultivators came to discover that by a gradual
process of raising it could be educated to keep quite long enough for all
commercial purposes.
To come to the real point on which Dr. Cox considers that all oyster culture has
failed in Australian waters. It is an established fact that the drift oyster and also
the mud oyster require a diatomatic food for their existence. These two varieties
of oysters no doubt consume other forms of food, but living diatoms constitute
by far the greatest part. On the contrary, the rock oyster does not appear to
need the diatomatic nutriment to sny extent, and is fed chiefly by larval forms of
marine life. Thus, knowing that the drift and mud oysters require different food
from the rock oyster, it is easy to see why our oyster culturists have failed in
establishing new beds of oysters in various places. For the whole purport of Dr.
Cox's paper may be summarised into expressing his belief that sufficient
attention has not been devoted to the replenishment of our natural beds, with
their own kind.
In former days, when our drift and mud oysters were in their prime, there were
many pools of naturally preserved fresh water -- in fact, often very extensive
lakes -- on the banks of many of the estuaries and inlets running up into
our rivers and creeks. Now, these reservoirs appear to have been constantly
supplied by subaqueous springs of fresh water, and in consequence the supply of
diatomatic food was abundant. It was abundant, because, as it is well known,
diatomatic life depends for its existence, to a great extent, on the presence of
fresh water. These collections of fresh water no longer exist, so that the
diatomatic food supply is not forthcoming to maintain the drift and the mud
oyster. But there are other additional causes for the disappearance of these
latter. The surrounding ground has been cleared for agricultural purposes, and the
earth, broken up by ploughing, has been washed into these estuaries, and has
suffocated, as it were, the oysters in their natural position. Again, the water
which flows over the oysters is continually being disturbed by the different
steamers passing up and down. The stirred-up mud they create gets into the gills,
and destroys the oysters.
From the preceding it will be seen that Mr. Cox is of opinion that the loss of
diatomatic food is one of the principal causes in diminishing the supply of drift and
mud oysters, and in addition he believes that this decrease has been also brought
about by muddy water. Indeed, fairly clear water is absolutely necessary for their
existence. On the contrary, water loaded with any sediment interferes with the
functions of the oyster so much as to destroy it. In this way floods are
considered to be beneficial, and even almost necessary, to proper oyster
development; for they clear out the accumulations of mud, silt, and marine
vegetable growth, thus giving the beds every chance. And further, Mr. Thomas
Whitelegge, of the Australian Museum, has made some investigations into what is
known as the "worm disease," due to the polydora ciliata. It was commonly
suppose that it was not the worm itself which was fatal, but that by boring
through the shell it afforded entrance for the fine mud, which quickly destroyed
the oyster. From the result of his researches, however, Mr. Whitelegge believes
that the young worm simply swims into the open oyster, and that it immediately
begins to construct a tube and collect a large quantity of mud. The worms appear
to have the power of collecting a large quantity of mud in a very short time. The
mud is covered over at once by the oyster with a thin layer of shelly matter, thus
enveloping the worm, together with its mud. After this, one of two things
happens: if the oyster be healthy, it envelops the worm and mud so quickly as to
dispose of the intruder for good; but, on the other hand, if the oyster be
unhealthy, or already infested, the shelly deposition is far slower, as a
consequence of which the worm gains the ascendency, and the oyster succumbs.
In Victoria, too, the oyster fisheries are in a most unsatisfactory condition.
According to Mr. Saville Kent, the author of The Great Barrier Reef of
Australia and formerly Commissioner of Fisheries in several of the Australian
colonies, and who is qualified to speak on these matters, the destruction of the
oyster there has been brought about by sedimentary deposits, by parasitic
growths, such as sponges, mussels, ascidians, and sea-weed; by the attacks of
the dog-whelk and other natural enemies; and by their continual removal by human
agency. He points out that there are the remains of magnificent natural beds in
different parts, but that they are on the verge of ruin through neglect on the one
hand and the invasion of poachers on the other. In short, he very plainly shows
that unless active measures be taken for their general resuscitation and
development, Victoria will have to look elsewhere for her oyster supply.
THE RE-CREATION OF OUR OYSTER FISHERIES.
If one only looks to the conduct of some of those who have been engaged in our
oyster fisheries, the reason for their present defective state will be readily
apparent. The Fisheries Commissioners well express it when they state that "If a
person takes up ground only for the purpose of collecting and selling whatever
oysters he finds upon it, and bestows no care in providing for the continuity of the
supply, that ground must cease to be productive." And apart from this it will be
found that even when every effort has been made to provide for continuous
supply, yet the matter is by no means easy.
The truth is the oyster fisheries have been managed in a happy-go-lucky way.
There has been but little care taken in their conservation, and the inevitable result
is that the winnings, as the official figures show, are rapidly failing. The same
thing is not peculiar to Australia, however, and has happened everywhere else
where the same careless policy has been pursued. We have, then, a grain of
comfort from the fact that it is not confined to us. In our own case the Fisheries
Commissioners have repeatedly called attention to the need for certain legislative
reform in connection with our oysteries. They assert, in fact, that "it is
absolutely imperative that our oyster beds and deposits must be regulated on
quite a different system to that which obtains under the existing law."
Mr. Saville Kent, who has been investigating the cause of failure in connection with
the oyster fisheries of Victoria, not so long ago, has made some interesting
recommendations. The principle of his system is to establish on selected spots, in
the neighbourhood of the formerly most productive natural oyster grounds, small
Government reserves, whereon stocks of oysters shall be laid down and
carefully cultivated for breeding purposes. He points out that the capacity of
oysters for breeding is greatly augmented when they are collected together in a
small space, in comparison with that of equal numbers thinly scattered over my
extensive area. Each reserve in this way constitutes a prolific breeding centre for
stocking the surrounding waters, and by this means alone the process of
restoring the natural beds is quickly accelerated.
Indeed, he is particularly careful to draw attention to the fact that in the
previously attempted establishment of artificial oyster fisheries a prominent
error was in working too large areas. One or two acres intelligently cultivated can
be made to produce far more substantial results than a very large area under
inefficient management, and at much less expenditure of time and money. A vast
amount of money has been expended in different localities on the Victorian coast
for the purpose of developing the oyster fisheries. In the great majority of cases,
however, the site selected was unsuitable for such a purpose, and the mode of
culture adopted impracticable and inefficient. For instance, one place was the
recipient of a vast amount of sedimentary deposits. Here he found that they had
surrounded the chosen areas with fences of great height and strength, and
closely wattled, for the purpose of catching and retaining the young oyster brood.
Instead of this, however, they had simply acted as "catch-pits," which had
accumulated soft oozy mud to the depth of several feet, and a few dead oyster
shells were the only result.
Instead of such an evident failure as this, he recommends oyster-spat collectors
of two kinds, one consisting of extra thick split palings 4 ft. long by 8 in. wide,
with a brick attached to each end to weigh them down, and at the same time to
raise them off the ground. Several of them on being raised for inspection, after
three months, were found to have over 1,000 embryo oysters adhering to
them. The other form of spat collector he employs consists of cemented slates,
arranged ridge-wise on light ti-tree frames, and in some localities these were
found to be even more efficacious than the palings.
In the old country the same necessity for oyster culture is well recognised. In an
interesting address given not so long ago, Professor Huxley, after referring to the
growing scarcity of the bivalve, expressed his belief that the only hope for the
oyster consumer was first in oyster culture, and secondly in discovering a means
of breeding oysters under such conditions that all the spat was safely deposited.
France has done more than any other country in the world in the artificial culture
of the oyster. Not many years ago the oyster fisheries there were in danger of
absolute extinction -- a state of affairs brought about by reckless and
unrestricted fishing, without any effort to provide for a re-supply. Mainly through
the efforts of M. Coste, the propagation of oysters was scientifically carried out,
with a result that has even exceeded the marvellous. According to a recent
French official report, the Bay of Arcachon contained in the year 1807, 20 private
parcs, or district oyster beds. In the year 1865 these had increased to the
number of 297, with an output of 10,000,000 oysters. In the year 1887, the area
under cultivation in the same bay amounted to 15,000 acres, and produced
300,000,000 oysters. In addition to this, a still later report attributes the
present flourishing condition of this industry "to the steps primarily initiated by
the Government, and to the necessity of upholding this success by continuing the
same system of administrative supervision, together with the practical
illustration in the Government model parcs of the most perfected methods of
oyster culture, for the benefit of private cultivators."
And lastly, if we require further evidence in support of the necessity for
ostreiculture, we have only to turn to America. A falling off in the supply led to an
inquiry into the cause by the United States Fish Commission. Professor Goode, in
his review of the work accomplished by this body, writes, inter alia: -- "The
important distinction between the extermination of a species and the destruction
of a fishery should be noted. In the case of fixed animals like the sponge, the
mussel, and the oyster, the colonies or beds may be practically exterminated,
exactly as a forest may be cut down. The preservation of the oyster beds is a
matter of vital importance to the United States, for oyster fishing unsupported
by oyster culture will, within a short period, destroy the employment of tens of
thousands, and the cheap and favourite food of tens of millions." "Something,"
the professor proceeds to say, "may be effected by laws which allow each oyster
bed to rest for a period of years after each season of fishing upon it. It is the
general belief, however, that shell-fish beds must be cultivated as carefully as
garden beds, and that this can only be done by leasing them to individuals. It is
probable that the present unregulated methods will prevail until the dredging of
the natural beds ceases to be remunerative, and that the oyster industry will then
be transferred from the improvident fisherman to the care-taking
oyster-culturists." We are thus led to the inevitable conclusion that if our
Australian oyster fisheries are to be re-created, it will be necessary to follow in
the same lines. With that object in view, therefore, it will be needful to devise
suitable legislative enactments to protect our oyster fisheries and to foster
ostreiculture at the same time. We must benefit, in short, by the experience
derived from other parts of the world where ostreiculture has been carried to a
state of absolute perfection.
THE FOOD VALUE OF THE OYSTER.
In the first place I shall begin by affirming that it would be a difficult matter
indeed to say too much in favour of the oyster. It is as highly appreciated at the
present day as it was by the Romans hundreds of years ago, and it is certain that
in centuries to come it will be found occupying a similar unrivalled position. At the
same time, it must not be forgotten that it is not every person who cares for the
oyster, showing that there are various forms of affliction; and we find,
accordingly, that there is no half-heartedness about the like or dislike for the
oyster - it is either held in the loftiest admiration, or looked upon almost with
repugnance. It is both food for the sick-room and food for the strong man. It is
one of the most valuable forms of nourishment for the growing child, and it gives
strength to those of declining years. It is specially appropriate for the brain
worker, and yet it is deservedly in great repute with the muscle user - whether
athlete or artisan. It is the opening ceremony at our feasts, while it reigns
supreme at supper. In short, there is everything to be said for it, while not a
single word can be urged against it.
But if it is thus so highly appreciated in health, it is in disease that it is at its
best; for here it occupies a place which nothing else can fill. Indeed, after many
cases of acute or serious illness, the oyster is one of the first things which the
patient looks for. In many chronic disorders, too, it is absolutely without a rival.
Thus, in anaemia, where the blood is so poor, it restores the strength; in
bronchitis and other chest diseases it helps to relieve the loaded tubes of phlegm;
in consumption and similar wasting maladies it conserves the vital powers; in
debility it creates new force; in indigestion it is often digestible when all
else is indigestible; in nervous disease it renews the nervous energy. The list, in
fact, might be multiplied indefinitely, but enough has been instanced to prove the
value of the oyster. It should be added, in conclusion, that it is best eaten raw,
with its juice, which is its blood mixed with sea-water. A squeeze of lemon is
generally employed to bring out its flavour, and, for those who are not invalids, a
sensation of cayenne pepper is distinctly an improvement.
THE FOOD VALUE OF FISH.
Along with its great ally, the oyster, fish undoubtedly occupies one of the highest
places on the food list. Unfortunately, it is not met with in every home as it should
be, its high price and scarcity combining to make it conspicuous by its absence.
That such a state of things is actually the case in Australia can only be deeply
deplored. Let us suppose, for instance, that we were as well supplied with fish as
we are entitled to be, considering that we are of a maritime race and that we live
near the sea. If such were the case -- and I would it were so -- how would a
sudden reversal to the present state of our fish supply be received? Would it not
give rise to protestations, to indignation meetings, to questionings in the House,
and to the papers being filled with complaints, till matters were put right again?
Yes, indeed, all these things would happen! meanwhile, however, we continue
placidly in our fishless state of existence, and the finny tribe, outside in the deep
sea, have a good time in consequence.
It may seem of little use, therefore, to call attention to the value of fish when we
are practically bereft of it. But as some improvement may come about in course
of time, the attempt will not be altogether thrown away. First of all, then, it is
worthy of note that in the old country that advocate for rational feeding,
Sir Henry Thompson, has recently expressed his opinion that a large proportion of
the town population would profit by exchanging some of their meat, as an article
of daily diet, for fish. He further adds that the digestive system is apt to become
overloaded and oppressed by meals consisting chiefly of meat, and that many a
constitution suffers from an over-supply in this way, which cannot be remedied
without a considerable amount of exercise. That being the case in the old country,
with its cold, damp climate, these facts are intensified a thousandfold when they
are applied to our semi-tropical existence. Dr. T. K. Chambers, also, another
authority on all that pertains to diet, is an advocate for a more general use of fish
in our daily life; and, as he sagely observes, every sort is best when it is cheapest,
for it is then most plentiful and in fullest season. Then, again, we have Dr. F.W.
Pavy, who is well qualified to speak on these matters, observing that fish is an
important article of food. For, as he proceeds to point out, the health and vigour
of the inhabitants of the fishing towns, where fish may form the only kind of
animal food consumed, show that it is capable of contributing, in an effective
manner, to the maintenance of the body under active conditions of life. Dr. Horace
Dobell, too, tells us how nearly fish represents in food value as equal weight of
meat, and how important it is to other forms of animal food as a mixed diet.
Indeed, it would be possible to adduce similar statements to an indefinite extent,
but my main object in making these references is to call attention to the value of
fish as ordinary diet. And although it hae an every-day value of this kind, there are
in addition certain qualities ascribed to fish which render it particularly
appropriate for a large and important section of our population.
I refer to the brain workers. I say large and important, because in their ranks are
to be found literary men and journalists, members of the professions,
active-minded, busy men of the commercial world, and the vast array of those
having mental work and clerical occupations. In one of the latest books on the
subject of food and diet by Dr. Burney Yeo, he remarks that it is the custom to
speak of fish as an "intellectual" or "brain" food, on account of the phosphorus
contained in it. But he adds that much of its reputation in this respect may be due
to its being readily digested by persons of sedentary and studious habits. He
proceeds to quote Louis Agassiz, the famous naturalist, who bestows upon fish
the following: -- "Refreshing to the organism, especially for intellectual labour;
not that its use can turn an idiot into a wise or witty man, but a fish diet cannot
be otherwise than favourable to brain development."
But if fish is thus a necessary and desirable element in the dietary of our active
daily life, it is not to be forgotten that it is at least equally valuable for the invalid.
It is often tolerated by the stomach when the digestive powers are weakened
from any cause. When the system is recruiting after any exhausting illness, it is
usually amongst the earliest forms of nourishment allowed. In many chronic
disorders, likewise, it is just one of those things whose place it would be impossible
to fill. And, lastly, it should be ever remembered that many men whose lives are
passed in a state of perfect thraldom by reason of their extravagant use of
butcher's meat would find themselves better in health, better in spirits, and
better in temper, were they to curtail their allowance, substituting fish in its
place.
"A salad is a delicacy which the poorest of us ought always to command."
ALTHOUGH for some years past any information pertaining to salads and
salad-making has been eagerly welcomed by the writer, yet it must be admitted
that great difficulties in obtaining such know-ledge in Australia do exist, because
the use and value of salads are not widespread and understood, and thus it is that
their health-conferring properties are passed by seemingly without regret. And if
the topic, therefore, is one possessing an attractive personal interest, for that
very reason it is felt that the present chapter falls far short of what might be
achieved; yet it may be permissible to plead in extenuation thereof that its
composition has not proved the easiest of tasks, and its shortcomings must
consequently be condoned by an indulgent public. I shall begin, then, by saying that
if ever there was a form of food which was intended for our semi-tropical climate
it is undoubtedly the salad, and as thus constituting an article of diet so well
adapted for Australia it should certainly be seen daily in every household. It is so
appropriately suitable for use amongst us that it deserves to be intituled "the
sea-breeze of the table," for in addition to its invigorating qualities, it cleanses,
while at the same time it enriches, the blood. The late gifted George Dallas did not
go too far when he asserted that a salad was not merely food, but that it had also
an exhilarating effect and a distinct action upon the nervous system, which was
immensely agreeable and acted like a spell.
It seems more suitable, however, instead of abruptly plunging into the
matter of salad concoction, to say a few words from a culinary point of view on
the art of making life enjoyable, and thus to draw attention to the curious neglect
which is shown to a form of food within the reach of all classes, and whose use
would be of the greatest advantage to the health and pleasing to the palate. At
the same time, although an ardent believer in the distinct benefit which would be
derived by the entire community from the adoption of a mode of living more in
harmony with their climatic surroundings, yet I must disclaim any desire to pose
as a "faddist." In truth, there are too many worthy people who would submit all
the world to their theories in a Procrustean fashion, and who see in their
particular hobby a panacea for the whole of human frailties and human sufferings.
Instead, therefore, of dilating on the undeniable consequences attached to the
reasonless use of animal food at present followed throughout Australia, I shall
content myself with a few remarks on the art of living. By far the greater number
of people pay too little attention to the present, and imperil their happiness with
the hope that at some future period, when they will have put a little together,
they will be enabled to thoroughly lay themselves out for enjoyment. But in the
vast majority of cases these halcyon days never arrive, or, if they do, it is more
than probable the health is undermined by the neglect of those very matters
which should form part and parcel of one's daily existence. It is the exact parallel
to a man hurrying through many fields and parks and gardens for the purpose of
enjoying, from some high eminence, the scene through which he has passed. In his
desperate haste to attain his object he disregards all that is beautiful and
interesting, only to find that his travelling is nearly over, and that his steps
cannot be retraced. On the other hand, a far more philosophic frame of
mind belongs to him who, as he proceeds onwards through life's journey, gets a
rational enjoyment out of his existence, so that his days pass pleasantly and his
health receives the consideration it deserves. It will appear somewhat mundane in
this connection to assert that the latter and, therefore, happiness are to a great
extent dependent upon the mode of living, but nevertheless it is absolutely true,
and thus it is that I come back to the quotation at the beginning of this chapter -
"A salad is a delicacy which the poorest of us ought always to command."
You will remember that the Duc de la Rochefoucauld, in those marvellous essays
and maxims of his, says that notwithstanding the disparity of men's fortunes
happiness is equally distributed. He was doubtless right, more especially as he
looked at the matter from a Frenchman's point of view, for it must be
remembered that to the great body of people in that country life is more pleasant
than to the rest of humanity. Indeed, on this point Mr. Sept. Berdmore declares
that in France dishes are cooked by the humblest which would be appreciated if
they appeared on the menu of the best club in London, and he avows, moreover, it
possesses the greatest national school of cookery that has ever existed. But, on
the contrary, as far as Australia is concerned, the state of affairs in the culinary
art with the bulk of the people is simply deplorable, and it seems. well nigh
hopeless for any improvement to be brought about. There is, however, one little
ray of light at the end of this dark tunnel we are in, and it is the knowledge that
the cookery classes in the public schools will by-and-by bring about important
changes, resulting in the amelioration of the whole of the culinary habits at
present, curiously, supposed to exist. And it is gratifying to know that the
admirable cookery classes at the Technical College, under the able guidance of
Mrs. Wicken, are making the most excellent progress and producing brilliant
results.
These altruistic reflections, however, have somewhat drifted us away from
the matter under consideration, so that it becomes necessary to revert again to
the main subject. Now, even at the risk of being regarded as wearisome, I propose
to consider somewhat fully the different steps to be followed in the preparation
of a simple salad, for it will be noticed that in all the cookery books the directions
given for the concoction of a salad are most meagre and wanting in detail. In
addition to this want of information, too, it is quite evident that the instructions
have never been actually followed by the compilers of these works themselves, or
they would signally fail if they attempted to follow their own advice. Furthermore,
even those who pride themselves on the knowledge of the preparation of food for
the table are often surprisingly misinformed on the subject of salad-making. It will
be as well at this stage, consequently, to refer to the plan usually followed by
English people, so as the better to contrast the two methods - the faulty or
English with the correct or French. Well then, English people almost invariably cut
their lettuce first into halves, and next into quarters. These latter are then
placed in water to soak for some time, and are afterwards laid on a plate to drain.
In this way the leaves are supposed to be thoroughly cleansed, but as a matter of
fact deep down between the leaves are the minute insects, which are left
undisturbed. The next proceeding is to cut the leaves into very fine shreds, to add
a few slices of hard-boiled egg, and finally to pour over the whole a mysterious
mixture known as salad-dressing. Thus is produced the orthodox English salad,
which everyone, probably from patriotic motives, pronounces to be extremely
nice. In the French preparation of a salad, however, each single leaf is detached
and carefully cleansed, some needing simply wiping, while others require absolute
washing. Every leaf, be it borne in mind, before going into the salad bowl
must be perfectly dry, or else the first great principle of salad making will be
infringed, for oil and water refuse to mingle. In preparing a French salad, too, the
stalks or coarse ribs are removed from the middle part of each leaf, and the
larger leaves also are carefully divided into halves. The whole leaf is not chopped
up into shreds, as in the English salad. After this the drying of the leaves is best
accomplished by placing them within a clean towel. Instead of the towel a wire
basket, panier a' salade, is more convenient and is generally used in France; it
should be easily obtainable for a shilling or two. In using the towel the four corners
are held together in the right hand, and the whole is repeatedly brought sharply
round with a swing of the arm, stopping with a sudden jerk, till all the water is
driven off 011 the floor. Herein consists the excellence of the French method, for
the leaves are thoroughly cleansed, the acrid parts are removed, and the leaves
are perfectly dry. On a small plate, near by, are usually three or four heaps of
finely-chopped herbs (fines herbes), namely, burnet, chervil, chives, tarragon,
mustard and cress, or even parsley; these constitute what is known as "the
fourniture" of the salad. The lettuce leaves, on being taken out of the towel, are
then placed within the bowl, and over them is daintily spread whatever is required
from each of the little heaps of herbs already referred to. A little salt is next to
be quietly tapped over the salad, and the spoon salad-server is then filled once or
twice with the best salad-oil, and this is now sprinkled on the salad, carefully
turning the leaves over the while so as to obtain the thinnest possible film of oil
equally distributed over the whole surface of each leaf. The salad spoon is next
half-filled with the best vinegar, and the latter liquid is now most carefully added,
only a drop or so at a time, so as to diffuse it uniformly throughout the whole. The
thorough incorporation of the oil, but more particularly of the vinegar, with
the salad requires to be done with a light hand to avoid bruising the leaves, and
consists in stirring it and dexterously bringing up the under leaves.
This comparison, however, between the methods of preparing salads according to
the English and the French fashion is not quite complete, and consequently it will
be advisable to refer to one or two other matters, of which it is necessary to be
apprised in order to produce a perfect salad. In the first place, the form of the
salad bowl itself is very important, for it will readily be apparent that it must be
of such a shape as to facilitate the complete blending of the oil and vinegar with
the materials used. That which is nearest to half a perfect sphere is by far the
best; and another essential is that it should be of sufficient size to afford room
for free manipulation. On looking in the windows orle is fairly astonished at the
diversity of shapes that are exposed for sale. In most of them the floor of the
bowl is flat, with a sort of recess all round its margin. This, of course, is most
ill-adapted for the purpose for which it is intended. Nearly all of them, again, are
by far too small; it is impossible to mix a salad properly in a vessel very little
larger than a soup plate. So that in the selection of a salad bowl see that it is the
nearest approach to half a perfect sphere in shape, and take care that it is roomy
enough for freely working the salad. Lastly, do not waste money on the
meretricious ornamental world which besets so many of the bowls exposed for
sale. A very good substitute can be made in the ordinary large earthenware basin
used in the kitchen, the deeper the better, which will be found to answer every
purpose, and its cost brings it within the reach of every purse. Next, with regard
to the servers, these are usually supplied with the bowl, but wooden servers are
considered by many to be the best, and price is certainly no drawback. The
oil, too, must be the purest you can buy, and Crosse and Blackwell's is as good as
any; at least, I do not know of a better oil at present, as it is sweet and without
the slightest suspicion of rankness. So, too, with regard to vinegar: pay a little
more for a good article, and you will have no cause to regret it. The best French,
or Crosse and Blackwell's white wine vinegar, is good enough for anybody. You will
find that the oil and the vinegar will last a long time, and that the cost of making a
salad is actually the veriest trifle. In making a plain lettuce salad such as has been
described, you will, of course, have to do without the chopped herbs, because,
unfortunately, we in Australia have not risen to the necessity for their cultivation,
but you can make shift with small pieces of celery, which taste admirably in the
salad, or little bits of radish, or thin slices of cucumber - whatever, in fact,
happens to be in season.
There is a remarkable condition of affairs obtaining in Sydney, and the same
applies to the other metropolitan centres of Australia. On turning up our directory
for the current year it will be found on reference that the number of butchers for
the city and suburbs is nearly 600. On the other hand, the number of those whose
calling is given as that of greengrocer does not reach 300. Now, it is not to be
denied that a goodly proportion of vegetables are sold by dealers whose address is
not to be found under the latter heading. Nevertheless, it is still a significant fact
that while many of the butchers' establishments possess quite an attractive and
inviting appearance, on the contrary those devoted to the sale of greengrocery
are represented by dingy-looking places, and by a collection of faded vegetables
which seem always to be apologising for being on view at all. The show of meat
which is to be found in our Australian capitals is certainly worthy city in the
world, and if the display of vegetables were only equal to it, as it assuredly should
be, there would be at least something on which we might congratulate ourselves.
Another fact which is equally to he deplored with this small display of vegetables
seen throughout the city is the few varieties which are cultivated. In a former
chapter attention was drawn to the nutritious properties and exquisite flavour of
many vegetables which are easily grown, but which are most unaccountably passed
over, and it will be remembered that the tomato was instanced in particular as
having a desperate struggle for existence, and that it was years and years before
it was finally received into favour. Similarly in the case of salad plants there is the
same matter for complaint, and beyond the ordinary cabbage lettuce, celery,
cucumbers, and radishes, there is nothing grown. And yet there ought to be
inducement enough for many of our young men to devote themselves to such a
healthy occupation as market gardening, with profit to themselves and with
benefit to the community. The market gardens around Paris, although small, are
cultivated to perfection. The French market gardeners, moreover, are, as a rule,
a very prosperous class; they keep to themselves, and marry among themselves.
On making inquiries from the leading seedsmen throughout Australia, and asking
what varieties of salad plants are mostly in vogue, you find that the cabbage
lettuce is almost the sole representative. And thus it is that in the very climate
where the system calls for salads, so to speak, there is absolutely no attempt
made to supply a crying want. A brief reference to a few of these salad plants will
better illustrate the importance of their culture. Here, as with the different
vegetables, I applied to headquarters for information, namely, to Mr. F. Turnen, of
the Department of Agriculture, Sydney, who once more came to my assistance
and courteously indicated the localities in which they are likely to do well.
And it only seems fitting and appropriate here to remark that Australia's road to
prosperity lies through her agriculture; the hydro-cephalic growth visible in every
colony is unnatural and needs rectification.
Lettuce. --- Of this there are two varieties, the ordinary cabbage lettuce and
the cos, so named from the Island of Cos in the Aegean Sea, which is also known
as the upright, or smooth-leaved lettuce. Although this latter is to be obtained,
yet in nine cases out of ten only the cabbage lettuce is procurable. But, as a
matter of fact, the upright or smooth-leaved cos lettuce is of a more delicate
flavour, and when grown properly by having the leaves loosely tied together at the
top about ten days before cutting, it is more crisp and juicy, and better adapted
for saladings. In the old country, too, the cos variety, with its long leaves, is
common enough, and is there preferred to the cabbage lettuce. It is to be
regretted, therefore, that we see so little of it.
Endive. -- Now, here is a noble salad plant of which even the very name is hardly
known by the greater number of our people. There are practically two classes of
endive, the broad-leaved or Batavian variety, and the curly-leaved endive. Both
sorts, however, must be well blanched if perfection is required. It is true that the
curly-leaved endive is at times to be obtained here, but it is extensively cultivated
in England, as it is very crisp and tender, while it also possesses a piquancy which
is greatly appreciated. Nevertheless, the plain or Batavian kind (the escarole of
the French) has also its admirers, particularly for salad purposes. Now, it is to be
carefully noted that the accompaniments, or "fourniture," of these two varieties
of endive are vastly different. With the Batavian it usually is formed of chervil,
tarragon, and that delicate alliaceous salad herb, chives. On the other hand, a
chapon is used with the curly endive; it consists of a crust of bread over
which a clove of garlic has been rubbed. This is thrown into the bowl and tossed
about during the process of mixing the salad, and gives to it a delightful effect. In
addition to its use as a salad, the curly-leaved endive makes a particularly good
garnish for grills, such as chops, steaks, &c.; and, by the way, Sir Henry
Thompson, the eminent surgeon, remarks that the sauce par excellence for grills
is mushroom ketchup. But before leaving the endive it is as well to refer to a blood
relation, namely, the wild endive or chicory. When its large, fleshy roots are dried
in a kiln, roasted and ground, they become familiarly known by their admixture
with coffee. This plant, the succory of former days, is greatly esteemed by the
French, by whom it is known as barbe de capucin. To meet the great demand for it
large quantities are sold in the neighbourhood of Paris in order to produce this
salading. Its young leaves are used for this purpose, but they must be thoroughly
blanched so as to take away every particle of bitterness.
Corn Salad. -- This hardy annual salad plant is believed to derive its name from
the fact that it grows spontaneously in the grain-fields. It is also known as lamb's
lettuce, and in America as fetticus. Here is an example of a once well-known plant
dropping out of use, for one of the earliest-known salads was this same corn
salad, on which was laid a red herring. But now-a-days it is called m‰che in Covent
Garden Market, where it has been sent over from France. This lamb's lettuce is
greatly appreciated on the Continent, and makes one of the best of salads,
especially when mixed with celery. As it can be easily grown in all the coastal
districts and in the cooler parts of Australia, it is certainly a matter for regret
that we are not favoured with it.
In addition to the preceding, namely, the cos lettuce, the two varieties of endive,
the chicory, and the corn salad, or lamb's lettuce, there are one or two
other salad plants which require a brief notice. Now, as far as celery and radishes
are concerned, we may be said to be fairly well off; but the same is not the case
with mustard, with garden cress, or even with watercress. The latter is to be
obtained from John Chinaman, it is true; but it is curious that in Australia we see
none of the watercress vendors so familiar in the streets of the old country.. Yet
there is really a good living to be made out of it, and its use would prove of benefit
to hundreds of families, as with a little salt it makes an exquisite sandwich
between two thin pieces of bread-and-butter. A wise physician, Dr. T.K. Chambers,
uttered a great truth when he remarked that the pale faces and bad teeth which
characterised many of the inhabitants of cities were due to their inability to
obtain a proper supply of fresh green vegetables, and that thus the
watercress-seller was one of the saviours of her country. So great is the demand
for watercress in New York when it first comes in that the prices range from 2s.
to 4s. for a basket holding only three quarts. At this rate an acre of watercress
under cultivation would represent almost a fortune. Of course all watercress
should be thoroughly washed and then dried in a towel, like the lettuce for the
salad, before it is eaten. Lastly, it must never be used from a source where any
sewage contamination is suspected.
Now, although these different forms of salad plants are not cultivated to any
considerable extent, yet when we come to inquire into the salad herbs, we find
that they are not grown at all, and indeed they are practically unknown. They
constitute, however, the crowning grace of a proper salad, and confer upon it a
delicacy which is unrivalled, and thus it is that any traveller will tell you that a
salad in France tastes so infinitely better than one elsewhere. Now, these salad
herbs are readily grown, and do not require any care in their cultivation, so
that there is no opportunity for excuse on that score. In order, however, to
prevent this paper becoming too diffuse, I must confine my remarks to those
salad herbs which it is almost impossible to do without - that is, if we wish to have
any salads worth speaking of. It will be convenient, for this purpose, to refer to
the word "ravigote"; and by this term is meant a collection of four herbs, namely
-- burnet, chervil, chives, and tarragon. As has been already mentioned, each of
these herbs, chopped up very finely, is usually placed in a little heap by itself on
the one plate, and from these four heaps is selected whatever is required for the
salad. This invariably forms the garniture of any lettuce salad, whether cabbage
or cos, and also of the Batavian endive, though, as we have already seen, the curly
endive is best suited with the chapon -- i.e., the crust of bread rubbed over with a
garlic clove. The very derivation of the word "ravigote," from the French verb
ravigoter, to cheer or strengthen, shows that certain exhilarating virtues are
ascribed to these herbs.
Burnet. -- This is also known as salad burnet, and is a hardy herb, which will
continue green during the greater part of the year. The young and tender leaves
possess a smell and taste almost identical with cucumber, and greatly enhance
the flavour of the salad. These leaves, when blanched, are sprinkled over the
latter; but in addition burnet enters into the composition of ravigote butter, and
helps to form green mayonnaise. It hardly requires any culture whatever, and will
do well in the coastal districts and in all the cooler localities. With all these
advantages, therefore, we can only marvel why it is denied us.
Chervil. -- Of the two varieties which are cultivated elsewhere than in Australia
-- namely, the common chervil and the curled variety -- the latter is generally
considered the better. It grows about twenty inches high, and has deeply
divided leaves, which are aromatic, and which are thus absolutely a necessary
component of any well-ordered salad. The plant will grow everywhere, and, as it is
never seen, it is only one instance out of the many which might be adduced, that
much is neglected in Australian cultivation which would be of advantage to the
whole community.
Chives. -- This is the most delicate of all the onion family; it occupies the one
end of the scale, while garlic presides at the other; and midway between these we
find the spring onion, the shallot, and the onion itself. It is a delightful salad herb
which is too much neglected, and it is worthily entitled to cultivation in Australia.
It gives to the salad a piquancy and an agreeable pungent flavour, which, while it
faintly recalls that of the onion, is yet free from the accentuated properties of
the latter. In addition to lending such an enhancement to salads, chives may be
used for soups. The plant itself is a hardy bulb, growing to a height of about eight
inches, and it is the tender tops which are used for saladings. It can be easily
propagated, and will grow readily in all the cooler districts.
Tarragon. -- This used popularly to be known in the old country as "herb
dragon," whereas it is now vested with the newer title. It is frequently to be found
there is the country gardens, where it is in repute for the preparation of tarragon
vinegar. It, however, occupies a position second to none as a salad accessory. It is
one of the most odoriferous of the pot herbs, and gives to a salad a delightful
aromatic warmth. At present all that one can do in the concoction of a salad is to
make use of the tarragon vinegar, which is so admirably put up by Messrs. Crosse
and Blackwell. Those who are fortunate enough to possess the plant itself should
keep the leaves, as when dried they retain their flavour for some time. It is
recommended, however, that the young plants should be propagated each year by
division of the roots, as the plants of the first and second years are more
delicate than those of older growth. It can easily be grown over the greater part
of Australia, but I am not going to say more than that we are needlessly bereft of
what we might enjoy.
In drawing attention to any matter connected with the subject of this chapter, a
brief reference to mayonnaise sauce must necessarily find a place. This may be
used with all endless variety of salads, but it is particularly concerned in the
preparation of chicken, and also of crayfish salad. On looking through the
cookery-books one gets perfectly bewildered with the different directions laid
down by the various authors. This mayonnaise sauce, however, is so very
important that it becomes an absolute necessity to know the successive steps in
its preparation, for, though easily made, yet there is a right and a wrong way of
going about it. Through the kindly offices of that accomplished aristologist, Dr. A.
Burne, I was enabled to have some practical instruction in making mayonnaise
sauce at the hands of the chef of the Cosmopolitan Club, and I will endeavour,
therefore, to give an account of how he went to work.
The bowl he employed to mix it was about 9 in. across at the top, and its floor was
rounded in shape, just as a salad bowl should be, to facilitate the thorough
incorporation of the ingredients. Then, taking a couple of eggs, he broke each one
by knocking its side midway between the two ends against the rim of the bowl. The
greater part of the white of the egg was allowed to escape into a small vessel
next the bowl, as it is not required for the mayonnaise, but comes in handy for
other culinary purposes. He now, with the yolk in one half of the shell, poured away
all the white remaining in the other half. Next he dexterously turned the yolk into
this latter emptied shell and then got rid of the white left in the half previously
occupied by the yolk. One egg was thus served in this way, and then the
other, and the two yolks were slipped into the bowl and broken up with a few stirs
of the egg-whisk. This latter is readily purchased from any ironmonger for the
modest sum of one shilling. The next proceeding was a wrinkle which is worth
knowing, and it consisted of placing, within the bowl about a salt-spoonful of the
ordinary dry mustard. This was well beaten up in a second or two. About a
tablespoonful of good vinegar was next added, the whisk going vigorously to work,
and thus blending well together egg yolk, dry mustard, and vinegar. At this stage
occurred a sort of halt or breathing time in the manipulation, as the chief
peculiarity of the mayonnaise now began. The chef, with his left hand, managed to
tilt up the salad bowl and to hold a bottle of salad oil at the same time. The latter
being inverted, he kept it over the contents of the bowl in such a way as to allow
only a drop or so of the oil to escape at a time. Drip, drip, drip, went the oil, and as
his right hand kept unceasingly plying the mixture with the whisk I could not help
noticing what a fine wristy action he had. Almost directly as the oil touched it the
mayonnaise began to thicken, to swell, and to change in colour. The remorseless
whisk almost seemed to lash it into foam, and now the oil came faster and faster
till the amber-looking sauce was ready, and all this within the space of at most
two or three minutes. I suppose he must have used quite a teacupful of olive oil.
Only one thing more: after stirring in a sufficient quantity of pepper and salt, the
chef desired me to taste the result, and as I did so I read the triumph in his eye
-- it was superb.
It has been my aim, indeed my only aim, all through this chapter, to bring into
prominence the important fact that the salad is a dish which is at once within the
reach of every family, and moreover that it is one which is fairly a necessity in
our semi-tropical climate. For these very reasons, consequently, I have
endeavoured to give the fullest directions for the mixing of a simple salad. But it
may be that after becoming thoroughly expert at making this latter, and being
flushed with success, the aspirant for saladic honours will be desirous of a more
ambitious essay. Some instructions for the famous herring salad have therefore
been added, and it can be reserved for high days and holidays, or as a lordly dish
wherewith to entertain a much-esteemed guest. It is slightly altered from a
valuable recipe given to me by my very good friend Mr. Ludwig Bruck, and is made
as follows: -- Two salt Dutch herrings are to be obtained. These are imported in
casks, and when purchased have a somewhat pronounced odour, which is removed
by the soaking. If milt herrings are used, the milt should be moistened with a little
vinegar and rubbed up into a paste, and this should be kept to pour over the salad
just before the dressing is added. If roe herrings are bought, the roe should be
soaked in vinegar for a few minutes, the eggs then separated and kept for
sprinkling over the salad similarly to the preceding. The herring heads and tails are
to be removed and discarded; the bodies should be gutted, skinned, and washed,
and then they must be soaked in water or milk for three hours -- the latter
enhancing the flavour greatly. After the soaking the bones should be removed and
the flesh cut into small dice-like cubical pieces, and the latter are then set aside in
a basin. The next thing is to peel and core two sourish apples, and then to cut
them up into small cubes like the herrings. To the apples should DOW be added two
pickled gherkins, and, if you like, some boiled beetroot and a few capers, and these
- excepting, of course, the capers - should be divided into the same small pieces.
If you wish to have the real herring salad, a quarter of a pound of cold roast veal,
also in small pieces, will likewise be required. Whatever you may choose to
use of these is now to be well mixed together while the next direction is attended
to. It is only fair to note here that Mr. Lang, formerly of the German Club, who
prepares the best herring salads in Sydney, always adds a little cold roast beef,
cold ham, and boiled ox tongue. While all this is being prepared two potatoes should
be boiled with their jackets on. They should then be immediately peeled and cut up
into small pieces like the other ingredients. While now hot the potato is added to
the preceding, and everything is thoroughly mixed together; it is necessary to use
the potato warm, for if cold it would set hard. The methods of using the milt or
the roe of the herring have already been respectively indicated, and after this
matter has been attended to, all that is now needful to complete the herring salad
is to pour over it some mayonnaise sauce, the preparation of which has been
previously described.
"With time and care Australia ought to be the vineyard of the world." - Greater Britain.
WERE I asked to name the one industry on which the prosperity of Australia must
sooner or later rest, I should unhesitatingly answer, "On the cultivation of the
vine." And this must be so; for while there is every reason to know that it will be
called for from abroad, it is absolutely certain that it will be required in our own
territories. The chief purpose of this chapter, indeed, is to insist upon the value
of our own wines as the most healthful and the most wholesome drink for
Australian use. It is a strange anomaly this, that at the present period of our
existence a declaration of this kind should be necessary. Yet it is only in keeping
with the rest of our food habits, with their perpetual challenge to our
semi-tropical environment; and hence we are confronted with the astounding fact
that although we are practically Southern Europe, yet we follow a mode of living
suitable only for a rigorous climate and a land of ice and snow.
Moreover, as I shall attempt to show, the Australian climate and soil are beyond all
question naturally intended for the cultivation of the grape, so that there is no
occasion to overcome the forces of nature; on the contrary, they are unceasingly
giving us the greatest encouragement. Then, again, think what widespread
prosperity the use of our own wine would bring about. Apart from its beneficial
influence on the national health, it would cover the land with smiling vineyards, and
give to enormous numbers a healthy livelihood; it would absorb thousands
from the fever and fret of city wear and tear into the more natural life of the
country; and lastly, it would relieve the abnormal congestion of our crowded
centres, and do more to bring about widely distributed employment than any other
industry.
The history of the introduction of the grape to Australian soil deserves more than
bare reference to that event It will be remembered that Captain Cook discovered
this territory in 1770; in November 1791, barely more than twenty years
afterwards, the first vine was planted at Parramatta, near Sydney. Nothing can
demonstrate the suitability of the climate and the soil for its cultivation more
than this one fact, namely, that at the very beginning of Australian settlement it
was plain enough that the land was meant for the grape; and there is an
interesting historical association, well worthy of note, attached to this
circumstance. By order of the Emperor Napoleon, the Great Napoleon, a voyage of
discovery to the Southern Hemisphere was performed by a fully equipped
expedition during the years 1801, 1802, 1803, and 1804. One of the naturalists,
M.F. Peron, has given us an excellent account of his New South Wales experience,
and after referring to the Parramatta vineyards as likely to be followed by the
most excellent results, he goes on to say: -- "By one of those chances which are
inconceivable, Great Britain is the only one of the great maritime powers which
does not cultivate the vine either in her own territories or her colonies,
notwithstanding the consumption of wine on board her fleets and throughout her
vast regions is immense." This is another illustration of the old adage that
lookers-on see most of the game, for this observant Frenchman has recorded an
opinion the very truth of which comes well home to us. His remarks, moreover,
open up a vista of what a great trade might be done with India in
connection with our wines; indeed, it is this interchange of products which keeps
the circulation going in the blood-vessels of commercial life. Yet, although the vine
was thus early started in Australia, it has since made but little progress,
relatively speaking, in comparison with the great industry of wool-growing, and it
will be appropriate to make this reference to the grape and the fleece conjointly,
for the same name -- that of John Macarthur -- is intimately associated with
both. In a small way sheep-breeding had been initiated soon after the settlement
of Australia. But it was John Macarthur, by his introduction of the merino sheep in
1797, who gave the first impetus which led to the subsequent creation of the
Australian wool trade. It was John Macarthur, too, who formed the first vineyard
in Australia at Camden Park in 1815; though, as I have already said, the growth of
the vine industry has not advanced with anything like the same rapidity as that of
wool; if it had, Australia would now occupy a position second to none in the world.
It seems most fitting and opportune also to mention the fact that at the very
time I am writing there is a proposal in the Sydney Morning Herald to do
something to perpetuate our gratitude to John Macarthur. It is not often that one
man has the opportunity of establishing two such great industries as wine-making
and wool-growing. The benefits to Australia which have followed from the latter
are altogether beyond calculation; for which alone the name of John Macarthur
deserves to hold a place in the memory of Australians for ever, and if the wine
industry had only been developed in like proportion, Australia's prosperity would
have marvellously increased. Knowing, therefore, what John Macarthur has done
for Australia, it is to be hoped that before these lines see the light of day
what is now proposed will be an accomplished fact.
The next most notable occurrence in the history of Australian viticulture is
undoubtedly the action of James Busby who in 1828, says Mr. T.A. Coghlan in his
Wealth and Progress of New South Wales, returned from Europe "with a large
collection of cuttings from the most celebrated vineyards of France, Spain, the
Rhine valley, and other parts of the continent of Europe, and started, on his
estate at Kirkton, in the Hunter River district, a vineyard which has been the
nursery of the principal vineyards of the Colony." This was a more important
event than would be imagined from a bare recital of the fact, for Busby has
conferred upon Australian vines a high quality for all time to come in this way. His
collection of cuttings from the best of the vineyards in Europe consisted of the
choicest varieties or "cepages," and this has been a matter for congratulation
ever since. Fuller reference, however, will be made to this important subject a
little farther on. what is certainly interesting also is that Busby was so impressed
with the future of the Australian wine industry that in 1830 he published his
Manual of Plain Directions for Planting and Cultivating Vineyards, and for
Making Wine, in New South Wales; and, as I have just said, the high qualities of
our wines are due to him alone, so that the name of James Busby must always be
gratefully remembered by all Australians.
It makes one think that these sturdy pioneers of former times had a greater
belief in Australia and her possibilities, and more energy and foresight, than are
apparently possessed nowadays. But while I am on the subject of the literature of
Australian viticulture I must not forget to mention an excellent little pamphlet by
James King in 1807, entitled, Australia may be an extensive Wine-growing
Country. Indeed, James King was another of those far-seeing men who
were convinced that there was a great future for the Australian wine industry;
moreover, he did a good deal in the way of developing it by cultivating the grape
and by making wine.
Now, there are certain figures connected with vine-growing and the consumption
of wine which possess a great value in relation to Australian viticulture, inasmuch
as they enable us to see more clearly its relative progress, and, what is more,
they indicate its future possibilities. It is only by methods of this kind that we are
enabled to form an accurate estimate of the condition of any industry. And
besides this, too, they act as a -- stimulus to increased exertion. But it will be
still more interesting and instructive to make a comparison between the little
which has been done in wine production and the almost incredible proportions of
our wool industry. And when it is remembered that there was nothing to prevent
the wine trade from attaining a magnitude very like to that of wool, it will be seen
what magnificent opportunities have thus far been practically thrown away.
At present the whole of Australia annually produces only a little more than three
million gallons of wine, while the yearly yield of France is 795; of Italy, 798; of
Spain, 608; of Hungary, 180; and of Portugal, 132 million gallons. And another
thing is that the whole of the five colonies of Australia and Tasmania have
altogether no more than 48,099 acres under vine cultivation. The total amount of
wine made in the six foregoing colonies for the year ending March 31st, 1892, was
only 3,604,262 gallons. The city of Paris itself requires nearly 300,000 gallons of
wine daily, so that this single city would consume in 12 days all the wine which the
whole of Australia takes 12 months to make. So far back as 1875 the production
was 1,814,400,602 gallons. And lastly, there is just one more fact worth
remembering which is that the approximate value of the 1890 vintage to France
was nearly 40,000,000 l. sterling.
Let us see, on the other hand, the gigantic strides on the part of wool. In 1805
the amount of wool exported from Spain was 6,895,525 lbs., and from Australia
nil. In 1811, however, Australia exported the modest quantity of 167 lbs. In
1861 the exportation from Spain had fallen to 1,268,617 lbs., while from
Australia it had increased to 68,428,000 lbs. In 1891 New South Wales alone
produced 357,096,954 lbs., representing a value of 11,036,018 l. And lastly, the
wool exportation of Australia and Tasmania (not reckoning New Zealand) for the
same year reached the enormous figures of 593,830,153 lbs., with a value of
20,569,093 l.
The disproportion between the attention which has been given to viticulture and
that which has been bestowed upon wool-growing is well brought out in the
following table: -
TABLE showing the value of the total amount of WINE produced in the FIVE
COLONIES OF AUSTRALIA (including both that for local use and that for export) for
the year ending March 31st, 1892; and the value of WOOL (only that exported, and
therefore irrespective of that locally required) for the FIVE AUSTRALIAN
COLONIES and TASMANIA alone, and not including that exported from NEW
ZEALAND, for the year 1891: --
..
£
Total value of Australian wine (local use as well as export)
produced for the year ending March 31st, 1892, only about...
800,000
Value of wool exported from Australia and Tasmania alone in
1891 (and therefore irrespective of the additional value of that
locally required), not less........
20,569,093
From the foregoing, therefore, it will be apparent that the whole subject of
Australian viticulture is one of tremendous importance; and I am strongly of
opinion that practical results will only be brought about by awakening in the mind
of the Australian public an active interest in everything connected with this,
though yet undeveloped, great wine industry. With that object in view, therefore,
it will be my endeavour to bring forward those main points of viticulture which it is
most desirable should be widely known. But such an attempt, to be successful,
must largely depend upon the arrangement which is adopted, for it is impossible to
do more than take up the principal matters concerned with the space which is at
my disposal. The scheme which has been devised will, it is hoped, help to a clear
understanding of the subject.
THE CLIMATE.
If there is one reason more than any other why the wine industry should sorely
reach to colossal dimensions, it is that the climate is naturally adapted for the
cultivation of the vine. Although human effort and human skill can overcome what
looked to be almost insuperable difficulties, they cannot, as we know, fight against
climate. Hence, having a climate created, as it were, for the growth of the grape,
there can be no possible excuse offered for its neglect. Indeed, as I have already
shown, the suitableness of the climate for this purpose directly attracted the
attention of the first arrivals, and as a consequence the vine was actually planted
a few years after the discovery of Australia.
There are three constituents, namely, heat, light, and moisture, which in varying
proportions make up what is known as climate. The first two, heat and light, are
derived from the same source -- the sun -- and may, therefore, be conveniently
considered together. The more heat and light a vine receives the more vigorously
it grows. What is more important, however, is that the wine from it
becomes stronger. It gains in strength because the percentage of glucose
increases in the must: the must being the juice pressed from the grape, but in
which fermentation has not commenced. Accordingly we find that the wines of the
warmer regions in new South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia are much
stronger than those from the cooler parts.
It is important to remember that the unripe berries of the grape contain several
acids, notably tartaric, citric, and malic acids. As the fruit begins to ripen, these
acids act upon the various substances, namely, starch, gum, dextrine, lignine,
cellulose, &c., also contained within it, and grape sugar or glucose is formed in
consequence with the advent of ripening, therefore, the fruit becomes richer in
sugar and poorer in acids; part of the acids, in addition, is neutralised by the
mineral salts which are absorbed by the roots. These acids, however, are not so
thoroughly neutralised in a cooler climate, and as a result the wine has often a
sour, crude taste. The warmer the climate the more alcohol the wine will contain;
indeed, it may become too strong. On the contrary, the cooler the climate the
more of acid there will be, and it may possess in consequence a crude, sharp
taste. But these are matters which can be rectified by choosing the right
varieties of grape for the different localities, and by their proper cultivation.
The third element concerned in the climate, namely, moisture, has now to be
considered, and it is important from the fact that in a moister climate the
percentages both of glucose and of acids in the grape are diminished. It is also
important for another reason, namely, that while heat and light are unalterable,
moisture may be produced by irrigation. This constitutes one of the vexed
questions connected with viticulture, and the most diverse opinions have
been expressed about it. Some believe that irrigation is of great value, while
others cannot say enough against it. But it would seem that when judiciously
employed it is of unquestionable advantage. It renders the cultivation of the grape
possible in places where it would otherwise be impossible; it largely increases the
yield; and, what certainly must not be forgotten, it enables a lighter wine to be
produced in the warmer regions. And another argument in favour of irrigation is
this, that there is far more fertilizing matter in river water than in rain water.
Hence it is that irrigation greatly enriches the land and increases the yield. It is
thus a powerful aid, and because its advantages have been abused, that is no
reason why it should not be made use of in a rational and scientific manner.
There is still another matter connected with this question of climate, namely, the
aspect of the vineyard, which should be referred to because many different views
are held upon it. But, as in all similar cases where there are such decidedly
antagonistic opinions, it will be found that the arguments are not maintained from
the same standpoint. So in this case the importance or non-importance of the
aspect depends altogether upon the climate, and upon the locality -- whether it be
level or hilly. On level ground the aspect is not nearly so important. On hilly land it
makes a considerable difference, from this circumstance, that in Australia the
northern side of a hill is always hotter than that facing the south. In the hot
regions, therefore, a hill slope facing towards the south is preferable; while in the
cooler districts, since more warmth is required, a situation with a northern aspect
is necessary. It is often said that hilly ground is better for the cultivation of the
vine than level land. This is certainly true as far as cold localities are concerned,
because a warmer aspect can then be chosen, and there will also be more shelter
and better drainage.
THE SOIL.
People as a rule run away with the idea that the soil for the grape must
necessarily be of a rich character. Even the farmer, thinking of wheat growing,
and the market-gardener, thinking of his turnips, are apt to entertain a similar
belief. But the truth is that the vine is a hardy plant and will grow in almost any
place that is not water-logged or otherwise unsuitable. In America the definition of
a soil adapted for the grape is expressed in the following phrase: -- "Land that is
suitable for vine-glowing is land that is not suitable for anything else." This is of
course an extravagant way of stating the matter, still it is worth recalling. We
may say this much, however, that almost any soil will do for the vine, provided
that it does not bake and crack in the summer, nor get wet and boggy in the
winter. A simple test is said to be adopted by the vine-growers of the Rhine. A
specimen of the soil is put into an earthenware vessel into which boiling water is
poured to cover it, after which it is undisturbed for three days. If the water on
being tasted gives a mouldy or salty taste, the soil is believed to be unsuitable.
In considering the soil we must pay heed to its physical and its chemical
characters. By its physical characters we mean its looseness or stiffness, its
depth, and its colour. This looseness is a matter of much importance. It fulfils the
great indication required in a soil for grape-growing; that is, a soil which will not
remain damp after having been well wet. There is a marked difference between a
stiff clayey soil which dries up and cracks in summer, and a loose soil which is
always moist a little below the surface.
The depth of the soil is a matter that varies in accordance with the climate. In
warm districts the vine requires more room for development, and goes deeper. In
the cooler regions it has a sufficiency of moisture, and can content itself
with a shallower soil. The colour of the soil, like its depth, is a matter of
consequence according to the climate. A dark soil absorbs heat, becoming hotter
consequently, while it reflects but little on the plant above. On the other hand, a
light-coloured soil absorbs very little heat, but reflects almost the whole of the
rays upwards upon the vine. From this it follows that a dark soil is better in a
cooler climate, because there is generally an excess of moisture; while a light
colour is more suitable in the warm regions, for the moisture is then retained.
The chemical constituents of the soil play no inconsiderable part in assisting the
development of the vine. Of these, however, there are only five -- namely,
nitrogen, phosphorus, potash, calcium, and iron -- to which it is necessary to draw
attention. For the successful cultivation of wheat and other cereals a richly
nitrogenous soil is invaluable; for turnips and maize one rich in phosphorus is of
great advantage; but for the vine potash is of considerable importance. It is true
that nitrogen and phosphorus are necessary for the production of the vine wood,
but it is for the fruit itself that the potash is so much required. As it is well
known, the deposit known as winestone or "cream of tartar," on the inside of the
cask by the fermentation of wine, is really tartrate of potash. In a similar way the
potato is a plant which requires a supply of potash, and without it there is a
manifest diminution in the crop. But in the case of the vine, unless there is a
sufficiency of potash, the leaves do not attain to their full development; the stem
is stunted to one-fourth of its natural size; and there is little or no fruit at all.
Calcium or lime has a marked effect in increasing the strength of the wine. For
this reason, therefore, this element is more necessary in the cooler than in the
warm regions. And finally, there is that other chemical constituent of the
soil, which deserves a brief notice, and it is iron. Now, the presence of iron therein
has a distinct effect in deepening the colour of a wine. This is without doubt the
reason why our Australian wines, as a general rule, are so rich in colour.
"CEPAGE," OR VARIETY.
Many words connected with viticulture are of French origin, as might be expected
considering that it is a land where the wine industry is such a source of wealth.
The term "cepage" (pronounced say-pazh) is one of these, and it possesses quite
a distinctive and particular significance, so that a little explanation is necessary.
The vine family is divided into several species, of which the ordinary grape vine,
Vitis Vinifera, is the most important. Of the Vitis Vinifera there are many,
more or less distinct, sorts of "cepages"; and the value of the word lies in the
fact that it serves as a means of distinguishing all these different varieties.
Originally a native of Asia Minor, there are now over a thousand sorts of European
vines. Of these quite a number are already cultivated in Australia, and a brief
reference to a few will help to a better understanding of the term "cepage."
Of the red grapes the following may be instanced: -- The Carbenet (pronounced
Car'-ben-ay); of which-there are two varieties, the gros or large, and the sauvignon
or smaller kind. The latter is perhaps the choicest of all the red wine grapes, and has a
characteristic flavour, with delicious bouquet and perfume. It forms the basis of all
the best vineyards of Bordeaux, and is largely cultivated in Australia, for it does well
in the cooler parts. And it will be just as well to take this opportunity of referring to
the word "Carbenet," as in Australia it is much too often erroneously spelt
"Cabernet." The best authorities, however, are all in favour of "Carbenet" as the
proper mode of spelling. In the same way an unfortunate orthography in the case of
Riesling, which was given as "Reisling" in the London exhibition of 1886,
gave a writer in the Saturday Review the opportunity of a tirade against Australian
wine-makers.
The Pinot (pronounced Peen'-o) Noir or Noirier will serve excellently to demonstrate
the significance of the word " cepage." This is the dominating grape of the best
vineyards of Burgundy, and enters into the composition of many famous wines, such as
Romanee-Conti Chambertin, Corton, &c.; just as the Carbenet Sauvignon belongs to
the renowned clarets of Bordeaux, Chateau Margaux, Chateau Lafitte, and Chateau
Latour. This black Burgundy does well in our cooler regions, and is usually pruned
short, although it gives far better results with long pruning.
Shiraz (pronounced Shir-az') is another red variety which is extensively cultivated
in Australia. It is the grape from which the celebrated Hermitage red wine of France is
made, and was first planted by a monk, who brought the cuttings from Shiraz, in
Persia. It is one of our most reliable red varieties, and prospers best in a moderate
temperature. But the white varieties will perhaps afford us a better idea of the
expression "cepage," for three different varieties may be adduced, whose
characteristics are well known. First of all there is Riesling (pronounced Rees'-ling,
but too often, as I have just mentioned, erroneously spelt Reisling), whose prototype
is that delicate Riesling of the Rhine, from which those famous wines of the Rheingau,
namely Steinberg, Marcobrunner, Johannisberg, as well as Hock, are made. It is
probably the best of our white wines, and does well in the cooler districts. But it
should be borne in mind that long pruning is indispensable for it, as it gives very poor
crops when pruned short.
Then we have Tokay (pronounced Tok'-ay), so nearly corresponding to the Furmint,
which is the chief grape grown in the well-known Tokay vineyards of Hungary. It
yields a most excellent wine, and does well in the same regions as the preceding. And
lastly, Verdeilho (pronounced Ver-dell'-o) deserves to be referred to amongst the
white wines. It is the principal white variety grown in Madeira, and Madeira is a wine
that is especially held in repute. It is better suited for the warm districts, and
requires to be completely ripe before vintage.
It was a most fortunate thing for Australia, therefore, that her pioneers in
viticulture were men like James Busby, who obtained their plants from the
finest "cepages" in Europe. And this is a magnificent legacy which must inevitably
exercise a powerful influence for ever on the Australian vine. Mr. Hubert de
Castella drew special attention to this very fact in his paper read before the Royal
Colonial Institute, London, in 1888: so that a beginning was made under the most
auspicious conditions.
There are some interesting facts in connection with the different "cepages"
which are certainly worth noticing. If the climate and the soil in one place be
similar to the climate and soil in another, each variety -- le ce'page -- of the
grape will always produce the same wine. Thus some vineyards on the Yarra,
Victoria, having a similar climate and similar soil to one of the great Bordeaux
districts of France, produced a wine hardly to be distinguished from that of the
latter. Then, again, one vine may produce a choice wine in one locality, but only an
indifferent growth in another; and, conversely, a different "cepage" which does
well in the latter region is almost a failure in the former. For instance, in France,
the Gamay in the Beaujolais district, in which the soil is granitic, gives a superior
wine to the Pinot; but, on the other hand, the Pinot in the Burgundy country,
where there is a limestone formation, gives forth a world-famous wine, whilst the
Gamay is nowhere in comparison.
Next, it is necessary to remember that the effect of a warmer climate is to
increase the alcoholic strength of a wine. At the same time, however, it must not
be forgotten that this effect is greater in some varieties than in others. One
"cepage," giving in a cool region a wine of 18 per cent. of alcohol, when
transported to a warmer locality may show an increase to 26 per cent. of alcohol.
Another "cepage," showing 20 per cent. in the lower temperature, may only
develop 23 per cent. in the hotter districts.
It will be evident from the preceding that the greatest discrimination is
necessary in the selection of the variety for any particular region; and from the
knowledge at present at the vine-grower's command he can do no more than form
an approximate opinion of the "cepage" likely to suit his locality best. It is
recommended, therefore, that new planters, before starting their vineyards,
should carefully observe what varieties are giving the best results at any
neighbouring vineyards; if some appear to be doing better than others, they should
stick to the successful kinds. And again, it is advisable that they should be chary
of what plants other wine-growers extol, when perhaps the latter are in another
part of the country altogether and under totally different conditions of climate
and soil. Instead of committing themselves to a large purchase, therefore, they
should plant a selection of several varieties, and find out those which are the
most suitable.
THE GROWING OF THE GRAPE -- THE PREPARATION OF THE SOIL.
It is not my purpose to enter fully into the entire subject of grape-growing, for
that is too extensive to be dealt with here; nevertheless, there are many points
about it of Australian concern, over which there has been considerable discussion.
This shows that our vignerons, instead of placidly following out old lines, are
determined to find out for themselves the methods which will give the best
results. That such a spirit is in active existence is unquestionably a source of
satisfaction to those who have the welfare of Australian viticulture at heart, for
it is only by a determination to find out the best course to be pursued in the many
points connected with grape-growing, and more especially with wine-making, that
we can hope to reach perfection.
And although we have the climate, and the soil, and everything in our
favour, yet it must be recollected that there are vignerons of the very highest
excellence in the old wine-making countries, and that it will only be by surpassing
them that we can hope to secure the markets of the world. As I have already said,
my own belief is that the best way of infusing vigour into our wine-making industry
is to arouse public interest in the subject; and with that object in view, therefore, I
shall endeavour to bring forward those matters which are of Australian
viticultural importance.
Even at the outset we come against a disputed point, about which there has been,
and is still, considerable diversity of opinion. It is to what depth the ground should
be cultivated. On the one hand, there are some who affirm that a shallow depth of
8 or 9 inches, or even of 6 inches, is quite a sufficient penetration of the soil for
most land; but, on the other, there are many who, while conceding the fact that a
superficial cultivation like this may be successful for a few years, are strongly
opinioned that a deeper working is eventually necessary. More than this, they
contend that, even admitting good results were obtained by simple ploughing, yet
they would have been still better with a deeper working. It would seem, however,
that climate has a good deal to do with the matter. In the hot districts the vine
attains a far greater development than in the cooler parts, and the roots require
a deep soil. And besides this, in the warm regions the wine is naturally too strong,
and the deeper the soil is worked the lighter the wine will be.
But there is one thing in particular which should not be overlooked, and it is that
the land should be in a state of fine sub-division. One American writer insists that
the ground before planting should be "as fine as bolted flour." This expression
serves very well to show the importance of a thorough pulverisation of the
soil; and the best results are certainly obtained .where this is energetically carried
out.
THE GROWING OF THE GRAPE -- LAYING OUT THE VINEYARD.
The next thing in order is that of laying out the vineyard, in which it will be
desirable to consider what distance apart the vines are to be planted. This matter
of spacing the vines is one about which there is still considerable disagreement;
and the question as to whether they should be planted near to one another, or far
apart, is yet unsettled. But the truth is no inflexible rule can be laid down, as the
climate, the soil, and the "cepage" all exercise a controlling influence. It seems to
be generally admitted that in the warm districts the vines should be planted
farther apart than in the cooler regions.
In a hot climate the vigour of the plant is increased by the great amount of light
and heat which it receives. The must will be too strong, therefore, and it is only by
planting the vines at a greater distance apart than usual, and also by pruning very
long, that the resulting wine will be rendered sufficiently light in strength. In a
cooler region, on the other hand, where the vigour of the plant is less, the crop on
each vine must be reduced by short pruning, so as to increase the percentage of
glucose in the must and ensure a good wine. And where the size of the plant is
lessened by this method of pruning, the vines must be placed closer together in
order to make use of all the available soil. This latter itself has also to be thought
of in this matter of spacing the vines. In a rich soil, where the vigour of the plant
is increased, the vines should be placed farther apart; in a poor soil, on the
contrary, they should be planted closer together.
Mr. Francois de Castella, formerly Expert to the Board of Viticulture, the author
of The Handbook on Viticulture for Victoria, and who is now the proprietor of
the Tongala vineyard, in an instructive article on viticulture in Victoria lays down
the following rules with regard to the spacing of vines: -- "There is for each
locality, with the same conditions of soil and climate, a certain distance,
we may call the optimum, at which vines will thrive best; if this distance
be increased they will not improve, and may even deteriorate. Unless this be
a distance which cannot conveniently be worked by horse labour, it would evidently
be a waste of land to plant any wider, and would entail the use of unnecessary
labour for its cultivation. It would be just as foolish to plant vines any closer than
this, as it would give unnecessary pruning, disbudding, tying up, &c. -- that is, if
the climate be such that grapes will ripen satisfactorily.
"I have come to the conclusion that in our district (Lilydale, a cool region) the
optimum distance is 4 1/2 by 4 1/2 feet, practically 2,000 vines per acre, at
least in the poorer soils; and, after careful observation, I am of opinion that vines
planted any wider will not bear more fruit. This is, however, rather too close to be
conveniently worked by horse labour. I should, therefore, recommend 5 by 5 feet.
But on the Murray (a warm region) this distance would not suit at all, and I believe
that the vine-growers are right to plant 8 by 8, and even 10 by 10 feet, in that
district.
"In conclusion, I would advise every vine-grower starting in a new district to
determine by experiment what is his optimum distance. He can make a pretty good
guess from observations of soil and climate, and for the rest let him, instead of
planting all his vineyard on one scale, plant different blocks at different distances
apart, so that if he wishes to extend his vineyard later on he may know
what is the most suitable way to do so. By a careful consideration of these and
other points which regulate the growth and development of the vine, and a
practical application of the deductions drawn from them, it is possible for the
intelligent vigneron to obtain from his land a maximum of return with a minimum
of labour, and also to regulate the strength of his wine so as to suit the
requirements of trade, thus making viticulture one of the most remunerative as
well as most attractive branches of agriculture."
In France, especially in the northern districts, the vines are placed much closer
together than ever they are in Australia, and this means that only hand labour can
be employed. But it has to be remembered that the scarcity of manual labour with
us makes it necessary to arrange the vineyard with enough width between the
plants for a horse. rt is desirable, however, not to go to the other extreme and
space the vines at too great a distance from each other; indeed, in favour of a
closer planting, the following influencing circumstances should be borne in mind. In
the elevated regions, where the rainfall is ample, the vines may be planted closer
together than on the plains or on the lower slopes; firstly, because there is no
fear as to a sufficiency of water; and secondly, for the reason that the vines, by
being nearer together, protect one another from the inclement weather. Spring
frosts also are very liable to occur in certain localities; and here again the vines,
by being brought closer together, afford shelter to each other from the direct
rays of the sun, which are particularly injurious when coming on top of a severe
frost.
Then again, although some believe that in dry districts it is better to give each
vine plenty of space, yet there are others who are of opinion that a closer
formation is rather an advantage. And on this account: that since the roots
come in contact with one another, they are compelled to strike deeper in
search of water - just in the very place it is desirable they should go. In addition to
the foregoing, it must not be forgotten that a dark-coloured soil absorbs more of
the sun's heat than one of lighter colour; just as a dark coat is hotter to wear
than a light-coloured one. For this reason, therefore, it is better for the plants to
be closer together in a dark soil, since the shadow of the vines will then be over
the root-producing areas.
In the South Australia Vinegrowers' Manual, which has been prepared by Mr.
George Sutherland, under instructions from the Government of South Australia,
the author expresses this conviction: That a very large proportion of the new
vineyards of South Australia will be planted wide, especially in the warmer
districts and on the lower rises of the foothills; but that after all 6 feet may be
found the most suitable on more elevated localities, where we shall have to look
for some of the best wines of the claret and hock type. One leading Californian
authority, according, to Mr. Sutherland, was a great advocate for wide planting.
After an exhaustive inquiry into the matter, however, throughout the
wine-producing countries of Europe, he became quite converted, and believed in
closer planting. Mr. Francois de Castella also records the fact that in a block of
vines at St. Hubert's (Lilydale, Victoria), every second vine was rooted out on
one-half of the block. After ten years it was found that on the whole the closer
wines had done better than those from which every alternate vine was rooted out.
THE GROWING OF THE GRAPE -- WHETHER TO PLANT CUTTINGS
OR ROOTED VINES.
There is another somewhat disputed matter connected with viticulture, which
deserves a little notice; and it is the relative merits of planting cuttings or
rooted vines in the vineyard. The majority of the witnesses examined by the Royal
Commission on Vegetable Products in Victoria, 1889, admitted that cuttings
ultimately produced a better vine. But, as in some of the preceding points at
issue, may it not be that climate and soil have a great deal to do with the results?
Signor Romeo Bragato, the Expert to the Board of Viticulture in Victoria, in his
Hints to Intending Vine-growers, recommended cuttings, not only for
cheapness, but because if planted in the vineyard at the first they did not require
removal.
In the course of his advice he proceeded to remark: -- "The ways used here and
elsewhere by the vine-grower are two -- namely, by cuttings, and rooted vines -
but they do not always agree which of the two is the better. There are many who
say that, for the new plantation, rooted vines must be preferred; others maintain
that it is better to plant by cuttings, because they grow more nourishing and give
the vine a longer life. Both these methods are good and to be recommended; but,
in a general way, I would advise you to stick to the cuttings, and that not only
because by planting them you will have a sensible economy, but also because if you
plant the cuttings in the vineyard you will never have to more them. If you use
rooted vines, it is impossible, notwithstanding all your care and attention, for you
to carry them from the nursery to the vineyard without hurting their roots, which
are very delicate.
" But if the ground which you intend to plant with vines were loose and arid, then I
would never hesitate to advise you to always use in that case rooted vines,
because the cuttings without roots would not absorb the rainy water which in such
kind of soil runs away in the same time it takes to fall. This is the reason why, in
such a soil, the cuttings seldom strike.
"On the selection of the cuttings depends the future of the vineyard, but
of this the vine-growers are not sufficiently persuaded, because they do not pay
all the attention required for this delicate operation. In fact, when in the vineyards
in order to cut the cuttings, they take the thin and thicks -- those growths on the
new wood and on the old -- without making any distinction, and without knowing if
the old vine gives fruit or not. Many also, without other care, leave their cuttings
in the vineyard for months exposed to the air, sun, and rain; not thinking that the
very porous wood gets dry very quickly, and becomes weak near the buds. Others,
again, buy their cuttings without knowing to what variety of vine they belong, and
how they were preserved. It is not surprising, therefore, that these negligent
vine-growers, after having incurred great expense in preparing the soil and
planting the vineyard, besides having their vineyard planted with so many
varieties, are compelled to pull up a great number of cuttings that have not
struck, or, having struck, do not carry fruit."
THE GROWING OF THE GRAPE -- THE HEIGHT OF THE VINE ABOVE
THE GROUND.
The young vine takes about four years to reach its fruit-bearing stage. During this
time the plant requires to be properly trained so as to obtain the best results
from the growing grape. Now, although there are many different systems of
rearing vines, yet in the main they consist of an upright stem or trunk, and an
upper part or crown -- the latter varying considerably in shape. Thus we have the
"gooseberry-bush" style, which is employed for those vines requiring short
pruning. Then there is the "trellising" style, for the long-pruned varieties, in which
the vine is trained to a great distance along a wire. Indeed, these two
methods may be taken to represent the two main styles of training the vine;
although the different modifications used in various countries are almost endless.
There is, however, one important point which requires attention, no matter what
system is adopted, and it is the height of the vine above the ground. The nearer a
vine is to the ground, the more radiated light and heat it receives, and as a
consequence its resulting nine is stronger. In vines so near the ground, also, the
alkaline dust arising from the soil neutralises the natural acid of the fruit, and
prejudicially affects the fermentation of the wine.
As a matter of fact the earthy taste -- got de terroir -- which is sometimes
present in wine, is believed to be caused by a certain amount of soil being present
on the grapes during fermentation. This must be looked to, especially in the
warmer districts, where by giving the wine a greater distance above the ground, a
lighter, more delicate, and better wine, quite free from the foregoing demerit, is
produced.
The testimony of experts throughout Australia is unanimously in favour of raising
the vine sufficiently above the ground, so as to keep the grapes well off the soil,
and also to provide for the free circulation of air beneath. It is true that in some
parts of the Continent the practice for ages has been to keep the vines well down
against the earth. But this is done to secure the advantages of the radiated heat,
and enable the grapes to ripen. In Australia, however, even in the elevated
districts, the sun is usually warm enough to ripen the grapes without this being
necessary.
THE GROWING OF THE GRAPE -- ON PRUNING.
Before leaving these references to the growing of the grape I purpose making a
few remarks upon pruning, a subject which is as interesting as it is important. The
objects of pruning are manifold. By it the cultivation of the wine is
facilitated; the best results are obtained from each variety of grape; the yield is
increased; the product is more uniform in character; and the quality of the wine is
vastly improved. But a great deal of the work of pruning is so entirely technical
that it would utterly fail to possess any attraction for the general reader.
Consequently I shall attempt no more than to briefly refer to those particular
matters which are of Australian concern.
Now, it is laid down as a rule for pruning that some vines should be pruned short,
while others require long pruning; that is to say, one variety of wine requires to be
repressed, as it were, and in another the branches have to be kept long to
produce a superior quality of wine. The explanation is that while the sap is on its
way through the roots, the stem, the branches, and the shoots of the vine, for
the production of fruit, it is distilled out, so to speak, during its passage from the
earth to the fruit. As Mr. George Sutherland prettily puts it, the grape is, in fact,
the crowning product of the whole plant. In this way, the farther the sap has to
travel through the whole vine on its way to the growing fruit, the better will the
resulting wine be.
To a certain extent this is true of all vines, but more especially so in the case of
Shiraz and some of the Pinots. In various districts of France, in order to bring the
grape to perfection, the vine-growers will train out their main branches along
trellises to a length of 50 and even 60 feet, so as to give the sap the longest
possible distance to travel; and, further, for the purpose of concentrating into
the fruit the whole result of the wine, all the buds and little shoots, which would
distract therefrom, are carefully taken away. This gives to the vine a very curious
look, but it serves well to illustrate how greatly wines differ as to whether they
require short or long pruning. It also helps to a better understanding of the two
main styles of training the vine already mentioned, namely, the "gooseberry bush"
and the "trellising."
The fact that this elaboration of the sap in long-pruned vines requires a long
distance to intervene between the roots and the fruit itself, is one of considerable
importance. It is necessary to remember, however, that cultivation of this kind
requires additional labour. Moreover, one of the principal reasons why the
short-pruned vine has become such a favourite in Australia is that it is a
labour-saving vine, and therefore its adoption is almost a necessity. But, as Mr.
Sutherland remarks, "there is no doubt that Australia can never hope to produce
in any quantity the finest qualities of wine until the vignerons attend more to
those practices which depend essentially upon the fundamental fact that the sap
flows with different habits through different varieties of vines; and, therefore,
that some vines require short pruning, while it is even more important to
remember that others will only yield satisfactorily under a system of long
pruning."
In a paper on viticulture, at Mildura, which was drawn up for the Royal Commission
on Vegetable Products in 1890, Mr. Francois de Castella, a former expert to the
Board of Viticulture, Victoria, has condensed so much knowledge within a small
compass that I have quoted the following: --
"Most of the settlers I met told me that they intended to prune their vines short. Now,
in my opinion, they could not make a greater mistake -- for wine-growing, at least; as
for raisin-growing I have never taken any interest in the subject, and, having no
experience, do not wish to express an opinion on it. I must say that all the settlers I
had occasion to speak to were raisin-growers, but I should warn any future
wine-grower at Mildura, who may chance to read these few notes, to beware of short
pruning.
"Most of our vineyard labourers come from the cold parts of Europe, such as
Switzerland, where grapes ripen with difficulty under ordinary circumstances, and
where the vine does not take any considerable development. There, short pruning has
to be resorted to in order to make a drinkable wine. When these men arrive in
Australia they bring all their old habits and prejudices with them, and tell the
inexperienced vineyard proprietor that long pruning weakens the vine. The
proprietor, thinking that they know more about the subject than he does, allows them
to do as they like, and they set to work to cut the vine down to such an extent that,
unable to take advantage of the genial climate to which it has been transplanted, it
gives only one-eighth or one-tenth of the quantity of grapes it could be made to bear
with intelligent pruning, besides being much weakened; whereas long-pruning
strengthens a vine if the climate be favourable to its development.
"Another disadvantage of short pruning in warm climates is the well-known fact that
the less grapes you have on the vine, the more glucose the must will contain;
therefore, instead of making much more per acre of a drinkable wine, which they
easily could do, they content themselves with a much smaller quantity per acre of a
wine which ferments so badly that alcohol has to be added to prevent the production of
lactic acid, resulting from the excessive temperature reached during fermentation
favouring the development of this particular germ.
"The resulting wine, a curious mixture of alcohol, sugar, lactic acid, and water, is
most unpalatable, sour, uninviting, and unwholesome. besides ruining the name of
Australian wine when sold as such.
"I may here warn vine-growers against the advice given to them by some would-be
authorities, who tell them they can make a light wine by picking grapes before they
are ripe. This is absurd. The unripe grape contains a certain percentage of vegetable
acids, such as tartaric, malic, &c., &c. some of which are themselves converted into
glucose during the process of ripening, whilst others are eliminated after helping to
transform the starch of the vegetable tissues into glucose. It stands to reason that if
the fruit be picked before complete maturity, these acids, which are not capable of
fermenting, will be found unchanged in the wine produced, thereby rendering it acid
and undrinkable. It is, of course, necessary, in warm climates, to pick the grapes
before they get over-ripe or shrivel up; but it would be just as foolish to rush to the
other extreme, and pick the fruit too soon.
"If, instead of blindly following the mode of culture which has been adopted in a cold
climate, the vine-grower would listen to the dictates of reason, and were to
try a few inexpensive experiments, he would soon find out his mistake, and confer a
boon on himself as well as on his neighbour, not to speak of the consumers of his wine.
"Even in the cooler districts of Victoria, such as the Yarra Valley, I do not know of any
variety of vine which is weakened by long pruning, even in a series of years; while
certain varieties are so influenced by short pruning as to bear no fruit at all. If this
be the case on the Yarra, how much more must it be so on the Murray?"
Mr. de Castella then referred to some other matters connected with the practices
followed at Mildura, and concluded with these encouraging words: --
"I contend that no other culture will give such magnificent returns, do so much good to
a country, or have greater attractions for the happy proprietor of the vineyard, as
there is no branch of agriculture which presents such a vast field for experimental
research, or which is so extensively benefited by the practical application of
scientific laws and principles, as viticulture."
THE MAKING OF THE WINE -- THE CELLAR.
Up till this time our whole attention has been taken up with everything that has to
do with the production of the grape. But with the gathering of the crop a complete
change has taken place, for nature no longer exercises such a controlling
influence. At this stage the art of winemaking really begins, and the climate, the
soil, and all the other factors that have so much to do with the growth of the
grape assist us no longer. From the moment that the grapes are gathered till the
wine is ready for bottling is a most eventful period; for, during this important
time, under proper treatment, wine may be made to reach perfection.
Indeed, it is only by paying the most minute attention to all the details connected
with the making of wine that Australian vignerons will succeed in placing our wines
before all others; because it is very important to remember that the must
produced in Australia is equal, if not superior, to any in the world. Now, all that
follows this portion relates to wine-making alone; and it should for that very
reason, therefore, possess a special interest for us. Moreover, it will be a good
thing for the wine industry, for Australia, and for her people, when such an
interest becomes part of our daily life.
Naturally the first thing to suggest itself, therefore, in the making of the wine, is
the place in which it is made. There is no doubt that in Australia the importance of
a proper cellar has never been sufficiently appreciated. But the French have a
proverb, "the cellar makes the wine," showing that it plays no inconsiderable part
in the production of good wine. As Mr. Walter W. Pownall, the representative of
the Australian Wine Company, explained before the Vegetable Products
Commission in Victoria, a knowledge of cellar routine and cellar work would aroid
the spoiling of much good wine. A man thinks when he has grown the wine that is
all that is necessary. But the fact is, a wine-grower has never done with his wine
till it has passed out of his hands.
There was a valuable pamphlet on Australian wines written by the late Doctor
Bleasdale, of Melbourne, in 1876. It is now out of print, and regrettedly so, for the
worthy Doctor was one of the best connoisseurs of wine Australia ever had. Mr. L.
Bruck, the well-known medical publisher of Sydney, however, has placed me under
considerable obligation by giving me his own copy, and in the preface therein I note
that the author, in speaking of this very question, remarks: -- "I would here
reiterate what I have often stated, namely, that if the cellar management in the
three colonies were equal to the magnificent produce of the vines, no "country on
the earth could surpass, in quality and variety "of kinds, Victoria, South Australia,
and New South Wales."
Then again, Mr. James Smith, of Melbourne, in the course of his admirable prize
essay on Australian wine, which appeared in Greville's Year Book of Australia
for 1886, has these observations on this subject: - "It is, however, in the
management of the cellar that one must look for the most efficient means of
securing that uniformity of quality which I regard as such an important
desideratum. If it be not a science, it is certainly an art requiring special
knowledge, training, and experience, combined, perhaps, with natural aptitude. And
it is precisely in this respect, I fear, that our deficiency in Australia is greatest.
"In the wine-making countries of Europe the cellarmaster is an expert who inherits
the skill, traditions, methods, and usages of many generations of men who have
adopted and followed the same calling. His organs of smell and taste have been
educated to practise the nicest discrimination of flavour and odour, and if the
vintage of a particular year differs in quality from that of its predecessor, he
knows how, by a judicious blending of the old with the new, of the highly-coloured
with the pallid, to arrive at that uniformity which is so indispensable."
The cellar must neither be too damp nor too dry. Any excess of dampness would
rot the casks and give a musty taste to the wine; while, on the contrary, in too
dry a cellar the staves of the casks would shrink and cause leakage. The cellar is
usually kept somewhat dark. The openings for the admission of air and light should
be provided with shutters, so that the atmosphere and temperature may be under
control. The floor of the cellar should be paved or cemented, be well levelled, and
cleanliness throughout should be strictly and strenuously maintained.
But the following remarks of Signor Bragato as to what a cellar ought not to be
will perhaps be more instructive, and besides they contain a vast amount of
information on the subject. In referring to some of the cellars he came
across during his tour of inspection through one of the Victorian districts, he
writes: --
"The majority of the buildings used as cellars are nothing less than wooden sheds,
with galvanized iron roofs. Here the air has a free circulation day and night, and the
cellerman is thus rendered powerless to control the temperature, which very often,
from 100¡ in day time, goes down to 54¡ or less during the night. The appliances
required for winemaking are all round badly preserved, and are covered with
mouldiness and dust. The floor of the buildings is not paved or cemented, and it
consists of earth, so that it has the power of absorbing the wine that gets spilt and
becomes the source of pernicious germs, which will spread all over the cellar and in
the air, to be finally deposited in the must and in the wine, causing irreparable loss in
the quality of the wine. There are a few good cellars, but these, also, are badly kept
and badly used.
"The casks are neglected, and the coat of tartar is scrupulously left in the cask, with
the erroneous idea that it tends to preserve the wine. All the empty casks I have smelt
in the cellars inspected are impregnated with bad odours, which are not detected by
the majority of the owners, in consequence of having accustomed their olfactory
organs to the predominant odour of mouldiness in their cellars, and so they are unable
to detect if the odour of their casks is healthy or not.
"With the bad cellars which the vignerons have at their disposal, combined with the
neglect of the casks and other appliances, and the little care in the preservation of the
wine, it is only natural that a large quantity of the wine produced is spoiled, and
condemned to the still to be converted into inferior brandy of bad taste and colour,
which is often used to fortify the wines, with the result of rendering them unfit for
consumption. "Amongst the wines I have tested, I found some really very good ones,
presenting all the characteristics required in a fine wine. But if there are good wines,
there are also very bad ones, and these, I am sorry to say, represent the bulk in every
cellar I visited. Some of the wines are cloudy, sweetish, with a good deal of asperity.
Others present tartaric, lactic, and acetic fermentations."
After some further comments on various other matters, the same gentleman
concludes his report with the following: --
"Finally, I may say that by what I have seen I cannot help expressing the opinion that
Australia is capable of producing really fine wines, to be highly appreciated
in the world's markets. But to produce an appreciable wine, it is necessary that the
vignerons should improve in their system of wine-making, and substitute for their
sheds cellars constructed on a rational principle; and by devoting more attention to the
cleanliness of the casks and other cellar appliances. A modification in the system of
cultivation and pruning of the vines will also be factors in improving the quality of
the wine.
"There is in this country good soil, and a climate which cannot be equalled for the
successful cultivation of the vine. Capital is plentiful, and the people very
enterprising; so there remains only the want of Technical Instruction, by the
institution of practical schools of Viticulture, without which it is doubtful if ever its
vignerons will succeed in making wines likely to be appreciated in the foreign
markets."
In the same way Mr. J.A. Despeissis, of the New South Wales Department of
Agriculture, also insists upon cellar cleanliness. And it would seem, indeed, that
there is ample justification for his deprecatory remarks. It appears that on
several occasions he has noticed fowls and pigeons roosting in the wine cellars.
Now, as he pungently observes, the wine cellar was never intended for this sort of
thing. Another way of putting the matter would be to point out what a mad thing it
would be to use a fowl house as a cellar. Moreover, he gives minute directions for
disinfecting the cellar, in order to destroy any germs or minute organisms which
may be lurking in crevices or in odd corners. This is best accomplished by burning
some sulphur in earthenware pots, distributed over various parts of the cellar;
previously seeing that all the windows and gaps are rendered air-tight by means of
bagging. The fumes should be left in the cellar -- for a day or two, after which the
doors are opened, and a free current of air allowed to sweeten the whole place.
Moreover, a model cellar is necessarily a very elaborate affair, considering it is
the laboratory, so to speak, in which the wine is created. A model cellar would
consist of the following six compartments: --
1. The section for the first treatment of the grape.
2. The fermentation department.
3. The section for the preparation and storing, of the new wine.
4. The underground cellar for the storage of the matured wine.
5. The bottle department.
6. The distillation department and for the utilization of the refuse of wine.
The cellar of Mr. Henley, near the Ovens River, in Victoria, is very complete. It is
provided with a steam lift, a steam crushing machine, and a steam pump, while
there is perfect ventilation and a uniform temperature. His cellar is divided into
three compartments: the fermenting house in the middle, the cellar for the new
wine, and the cellar for the old wine. The building is 83 feet by 80 feet, built of
brick, with double walls 9 inches thick outside and 4 inches inside, and between the
walls there is 4 1/2 inches of space. The temperature on the hottest days in the
summer never surpasses 80¡ Fahrenheit; and, lastly, the floors, both of the
cellars and the fermenting house, are cemented for the purpose of absolute
cleanliness.
THE MAKING OF THE WINE -- THE GATHERING OF THE GRAPE.
At the very beginning one of the chief matters to be looked to is the selection of
the time at which the grapes should be picked. The proper period is that when the
interior of the grape contains its principal components, the sugar and the acids, in
the right proportions. In the warmer districts the grapes are sometimes allowed
to become too ripe. In such a case there would be an excess of sugar and a
deficiency of acid, and a regular fermentation would be impossible. On the other
hand, it will be remembered in the course of the remarks upon pruning that
I quoted Mr. Francois de Castella to show what a mistaken idea it is to pick the
grapes before they are thoroughly ripe in order to produce, as it is erroneously
supposed, a lighter wine. It is of the greatest consequence, therefore, to choose
that particular time for gathering the grapes when they contain the respective
elements in their strictly proper proportions.
On the eventful day for the picking of the grapes the weather should be fine and
bright, and in the warm districts they should be picked early in the morning and
late in the afternoon, so that they are not too warm. The grapes should never be
taken to the fermenting house when too heated; indeed, it would be better not to
crush the grapes at all than to have them in such a state. As Signor Bragato
observes, if they are too warm the fermentation will start with too high a
temperature in the must, and very likely the result will be the formation of lactic
and acetic germs. In Algiers and other warm regions the grapes picked in the day
are left outside during the night; by this means the temperature of the must is
lowered.
In the picking of the grapes the greatest care should be taken to discard the
mouldy, dry, and dirty grapes, and leaf insect worms should likewise be got rid of.
Once the gathering of the grapes is commenced it should be concluded as quickly
as possible, and therefore a sufficient number of hands must be engaged for the
purpose. For instance, with the Riesling, if the grapes are left on the vines on a
hot day twenty-four hours after they arrive at perfection, the wine will not be
nearly so good.
THE MAKING OF THE WINE -- VARYING ADDITIONS TO THE MUST.
On the arrival of the grapes at the press-house, the first thing to be determined
upon is whether the stalks are to be used or not. In the case of white wines
it is not customary to separate them from the grapes. A good deal, however, will
depend upon different circumstances. Thus, when grapes are grown in flat, damp
places, or during wet seasons, it is often advantageous to ferment the berries
with part of their stems; but, on the contrary, those grapes which contain a
sufficiency of tannin will not require the latter. For example, in the production of
white wines at Mr. Hans Irvine's ("Great Western") vineyard in Victoria, the grapes
are first crushed with the mill, the mill consisting of two grooved wooden rollers
working against each other. After this the skins, together with the stalks, are
placed in the wine-press. In the case of red wine, however, the grapes are
separated from the stalks by means of an iron griddle, so that only the skins are
employed in the formation of the wine.
The methods pursued with regard to the elimination or retention of the grape
stalks vary in different parts of the Continent. The most careful vignerons
remove the stalks in the case of the finest growths of Burgundy; but in the
making of champagne, and also in the Rheingau, from which part come the famous
Hock wines, the stalks are allowed to remain. In the Me'doc districts, which produce
the finest clarets, the stalks are likewise put into the fermentation vat; but this
is considered to be a great mistake, since a long time elapses before the
astringent taste of the wine subsides. With the far-famed Red Hermitage wine of
France, too, the stalks are permitted to pass into the vat, and in the case of
sherry and port, as well, the stalks all take part in the fermentation, though it is
believed that better results would be obtained by their removal. But in all these old
wine-producing countries of Europe the same customs have been followed from
time immemorial, and they are not likely to be altered at present.
THE MAKING OF THE WINE -- THE MUST ITSELF.
The must -- that is, the juice expressed from the grape, but in which (juice)
fermentation has not yet taken place - is a fluid of very complex composition. It is
made up of a variety of ingredients, with which it is necessary to become familiar
in order to follow, during the process of fermentation, its change into wine. We
find, therefore, that a large part of the must consists of water; this serves to
dissolve the other constituents, and to dilute them to the required extent. For
instance, the sugar in the must needs to be considerably diluted for the purposes
of fermentation. In too concentrated a form it actually prevents it, as we see
when fruits are preserved in syrup.
Next to water, sugar is the material which exists in the largest proportions in the
must; it is, however, that peculiar kind of sugar termed " glucose," which may be
described as uncrystallisable sugar, and as consisting of half grape sugar and half
fruit sugar. It possesses the property of being able to ferment, which cane or
crystallisable sugar cannot do, unless, indeed, it first be changed into glucose.
Now, it is a curious fact that although cane sugar can be transformed into
glucose, yet the latter form of sugar has never, so far, been changed into cane or
crystallisable sugar. As Mr. J.A. Despeissis points out, the invention of a process
that would achieve this would be worth more than all the mines of New South
Wales put together.
In the process of fermentation the glucose is broken up into a number of
substances, which differ entirely from it; and as these different bodies are very
important they deserve much attention. Under the influence of fermentation
glucose undergoes a great change, of which the principal products are alcohol and
carbonic acid gas. The alcohol is, of course, the one predominant feature in wine;
and according to the amount of alcohol which wine contains, so it varies in
strength.
In addition to these two main products of glucose by fermentation, namely, alcohol
and carbonic acid gas, there are glycerine and succinic acid, as well as a lesser
proportion of other derivatives, very much akin to alcohol. Of all these glycerine is
by no means unimportant, as it confers a blandness or mellowness upon the wine.
The succinic acid, also, is distinctive for this reason, that it is the source of that
characteristic flavour in wine known as "vinosity."
Besides the water and the glucose, the must likewise contains quite an appreciable
amount of those important bodies, the various acids. These consist of tartaric
acid, so frequently met with all through the vegetable world; of malic acid, which is
the acid almost distinctive of apples; of tannic acid or "tannin," and of other
acids. These different acids play an important part in the production of wine;
without them, in truth, it would be a mere admixture of spirits and water -- a
colourless, flavourless, and insipid product. By their assistance, however, wine is
endowed with the brilliancy it possesses. And more than this, the action of the
alcohol on these acids develops those exquisitely delicate ethers -- the oenanthic
and other ethers -- which constitute, in fact, the bouquet of the wine. At the
same time, it has also to be remembered that while these many acids constitute
the life and soul, so to speak, of the wine, their very presence is absolutely
necessary for the process of vinous fermentation. That is to say, the active
agents of vinous fermentation are only enabled to work perfectly in a liquid which
is somewhat acid.
There is an astringent principle, named tannin, which calls for attention in any
reference to wine-making. It is almost the same body -- not quite -- as the tannin
obtained from galls, and so largely employed in tanning. This vine-tannin, if it may
be so termed, does not exist in the juice of the grape, but in the stalk and the
skin. The white wines, in which the juice is almost always freed from the skins and
stalks, contain but little tannin; while, on the contrary, most red wines, in which
juice, skins, and stalks are all included together in the fermenting-vat, contain a
good deal. Some white wines derive their tannin from the oaken casks which hold
the wine; and their colour, in consequence, subsequently deepens. Other red wines,
strange to say, gradually lose their dark colour from a certain action of the
tannin. So that tannin is the cause of some white wines deepening in colour, while
it renders other red wines of a lighter colour. Now, tannin has the effect of
preserving albuminous substances, and in this way it may be beneficial in rendering
red wines more durable. But although this may be advisable in wines which are
liable to turn, it is certain that excess of tannin is most undesirable. In fact, the
practice of placing the stalks in the fermenting-vat is in many cases, as I have
previously stated, an unnecessary proceeding.
The mineral kingdom is not unrepresented in must, and certain saline substances
are found in it. Of these, the salts of potash are uniformly present, and the most
important is, without doubt, the acid tartrate of potash. This is the salt so well
known in commerce under the name of cream of tartar. The lees of wine contain it
in considerable quantity, and it is also found as a crystalline deposit in the inside
of the casks. As the alcohol begins to develop in the must this salt is precipitated,
and the more so the lower the temperature. Thus it is that a light wine of low
alcoholic strength, if it be markedly acid, will lose the acidity in a cool,
underground cellar. And, as a matter of fact, the proper maturation of a wine is
impossible without a due amount of tartar; besides this, it develops in the wine a
well-defined vigour and tonicity, which improves its taste, while it also increases
its alimentary qualities.
There are a few other ingredients in must, namely, the colouring matters
and essential oils, and the albuminoids, or nitrogenous substances. The colouring
matters and oils appear to be contained in the cells of the inner side of the skin.
Of these, the purpose of the colouring matter is obvious; while the essential oils
are believed to contribute to the "aroma" of the wine. The albuminoids or
nitrogenous substances are of the nature of white of egg; and, when in small
proportion, are necessary for the due performance of the fermentative process.
But, in excess, they are a source of considerable anxiety to the vigneron, in that
they are the cause of much of the wine going wrong.
THE MAKING OF WINE -- FERMENTATION.
The must, as we have already seen, is the juice of the grape, which has been
squeezed out by the grape-mill or from the wine-press. The murk, or pomace as it
is called in America, on the contrary, is the mass of grape skins, stalks, &c., left
behind in the press. A clear apprehension of these two terms is required in order
that no confusion may arise. The fermenting-vat is the cask in which what is
called the strong, stormy, or tumultuous fermentation takes place. The "cuvage"
is the length of time the contents are left in the fermenting-vat.
The whole phenomena of fermentation are too complicated and profoundly
scientific to be dealt with here. I shall do no more, therefore, than briefly refer to
the behaviour of the must in the fermenting-vat. Fermentation sets in soon after
the must is placed within the latter. The germs of vinous fermentation are
contained in abundance in the air of the wine cellar, as well as being on the grapes
themselves. M. Pasteur, who has contributed so much to a proper understanding
of fermentation, has proved that the yeast fungi come from the external surface
of the grapes, and are not derived from the interior. Hence it follows that
the skins are to be well crushed before fermentation begins, to ensure proper
action in the must.
The temperature of the must soon begins to rise, and the fermentative agencies
break up its glucose into alcohol and carbonic acid gas. There is a bubbling and
seething in the liquid during this action, which gradually subsides. The increase of
temperature in the fermented fluid begins to abate; the skins and husks subside
to the bottom of the vat; the liquid itself becomes slightly less turbid -- and the
first stage of wine-making is at an end.
A clearer insight into this important part of the process will perhaps be gained by
noting some of the practices followed on the Continent, as regards the duration of
the vattage. The length of time the various contents -- whether they be the
grape juice alone, or the grape juice together with the skins and stalks -- remain
within the fermenting-vat, varies greatly in different parts. In the Champagne
country, the must is allowed to stand for twelve or eighteen hours, during which
time a froth arises to the top and a sediment descends to the bottom. Without
disturbing either of these, the precious liquid is carefully withdrawn into small
barrels, and the fermentation is then allowed to proceed. This purification is one
of the most important matters connected with the making of champagne.
The Me'doc districts, in the Bordeaux territory, produce the finest of the clarets.
The grapes are detached from the stalks, and subjected to pressure. The must is
put into the fermenting-vat, to which is added the murk resulting from the
pressing, and the stalks which were previously separated from the berries. The
time necessary for vinification varies; in good years it is no longer than four or
five days, and the future wine will then be at its best with regard to taste,
delicacy, and softness.
In one case, that of the Red Hermitage wine of France, the grapes are
unstalked and crushed before being placed in the vat. The contents of the latter
are then stirred twice a day, and ultimately once a day. This is continued for about
a month, and in one of the best vineyards for forty days. This long "cuvage"
appears necessary from the fact that the large amount of sugar in the must is
but slowly transformed into alcohol.
There is a curious incident which occurs in connection with the world-renowned
wines of Burgundy, which is worth recording. As the fermentation proceeds, the
murk, as in all similar fermentations, rises to the surface of the vat, and forms
what is called the "hat," or chapeau. The fermentation proceeds till all is ready
for the wine to be drawn. At this time the "hat" is so dense that it will bear the
weight of two or three men. Each of them now begins working with one foot till he
gets it through the crust, and the whole chapeau is eventually broken up and
mixed with the wine.
But to return to our subject. As soon as the stormy or seething fermentation is
over, the young wine is drawn off from the fermenting-vat into the
maturing-cask, at which time it may be quite warm and turbid. In a cool cellar and
with perfect quiet it gradually becomes clearer; it deposits on the bottom of the
cask many of the substances it contains, and the fermentation becomes no longer
visible. The time which this "slow fermentation" takes to occur will vary with the
type of wine, with the nature of the must, and with the influence of the season.
Speaking generally, it may be said to be from two to eight weeks after its
entrance into the maturing-cask. The wine is considered to be ready for its first
racking when it has become clear and transparent, and when its lees have
subsided to the bottom of the cask.
In racking there is a withdrawal of the wine from the sediment which it
casts down, and which is known as the lees. It is an important operation because
irremediable damage is caused to wine by allowing it to remain in contact with the
dregs. A knowledge of their composition is of great value, since it serves to
explain their injurious influence. The lees deposited from vinous fermentation
consist of mineral salts, tartaric acid, and organic matters. Of these the 'organic
substances are the most to be dreaded, and for this reason, that they are very
prone to rapid decomposition. They consist of yeast-cells, cells of other
micro-organisms, of de'bris and minute particles of grape stalks and skins, and of
other bodies, all readily liable to decompose. All these various materials,
therefore, are continually a source of peril, for the slightest thing may start
action in them, which spreads throughout the wine and simply ruins it. By removing
it from such undesirable company all these risks are avoided, and the best
possible qualities of the wine are afforded the opportunity to develop. In the
performance of racking definite changes take place in the vine, which are
assuredly important. For it must be remembered that the nearly fermented young
wines contain an excess of carbonic acid gas; and this is rightly regarded as
possessing great preservative properties, in that it prevents the dangerously
spreading growth of the little micro-organisms and germs present in all new wine.
In the course of racking, however, a certain amount of the carbonic acid gas must
be lost, and fresh oxygen is absorbed from the atmosphere. The oxygen is
invaluable from the fact that it exerts a powerful chemical influence upon the
wine; as a consequence fermentation is slightly renewed if there be any grape
sugar remaining. At the same time the colour of the wine is also modified, and any
rawness or harshness in its taste quality is enormously increased by the
development of those delicate and subtle ethers which have so much to do with
the flavour and bouquet of all wines.
The operation of racking, consequently, is one of great importance, as it requires
to be repeated from time to time. A copious deposit of lees generally takes place
after the first racking, and a second one should speedily follow. During the first
year young wines are often racked off as many as three times, but with the older
wines once a year, at the beginning of spring, may be sufficient. But it is precisely
in matters of this kind that judgment and experience are so much needed.
Now, it has been pointed out over and over again that it is solely by a correct
treatment of Australian wines in the cellar that we can hope to attain to
excellence; in fact, the whole secret lies in this direction. And it is very much to
be regretted, therefore, that cellar management and wine treatment have not yet
been conceded their proper position, that of being the principal factors in the
success of Australian wine. Amongst others, this very truth was pointed out by
Mr. Pownall, to whom I have previously referred. In giving evidence before the
Vegetable Products Commission of Victoria in August 1889, he observed: -- "In
some of the cellars I have been horrified with the amount of wine which I should
describe as 'perished' and as 'perishing.' It is astounding, I can hardly express the
quantity. And very often the vine-grower is so ignorant of his business that he
shows one wine which is 'tart' and 'sour,' and even praises it. I find those wines
are generally exceeding three years old, and I attribute it to the lack of cellar
knowledge and treatment, because in the same cellar where I find large quantities
of bad wine I find this year's and last year's wine good, and promising well; but if
longer kept, and so treated, after a few years it will be utterly useless."
It will only be by paying attention to all the details connected with the
cellarage of Australian wines that the victory will be ours. I have said so before,
and now say it again, that our Australian must is quite equal to, if not superior to,
any in the world. But it is from that very time that the critical stage in the making
of our wines begins. It behoves our vignerons, therefore, to concentrate their
energies mainly upon that vastly important period which follows onwards from the
very beginning of vinification.
THE TASTING AND JUDGING OF WINES.
Of the five senses, namely, seeing, hearing, feeling, smelling, and tasting, the last
is by no means the least important. It is a wise provision, this sense of taste, in
that it enables us to relish our food, and also to select that which is suitable at
the same time. If we took no pleasure in eating we should probably cease to eat at
all, and die of starvation. And if we had no taste we might eat that which was
unsuitable. In illness, almost the first things that the sufferer will complain about
are that he has lost all desire for his food, and that everything tastes alike to
him. The true taste impressions are limited to the following, namely, bitter, sweet,
sour, and salt. The best substances to mark these four varieties of taste are
quinine for the bitter, honey for the sweet, vinegar for the sour, and table salt for
the last. The sense of taste is closely associated with that of smell; indeed, the
sense of smell has nearly all to do with the perception of flavour. There is an
inseparable connection between the two senses of smell and taste, for when
anosmia or loss of the sense of smell occurs, all taste, except for bitterness,
sweetness, sourness, and saltness, is completely lost, so far as ideas of flavour,
&c., are concerned.
Brillat-Savarin, the high-priest of gastronomy, quaintly puts it that smell and
taste form only one sense, having the mouth as laboratory, with the nose
for the fire-place or chimney; the one serving to taste solids, the other gases.
George Dallas, too, the gifted author of The Book of the Table, also expresses
the association of taste and smell in an apt way. He makes reference to the fact
that the other senses are not dependent on each other, but that the hearing
becomes more acute in a blind man. On the contrary, taste is made for marriage,
and smell is its better half. Taste loses, as he says, all its delicacy when it cannot
mate with a fine olfactory nerve. The late Dr. Druitt has likewise noted that the
union of smell with taste is essential for the enjoyment of wine.
From the foregoing it will be seen that when we speak of taste we refer to a
complicated and extremely delicate process. There is this also to be remembered,
that it is a sense which can be cultivated to a high degree; and in the wine-taster
it is brought to the very pitch of excellence. Yet, notwithstanding all this, it must
be a matter of every-day experience, that people will profess to an ability to judge
wine when they know absolutely nothing of the various points, so to speak, to be
looked for. What I mean is this, that there are many different things to be
observed when a wine is tasted, and that each one requires to have proper
judgment bestowed upon it. What these are I shall endeavour to speak of in due
course.
Wine tasting is a fine art as seen with the courtiers or experts who are employed
by the large houses in Bordeaux. There are exceptional qualifications required for
this office, for its holders must possess a delicate and highly trained palate, and
an exquisite and perfect sense of smell, while at the same time a lengthened
experience and unerring discrimination in the value of the wine submitted to them
are also called for. Mr. James Smith, in his prize essay, already referred to,
quotes with approval the following passage from a French authority:--"The
courtage of wines is, then, a true science, which is acquired by long observations,
by numerous tastings, extensive practice, and a correct judgment; a science
which has rendered, and is daily rendering, true and important services to our
vinicole department (that of the Gironde); for, by this means, intelligent
classifications have given to our grands crus a universal reputation, and have
made our best wines known and appreciated throughout the civilised world. In the
judging of wines, therefore, at least four essentials are necessary: two of the
senses -- the taste and the smell must be perfect -- while great experience and
special knowledge must be equally present."
Now, there is an old saying, de gustibus non est disputandum, and consequently
every person has a perfect right to like what pleases him; so that in this way
anyone may prefer to drink whisky, or any other form of spirits, and he is quite
entitled to believe there is nothing so good for him; but, on the other hand, an
habitual spirit-drinker must not claim to possess a correct judgment in estimating
the qualities of a good wine; for, as a matter of fact, the daily influence of whisky
on the palate is absolutely fatal to its delicacy of perception. There are none of
the graceful flavours, none of the delicate ethers, none of the perfumed bouquets
in whisky that belong to a wholesome wine. No, there is only the coarse spirit
which benumbs the palatal nerves, and renders them incapable of picking out
these vinous attributes. Moreover, it would almost seem that a person's very
thoughts are controlled by his customary beverage. It is evident, indeed, that
Richard Bentley, one of the greatest scholars of modern times, believed in this
doctrine; for did he not make this memorable remark to one of his pupils: "Sir, if
you drink ale, you will think ale"?
Is it not true, also, that with many people champagne is regarded as the
highest type of wine? This is more likely to be the case with those who are
beginning to realize the pleasures of life. Indeed, as it has been acutely remarked,
a youngster from college, when invited to dinner, thinks himself badly treated if he
does not get it. Now, it is not to be denied that champagne is, in its way, an
imperial drink, and that it has a specially exhilarating effect. But, at the same
time, it must be remembered that it is on the other side of the champagne stage
of life that the appreciation of really great wines begins.
Take, for instance, a comparison of the wines of Bordeaux and of Burgundy. These
are two distinct classes of wine, and, according to Mr. Sept. Berdmore, should be
imbibed different days. That they are entirely distinct wines might only be
expected, seeing that the geographical positions of the two districts are so far
apart. The Bordeaux wines come from the south-western or Bay of Biscay side of
France, while those of Burgundy belong to her eastern portion. It is almost
universally a matter of belief that the red wines of Bordeaux should be warmed
gradually -- taking some hours -- before they are drunk. The temperature of
these wines should be as nearly as possible the temperature of the dining-room
itself. The finest clarets are often utterly spoiled from the fact that this has
been disregarded, and they have been brought to table without ally preparation. In
the case of Burgundy, however, an opposite treatment is required, and by many
connoisseurs it is considered to be best when brought up from a cool cellar
shortly before use. All these are matters of considerable importance, and show
that the judging of wines requires something more than a mere off-hand opinion.
There are certain descriptions of the different varieties of wines, given by
Thudicum and Dupre', Vizetelly and others, which are of great assistance in
helping to a knowledge of the various desiderata to be looked for. Moreover, much
will be gained by collecting them together, as their principal characteristics will be
better remembered when they are thus contrasted with each other. It is not my
wish to laud the wines of other countries to the disparagement of Australian
growths, but it is my object to show clearly those desirable properties which all
good wines should possess. A knowledge of these lofty standards will do more to
better the quality of our Australian wines than anything I know of.
The wines of the Me'doc, that district of the Gironde which produces the finest
clarets, namely, Ch‰teau Margaux, Ch‰teau Lafitte, Ch‰teau Latour, &c., possess
distinguishing features peculiar to themselves. They have a certain slight
distinctive roughness; are fine, juicy, marrowy in the mouth, and after having been
in bottle some years they acquire a very beautiful bouquet. They have, moreover,
this remarkable hygienic quality, that they can be drunk in large quantity without,
as the French say, "fatiguing" either head or stomach. But there is another
portion of the Bordeaux country, namely the Graves, which produces both red and
white wines. The latter include those magnificent Sauternes, Ch‰teau d'Yquem and
La Tour Blanche, which take such high rank; Ch‰teau d'Yquem, indeed, has been
likened to liquid gold -- liquid gold in a crystal glass -- and is one of those most
luscious and delicately aromatic of wines, with an exquisite bouquet and rich,
delicious flavour.
As it has already been stated, Bordeaux and Burgundy are entirely different
wines, and this fact must be well remembered. The wines of the latter comprise
some of the most famous growths of France, and are distinguished by the suavity
of their taste, their finesse, and spirituous aroma The red wines have a fine
colour, a good deal of bouquet, and a delicious taste. They give tone to the
stomach, and facilitate digestion. Of these red wines of Burgundy the
Romane'e-Conti is among the first growths, and it is renowned for its fine colour,
its aroma, its delicacy, and the superb quality of its delicious taste. Clos de
Vougeot is another great growth, which is slightly more alcoholic than the
preceding. Chambertin, also, possesses a good deal of sve, delicacy, perfect
taste, and pleasant bouquet; moreover, it has a softness which made it an
especial favourite with the great Napoleon. Corton, likewise, is of high colour,
corse', and, as it gets older, acquires a great deal of sve and bouquet.
The white wines of Burgundy however, must not be forgotten, for amongst them
is the renowned Chablis. This, with the oysters, the squeeze of lemon juice, and
the brown bread and butter, usually heralds in any large dinner. Although slightly
alcoholic, it is not heady, and possesses body, delicacy, and an agreeable perfume,
with that distinguishing pierre a' fusil taste -- that flinty flavour -- which is its
recognised characteristic.
Leaving the Bordeaux wines and the wines of Burgundy, it is next desirable to
speak of one which belongs to the South of France. It is well known, at least by
name, to most Australians, and any description of its properties, therefore, will
be the more appreciated. This is the Muscat of Rivesaltes, in the department of
the Oriental Pyrenees. By some it is esteemed the best liqueur wine in the world. A
good sample of it possesses great finesse, a good deal of vinosity, and that
wonderful muscadine bouquet which gives to it its celebrated characters.
There is another wine, coming from the valley of the Rhone, in the south-eastern
portion of France, whose name is equally familiar to most Australians; this is the
Red Hermitage, or, as it is perhaps more commonly known amongst us,
Shiraz, wine. A genuine wine is distinguished by great richness, a lively purple
colour, and a special bouquet; and it becomes, by these united qualities, the best
wine of this region.
Turning to the German wines, those of the Rheingau must claim our attention. This
district borders on the Rhine, and it is said that the river acts as a mirror, in
reflecting the rays of the sun towards the vineyards. The Rheingau must not be
confused with the district of Hochheim, which is situated on the Maine. Yet it is
curious that the first syllable of the latter district (Hochheim) has furnished the
monosyllabic English word Hock, under which are confused all the Rhine wines.
Amongst the wines of the Rheingau may be enumerated Steinberg, Marcobrunner,
and Johannisberg. With regard to the wines of the Rheingau, Mr. Henry Vizetelly
observes: "Although the flavour and bouquet of the grand wines of the Rheingau
are equally pronounced, it is exceedingly difficult to characterise them with
precision. After gratifying the sense of smell with the fragrant odour which they
evolve - and which is no mere evanescent essence vanishing as soon as
recognised, but often a rich odour which almost scents the surrounding
atmosphere -- you proceed to taste the vine, and seem to sip the aroma exhaled
by it. Now and then you are conscious of a refilled pungent flavour, and at other
times of a slight racy sharpness, while the after-taste generally suggests more of
an almond flavour than any other you can call to mind. No wines vary so much in
their finer qualities as the grand growths of the Rheingau. The produce of a
particular vineyard, although from the same species of grape, cultivated under
precisely similar conditions, will differ materially in flavour and bouquet, not
merely in bad and good years, but in vintages of equal excellence.
Moreover, these wines need the most skilful cellar treatment during the long
years they are maturing. All great wines, it should be remembered, ripen slowly,
and cannot be 'pasturised' into perfection - that is to say, cannot be rapidly
matured by heating them to a certain temperature, as ordinary wines may be."
The Hochheim vineyards are situated, as I have previously indicated, on the banks
of the Maine, several miles above its confluence with the Rhine. There is one
exceptionally fine Hochheim growth which comes from the vineyard of the
"Dechanei," or deanery. True Hochheinner is a remarkably aromatic wine, and
possesses both body and fire. Indeed, it contains as large a percentage of alcohol
as the so-called noble Steinberger -- the most spirituous of the Rhenish growths
-- with more sweetness. It consequently lacks that subdued acidulous freshness
of flavour which is such a marked characteristic of the wines of the Rheingau.
Some reference to sherry and port is necessary, because they are both types of
wines that are widely known, and consequently ally remarks concerning, them are
of value by comparison. It would appear that with most sherry, and certainly with
all port, there is an addition of alcohol to the wine. Even the wines which are sold in
England under the name of "natural sherry" contain from 13.2 to 15.5 per cent.
of alcohol. Beyond all question, therefore, from 1 1/2 to 3 1/2 per cent. of
alcohol must have been added, for no "natural sherry" should ever contain more
than 12 per cent. of alcohol. Some sherries, however, have been introduced with
an alcoholicity of from 12 to 13.6 per cent., with the following, characters: The
taste is freely vinous, rich, pure, mellow, and quite free from heat or the taste of
added spirit. But fashion has much to do with the type of sherry in request; thus
the colour has varied from time to time. In the same way, too, a taste for dry
sherries arose with the Manzanilla epoch, only to be carried to excess. As
with all other wines, a certain age in sherry is desirable; the ethers become
developed during this period, and impart a rich flavour to it. In the course of time,
however, sherry falls off so much that it is only fit for giving flavour to young
wine.
In the matter of port, also, it may confidently be asserted that not a single drop
is sold that does not contain a certain amount of added brandy. That is to say, all
port wine, without exception, is brandied. The effect of the brandy is to keep the
wine quiet; it prevents it from undergoing any fermentation; and, what is more, it
keeps it from changing, no matter whether the climate be hot or cold. Messrs.
Thudicum and Dupre state that a perfectly natural port has 9 per cent. of alcohol
as the lowest, and 13.8 per cent. as the highest limit.
A sample of Alto Douro wine submitted to these gentlemen, although it was
slightly alcoholised, yet possessed the following desirable qualities: it was fine,
because it was derived from the finest and ripest Alto Douro grapes, the
Verdeilho and Bastardo; it was full, owing to its great vinosity and high amount of
natural alcohol, yet free from adventitious syrup; and it was pure, because free
from all those faults which depreciate so many southern wines, such as the fousel
flavour, or the burning taste of distilled spirit. Besides all these great qualities, it
characteristically possessed the very essence of an ideal port wine flavour -
without the saccharine and spirituous taste commonly found in port wine - and it
had a natural smooth astringency such as pleases the palate and imparts keeping
qualities.
Moreover, it was very unlike the artificial sweet and burning products commonly
called port wine. It was thoroughly fermented, and contained such a minute
quantity of grape sugar that the latter could not be possibly detected by the
taste. It was perfectly dry, and thereby differed entirely from ordinary port
wines, which contain from 2 to 6 per cent. of sugar. Its alcoholicity was certainly
below all the port wines usually sold. With all these desirable qualities, therefore, it
possessed high dietetic and hygienic virtues, and refreshed the system like
Burgundy or Me'doc wine.
It will be convenient to make reference here to two terms about which there is a
great deal of confusion. It is the difference between the "aroma" and the
"bouquet" of wine. Now, the Settimana Vinicola has recently well observed that
although these two are usually supposed to be the same, yet they are entirely
different. The aroma of a wine is altogether distinct from those agreeable and
delicate odours known by the name of "bouquet." For instance, some American
grapes have what is called a "foxy" smell, and the wine prepared from them has
this aroma, which is perceptibly disagreeable. Aroma pre-exists in certain grapes,
and during vinification will pass into the resulting wine. On the other hand,
perfume, the bouquet of the French, as it has been pointed out by Professor G.
Grazzi-Soncini, is the complex sensation produced simultaneously on the palate
and nose, owing to the intimate connection between these two organs, and which
has already been referred to. This bouquet is due to the action of the ethers,
which are formed during the life of the wine. The Corriere del Villagio remarks, in
addition to the preceding, that there is a chemical difference between the
"aroma" and the "bouquet" of wine. The former is produced chiefly by one or
more carburets of hydrogen, and their oxidation derivatives. The bouquet,
however, results from the admixture of aldehydes with one or more essential oils
and various ethers, produced by combination of fatty and other acids with ethylic
and other alcohols, and from these changes result the different ethers
which constitute the bouquet of wine.
One of the most valuable books published on vine-growing and wine-making is that
by the justly celebrated Dr. Jules Guyot. The greater part of one particularly
important chapter is wholly taken up with the most graphic and lucid description
of wine-tasting with which we are acquainted. Besides this, it contains such an
amount of information on the subject, that no remarks in this connection would be
complete without reference to it. For the following vivid rendering of a good deal
of this very chapter I am very much indebted to my friend Dr. John Steel, of
Sydney: --
"Wine put upon its trial is subjected to two jurisdictions; the one altogether
belonging to the senses, the other wholly physiological. The appreciation of wine by
the senses is referred to three of our organs of sense -- the eye; the nasal chambers,
in front and behind; and the mouth, equally at its anterior and posterior part.
"Wine judged by the sight. -- Wine pleases the eye by its clearness and colour: and be
it ruby, rose, amber, or white, it ought always to have perfect clearness and
freshness of colour. Neither of these latter tones will be out of harmony in a really
good wine, even in extreme old age. If you will not take upon yourself to decide
whether a wine is good when it is attractive to the sight, you can always say that it is
not good or at least that it is not in the best condition, when its transparency and
shades of colour are questionable. Freshness of colour and clearness are good signs.
Though they are not to be regarded as qualities, yet any appearance to the contrary
betokens real defects in the wine.
"Wine judged by the sense of smell; the two odours of wine. -- Wine reveals itself by
two sorts of odours (the aroma and the bouquet) to the outer organ of smell -- that is
to say, when that sense is exercised by inhaling (or sniffing) the wine. The first, or
aroma, is the general and common odour peculiar to most wines. It is always strongest
when the wine is newest, but it always characterises good wine, however old it may
be. This first odour seems to be due to the volatilization of the spirit, which holds in
solution an essential oil, more or less volatile, more or less powerful, and more or
less characteristic of each kind of wine. This aroma is a sign of real quality in the
wine, and is generally very strong and very noticeable during the first years; it
becomes concentrated, refined, and attenuated as the wine ages. The second
kind of odour the bouquet, on the contrary, is developed with age, and would appear to
be owing to the reaction of vinous acids on the spirit, which gives rise to certain
ethereal combinations.
"Wines are not made chiefly to please the senses of sight and smell -- Aroma, like
colour, is a favourable or unfavourable sign, agreeable or disagreeable. Yet before
everything wine is a nourishing beverage. It is a very good thing that sight and smell
should be gratified in this way, but it would be puerile and ridiculous to exalt beyond
measure the importance of these organs of sense; and to pretend that the superiority of
wine rests almost exclusively on the pleasurable impressions which are derived
therefrom. I have seen many hosts bother their guests with vexatious insistence to
look at, hold up to the light, sniff their wine, even the empty glasses, almost
throughout the whole duration of a banquet - at the risk of making them well nigh die
of thirst. The true amateur, the wine-taster, knows perfectly well how to look at and
how to smell his wine; but he knows full well also that these two preliminaries ought
to be immediately followed by the taking of the fluid into the front part of the mouth.
Colour and smell are merely two notes introductory to a gastronomic theme; if they
are only by themselves they lose their relative value, and the theme is not properly
understood.
"Wine judged by taste; that is, by the mouth at its anterior and posterior part. --
Before speaking of the impression wine gives to the sense of taste, I ought to say that
this sense is the only one in the animal organization which possesses a double
apparatus for perception - one at the tip and edges of the tongue, the other at its root
and at the soft palate. The first perceives acid or electro-positive tastes through the
two lingual nerves; the second detects alkaline tastes by the two glosso-pharyngeal
nerves. Tastes perceived by the front part of the mouth, in the case of liquids as well
as solids, are not the same as those discriminated by the back part of the mouth. An
alkaline salt, for instance, gives to the front part an acid, styptic, salt, or sweet taste,
but communicates to the posterior part a basic, bitter, or saponaceous taste.
"Wine-tasting properly so called. -- Wine taken into the front part of the mouth gives
rise to acid, sweet, and styptic tastes at the outer edges and tip of the tongue. All
shades, in harmony, ought to give a pleasing sensation to the organ, when neither
acidity, sweetness, nor astringency predominates. Next we pass the wine to the
posterior part of the mouth, and delay it there by a kind of gargling. It is now that we
get the smack of the soil, the taste of cask or wood, the insipidity of salts, or any
bitterness. If the whole effect is pleasing to the back part of the mouth, with
the absence of all disagreeable impressions, we must, to put the finishing touch on the
wine-tasting, not spit it out, but swallow it. As soon as the wine has passed over the
root of the tongue and the soft palate and its pillars, a most pronounced odour ascends
from the pharynx into the nasal cavities, and gives forth newer and more powerful
revelations, AS to the qualities or defects of the bouquet of wine, than can ever be
obtained by the outward sense of smell. Moreover, the last contact of wine with the
mucous membrane of the pharynx and of the base of the tongue leaves a lasting
impression of taste, and when this sensation is disagreeable it is designated under the
collective name of 'after-taste.'
"Good and bad wine judged by the senses. -- If, then, a wine possesses perfect
clearness and freshness of colour, if it has an agreeable odour, if the combined effect
of the acid, sweet, and astringent tastes is gratifying to the anterior part of the mouth
by a fusion, seeming to form a unique taste like many notes in a complete harmony; if
to this harmonious impression the back part of the mouth adds a feeling of glow and
vinous richness, without alcohol being noticed; and if, at last, the act of swallowing
crowns the whole with a natural bouquet, not followed by any 'after-taste,' we may
pronounce the wine to be good as judged by the senses. But, on the other hand, the wine
is unsatisfactory if it fail in any of these points. It will be inferior in proportion as
the acids, sugar, and the salts become individually perceived by the tip of the tongue.
Again, it is imperfect when the chilliness, flatness, the essential oils, the taste of
earth and of cask, and above all, an excess of froe spirit, are manifestly noticed at the
base of that organ. And lastly, it is defective just as the 'arrire bouquet' is less
pleasant, and the 'after-taste' more disagreeably prolonged.
"The difficulty of judging by tastes. -- In this unfolding of the process of wine-tasting
I have endeavoured to be clear, and yet I feel I have not been sufficiently so. It will be
impossible to judge by tastes until science has laid down signs or words
representative of their quality, of their stamp, or of their harmonious relations. The
science of tastes has yet to be founded. Till then, chefs de cuisine and the clever
caterers for banquets will remain isolated geniuses or empirics; while, as regards
wine-tasters and gastronomists, they approve or they criticise, but they do not
establish any rules. It would be a curious collection that would comprise all the
expressions used by wine-tasters, wine-merchants, commercial travellers,
amateurs (by far, indeed, the most numerous class), to express the feelings they
experience in tasting wines. I know an English traveller who only liked a wine when it
caused a 'peacock's tail in the mouth'; and everybody knows the expression of
the Auvergnian drinking a glass of generous old wine - 'It's a yard of velvet going down
the throat.'
"The physiological effect of wines. -- The inhabitants of a beer-drinking or
spirit-drinking country will never possess the vivacity of wit and the
light-heartedness of those who live in a wine-producing land. It is not by any means
the alcohol in itself which constitutes the worth and goodness of wine, for beer may
contain as much, and spirits certainly contain more. To be more or less spirituous
does not constitute good wine. All natural wine is good, whether it be strong or weak in
spirit, if it keeps its organic life. It is good, too, if it reveals itself by a fresh odour,
by a union of all its elements in a taste harmonious to the palate, by being easily
digested, and by causing greater activity of body and mind, and a sensible augmentation
of muscular force. Be the taste of the wine fresh, sharp, or delicate; be it soft,
unctuous, or rich; be it acid or strong, the wine is good if it supports and increases
the forces of body and mind, without wearing out the digestive Organs.
"Wine is good relatively and not absolutely. We ought to have before everything good
common wines. -- A wine is good according to the use to which we put it. Even an
excellent liqueur or dessert vine is undesirable and out of place for ordinary drinking
purposes or for nourishment. We must distinguish between wines for ordinary use,
those for side dishes (entremets), and those for dessert. And these again should be
differentiated into wines for small, medium, or large glasses, relatively, proportional
to the quantity which we can or ought to drink. A good cake is always good if we only eat
a little at a time, and seldom take it; but bread is infinitely better and preferred by
everybody to eating cake always. It is vastly more important to have good ordinary
wines than to have good vins d'entremets or good liqueur wines. And, indeed, this very
matter affects the total consumption within and out of France, and the interests of
producer and consumer, as well as the interests of public hygiene. Good ordinary
wine, alimentary wine - for wine is a real and excellent food -- by no means a wine
strong in spirit, nor is it a wine of great age; but it is a wine of fine cepage, not going
beyond 10 per cent. of spirit, or even 6 per cent."
UNIFORMITY IN AUSTRALIAN WINES.
This is a subject the importance of which cannot be over estimated. And it is one
markedly calling for consideration, as there have been, and still are, grounds for
complaint in this direction. It will be advisable, therefore, to look well into
the question, because it will amply repay the trouble bestowed upon it. First of all,
then, let us refer to the remarks of Mr. Francois de Castella, the author of the
Handbook on Viticulture for Victoria. He points out that in each district there will
be one class of wine which will surpass all others in excellence, and that this is the
type which the grower should produce. All the vine-growers in any one district
should endeavour to make their wines of the type specially adapted for that
particular district; and of course the type will vary in different districts. In this
way, and only in this way, will it be possible for the public to obtain an unvarying
article.
At the present time there are in each district a number of wines possessing
various names, such as Hermitage, Shiraz, Carbenet, Burgundy, Chasselas,
Riesling, Tokay, &c., but these names actually mean nothing. Each district should
produce a different type of wine. A Riesling from the Yarra and a Riesling from the
Murray are as distinct as Hock and Sherry. Mr. de Castella further advises that
each vine-grower should join the Vine-Growers' Association in his locality. In this
way the members of each district can agree amongst themselves to produce one
class of wine, or at most two -- say one white and one red. Instead of the same
names being applied to entirely different wines, the nine will come to be known by
the name of the district in which it is produced. One will then be able to have some
idea of the contents of a bottle, from the label upon it. At present the name on
the bottle is no indication whatever of the wine within; indeed, the same name is
on the outside of many totally distinct wines. This change must assuredly come,
and the sooner it does the better for Australian wines.
Mr. Pownall, in the course of his evidence before the Royal Commission on
Vegetable Products in Victoria, also drew attention to this same want of
uniformity. He believed that each vineyard ought to aim at making a standard
quality of wine, so that wine-merchants might know what to expect from that
vineyard. The wines throughout Australia should likewise, as far as possible, bear
uniform names. He stated that he had met wines in various vineyards grown from
the same grape, and called by different names; and though this might seem a
trivial matter, yet it led to endless confusion. Moreover, it should not be
permitted to continue, especially as it could be so easily rectified.
It must be said, however, that at the Great Western district, in Victoria, a start
has been made in the right direction. A report on the vineyards of that locality
referred to the gratifying fact that a marked tendency existed towards the
adoption of a rational nomenclature of wines. Many of the leading growers were
confining themselves to one red and one white wine. Some of them called their
wine by the name of the vineyard, adding the words Hock, Chablis, Claret, &c.
after them. This is unquestionably so far an improvement, and it is to be hoped
that before long the wine will be known by the name of the vineyard or district,
and by nothing else.
Mr. James Smith has also strongly insisted upon the supreme importance of this
uniformity, especially as regards the quality of the wine. And this is perfectly
true. The quality of any particular wine is solely dependent upon the season, but
the produce of any given vineyard should surely possess, as he remarks, a
distinctive cachet, by which the palate is enabled to recognise it. For instance, an
expert would not fail to distinguish between a Ch‰teau Margaux and a Chateau
Lafitte, nor between a Chateau Latour and a Haut Brion. Notwithstanding the
different vintages, there is always a uniformity and continuity of flavour
maintained through all these great growths. But in the case of our
Australian wines there is a lamentable difference. Wines of the same denomination
and from the same grower differ so materially one year from those bearing a
similar name, and coming from the same cellar, in another, that it is difficult to
believe they are the same. As Mr. Smith justly observes, this is an unpardonable
defect in the estimation of connoisseurs; more especially such as attach
themselves to a particular kind of wine, and naturally drink it by preference.
Constancy of type should be unremittingly aimed at by the vigneron. And this can
only be possible by continuous attention to each individual factor concerned in
vine-growing and wine-making.
THE FUTURE SUCCESS OF THE AUSTRALIAN WINE INDUSTRY --
AND UPON WHAT IT DEPENDS.
Figures help us considerably more than words in enforcing a proper idea of the
magnitude to which the Australian wine industry should develop. It will be
appropriate, therefore, to preface this portion by bringing forward a few
speculative data. In an earlier part of this chapter it was stated that the city of
Paris alone requires nearly 300,000 gallons of wine daily, and that this single city
would consume in 12 days all the wine which the whole of Australia takes 12
months to make. The population of Paris is nearly two and a half millions, while
that of Australia is three millions odd. By considering these together it will be
seen that the wine which it takes over three million people all the year to make,
lasts another two and a half million people only 12 days.
Now, the total annual wine yield of Australia, including both that used here and
that which is exported, is only worth about 800,000 l. It follows from the
foregoing, then, that Paris will in 12 days consume about 800,000 l. worth of
wine, and for the whole year the Parisian figures for wine consumption will reach
to something like 20,000,000 l. Let us suppose that Australia were only a
wine-drinking community, as her climate unceasingly calls for. It would be fair to
assume that her yearly wine bill would be in accordance with the following rule of
proportion. If Paris with her two and a half millions annually consumes wine to the
amount of 20,000,000 l., then Australia with her three millions odd would surely
require for her own use at least 20,000,000 l. worth year by year. And when it is
remembered in addition that the export trade should be enormously in excess of
any local requirements, it will readily be see what a magnificent future only awaits
its calling into being.
We cannot hope that our Australian wines will take a high place amongst those of
the world as long as they are not in general use by our own people. There can be
no keener reproach than to have it said: "Why, even the Australians themselves
do not drink their own wines." And this is regrettedly the fact. It is necessary,
therefore, that first of all our people should take a very deep interest in all the
details connected with vine-growing and wine-making, and thus give some
encouragement to those who are doing their best to establish what will ultimately
become Australia's brightest glory. And it will be a good thing for this land when a
knowledge of every point in the growing of the grape, and every step in the making
of the wine, becomes part and parcel of our daily life. The very hoardings of our
streets are covered with advertisements of countless brands of whisky, and of
numberless varieties of ale. But those setting forth the virtues of our wines are
conspicuous by their absence. It would seem that Australia, where our own wine
should be the national beverage, is almost the last country in which to find it.
It may be asked, what are the reasons which lead to this disregard of the virtues
possessed by our own wines? The reply to this question is not an easy
matter, but I shall endeavour to answer it to the best of my ability. The probability
is, if a dozen people were asked, at random, why Australian wine is so little used in
Australia, that at least that number of different explanations would be
forthcoming. The truth, however, is more likely to be found in a combination of
reasons, rather than from any one single cause. These are obviously worth
considering, from the very fact that the knowing of what they consist is of the
first importance in rectifying them.
I shall begin, then, by saving that the label on the bottle has much to answer for,
in that it is misleading. It does not give any idea of what is to be found inside. Thus
the word Riesling, on one bottle, may be attached to a wine grown on the Hunter,
in New South Wales, and on another to a wine from the Yarra, in Victoria. It is true
that the wine from these two places may be grown from the same "cepage." But
while the river Yarra wine will contain perhaps 11 per cent. of alcohol, that from
the Hunter River will have quite 20 per cent. - so much does an increase in the
warmth of the climate increase the alcoholic strength of the wine.
And while we are on the subject of labels, I must certainly take exception to the
unattractive character of those employed on the bottles of our Australian wines.
There is no reason whatever why a little consideration should not be paid to the
artistic sense in this respect. Our wine merchants, it would appear, fail to
understand the selling power which belongs to the "get-up" of the label on a wine
bottle. I feel sure this attractiveness has a great deal to do with the success of
many products, notably in the case of the American preserved fruits. Some of
these are labelled in a manner which is creditable in the highest degree -- and
what is more, from a practical point, it is no unimportant factor in their huge sale.
Then again, there is that want of uniformity which Mr. James Smith has so ably
descanted upon, and to which I have already referred. It is bad enough to have a
wine labelled Riesling, or whatever it may be, from one place differing entirely
from a wine of the same name which comes from some other locality. But it is a
far more serious defect when the wine of any particular place one year differs
entirely from the same wine coming from the same locality at another. For the
same variety of wine, of the same vineyard, thus to vary, year by year, is simply
unpardonable. This must not be allowed to continue, for while it exists Australian
nines will always be subject to reproach -- a reproach, indeed, which cannot be
explained away.
And while dealing with these shortcomings I propose to speak of another matter,
which is by no means unimportant. I refer to the size of the bottle. It has
frequently happened that visitors to Australia hare said to me, "I should very
much like -- indeed, I am anxious -- to try your Australian wines; but
unfortunately I cannot drink a whole bottle at table, and I am unable to obtain
less." Now, this is undoubtedly a grievance, and should be overcome in some way;
either by putting up a portion of our wines in smaller bottles, or else by making
some arrangement so that a smaller quantity may be obtained. Since these lines
were written, however, it is very pleasing to record the fact that one enterprising
firm in Sydney has taken a highly commendable step in this very direction; and
already smaller bottles of Australian wine may be obtained for the low prices of
6d. and 9d.
Up to this point I have made no remarks with regard to the knowledge of wine
possessed by the majority of Australians, and yet in many respects it is the most
important of all. They are not called upon to pronounce an opinion upon a
wine, such as would be looked for from an expert. But I do think it is very desirable
that they should know, at least, the kind of wine that is suitable for Australian
use. Once this is accomplished, and it is by no means difficult to learn, a great
deal will have been achieved. It is quite a mistake to imagine that the value of a
wine increases with its strength, and that the stronger a wine is, the more
valuable it becomes. Even in Europe itself strong wines are going out of fashion,
and lighter ones are taking their place. People much prefer a light wine, of which
they can take a fair amount and quench their thirst, in preference to a strong
wine of the port or sherry type, of which they can only take a small wineglassful.
But in Australia, the very place where one would expect a demand for all lighter
wines, the taste for strong wines as the rule. This is another striking example of
the same antagonism to climatic environment which is found all through our food
habits. A light wine is the wine above all others which should be most sought after.
What Australia requires as a national beverage is a wine of low alcoholic strength.
It should be so cheap as to come within the easy every-day reach of all classes.
And finally, it should take the place of all other liquids, since it is essentially
wholesome, hygienic, restorative, and cheering.
The reputation of Australian wines in the English market has hitherto been
damaged to a considerable extent by the practices which have been followed on
the part of some of the large buyers. But before referring to these proceedings,
to which Mr. Hans Irvine, of the Great Western Vineyard, in Victoria, has so
properly and powerfully drawn attention, it must be distinctly understood that any
subsequent remarks do not apply to all the London wine-merchants. On the
contrary, there are many whose characters are irreproachable, and whose
integrity is above suspicion. By clearing the ground in this way one is
enabled to protest against the treatment which Australian wine receives in
London, without levelling charges against estimable men, who command respect,
and who deserve the gratitude of all Australians for their fair dealings.
Well then, most of our wines purchased by English buyers have been those of
full-bodied, crude, and coarse young wines, containing a great amount of alcohol.
Two reasons have been assigned for this proceeding; the first being that
Australian wines would not bear the voyage unless they were sufficiently strong;
and the second, that in England the demand was more particularly for such a class
of wine. But many of these firms are utterly ignorant of any special knowledge as
to treating the finer and more delicate wines. It has suited these buyers to deal
only with the stronger wines, as they are the more secured from any loss or
trouble. For the fact is, these wines, while being of a greater alcoholic strength,
are really of most excellent character and quality. And besides this, they release
certain customers, whose idea of a good wine - even at the present time - is a
wine of great body and strength, and not so much one with that delicacy of
character and bouquet which the finer wines possess.
Some of the merchants, having but little bother with the heavier wines, have
encouraged their sale to as great an extent as possible. From this it follows that
those who prefer and habitually drink a better class of wine have never had the
opportunity of becoming acquainted with the magnificent wines which Australia
can supply. As Mr. Irvine tells us, the higher types of fine, light, delicate, dry
wines, with a richness of bouquet, such as most districts in Australia are capable
of producing, are the kinds of wine we must look forward to for establishing a
name and fame for our produce. It is not too much to assert that before
very long Australia will be able to supply wines whose quality will rival the choicest
vintages of the most famous vineyards of Europe. Even as it is, the delicacy of
bouquet and excellent characters of many of the Australian red and white wines
have fairly astonished connoisseurs on being submitted to them.
It seems a thousand pities, then, that such misconception should exist with regard
to our wines. And quite undeservedly so, for as a matter of fact these lighter
wines are most unfairly neglected. They simply require to be properly fined and
carefully attended to. The casks in which they are shipped should be thoroughly
cleansed and treated before being filled, in order to take out any taint of spirits
they may contain; or any excess of tannin, which is always present in Dew wood. If
these different matters be looked to they will improve to a wonderful extent on
the voyage, and after being allowed a week or fortnight's rest on arrival, they will
be found in a highly satisfactory condition. After this time these delicate wines of
a low alcoholic strength require to be duly cared for. But they are worth a little
extra attention, for it is absolutely certain that through them, and through them
alone, will our Australian wines be accorded the merit and the appreciation which
they so undoubtedly deserve.
It must not be imagined, however, that the foregoing is the only handicap which
Australian wine has to carry. In other cases there are many reprehensible
proceedings adopted, which irretrievably injure the reputation of our wines in the
English market. Some of the inferior wines are shipped home and "restored," by
blending them with full, heavy, rich wines from warmer districts. When "clothed"
in this way, their imperfections are for a time hidden, but the bad soon
contaminates the whole. It is true that a good, sound, and well-made wine
improves with age. But with these "restored" and "clothed" wines the
reverse happens, and they become worse and worse by keeping.
Then again, many of the widely advertised Australian wines in the old country are
sold too young; and unfortunately these young wines constitute the bulk of the
trade done with England. They are bottled when too green and crude, and have not
been given a sufficient time in cask to develop into high-class wines. They must be
allowed to acquire a proper amount of cask ripeness, and if they were stored and
attended to for twelve months before being bottled they would vastly improve. In
some cases, also, wines are shipped from Australia before they are twelve
months old, and as they are usually fined, bottled, and sold as soon as possible
after arrival, it has actually happened that the British public have repeatedly
drunk wines that are hardly one year old. Indeed, the wines are frequently bottled
when in a state of fermentation, consequently secondary fermentation goes on in
the bottle, and the bottles are often shattered by an explosion. And more than
this, they are often badly blended; they do not receive sufficient care and
attention; and they are not uncommonly in the hands of a few men whose sole
object is to make money.
There is still something further which is greatly prejudicial to the fair name of
Australian wine, and it is this: Many of the wine merchants hold very small stocks,
so that any one supply soon runs out and is no longer obtainable. As a result it is
urged against the wines that they are not constant, and that it is impossible to
procure the same wine twice running. With larger stocks, too, there would be
some certainty that the wine was matured, as for example with a merchant
holding a three years' supply. In this case, also, the consumer would be
enabled to obtain a continued supply of any particular wine to which he might have
become attached.
My own belief, however, is that the most powerful impetus to our wine industry will
arise from the Australians themselves taking an interest in all that concerns this
great source of health, wealth, and employment. I have said so before, and take
this opportunity of saying so again. Let our people take an active interest in every
detail connected with the growing of the grape, and with the making of the wine!
Let a light, wholesome wine, also, enter into the daily dietary of the whole people!
For the national drink for Australian use is unquestionably a wine of low alcoholic
strength; a wine of a sufficient age to be free from any reproach of newness; and
a wine possessing those qualities which render it wholesome, beneficial, hygienic,
cheering, and restorative.
There are two other matters which require to be noticed before leaping the whole
subject of Australian wine. The first of these is a reference to the establishment
of Viticultural Colleges, and it is one of very great importance, because it has
much to do with the development of the wine industry. Now, I am not one of those
who look to the State for everything, but it seems to me that if you recognise the
necessity of State education, you must at least equally recognise the necessity of
affording the youthful population of Australia the opportunity of learning that
which must eventually develop into the one distinctive industry of this land. France
at the present day, even with her unrivalled reputation as the wine-growing
country of the world, avails herself of the advantages of Viticultural Colleges.
Italy, also, by means of their help is making strides in a manner actually bordering
on the miraculous. If these countries, then, in which vine-growing and winemaking
have been carried on for centuries find Viticultural Colleges indispensable,
how much more must a young country, with its wine industry quite undeveloped,
need them!
It must with confidence be said, therefore, that Australia cannot do without these
Viticultural Colleges. Something has already been done by the establishment of
Agricultural Colleges, and this is most commendable. But what I believe is this,
that a wine-grower must be a wine-grower and nothing else. To know everything
connected with the growth of the grape and cellar management thoroughly is quite
enough for any ordinary man to attempt to master. Therefore viticulture must
either be made a distinctly separate course at the Agricultural Colleges; or, what
if better still, Viticultural Colleges must be established for the purpose alone.
At Montpellier, in France, the course of viticultural education is elaborately
comprehensive, and includes the study of the anatomy of the vine, its flowers,
leaves, seeds, &c. The pupils become thoroughly acquainted with every variety of
wine in practical form; they see it grow, learn the art of pruning, and of
everything pertaining to the growth of the vine. They also master all the details
connected with grafting, the laying out of vineyards, the diseases to which the
vine is liable, and the remedies which are most effectual. And, in addition, there is
minute instruction in every step in cellar management and the after care and
treatment of the wine itself, from the start to the finish. In this way the subject
is studied from a thoroughly scientific standpoint, with a result that influences
for good the whole of French viticulture.
But if the benefits derived from the establishment of Viticultural Colleges in
France are thus remarkable, those which have followed their introduction into Italy
are nothing less than wonderful. The School of Viticulture at Conegliano
has been the means of increasing the wine production of Italy to an incredible
extent. In 1870 Italy exported only 4,000,000 gallons of wine; yet in 1890, in the
short space of twenty years, this had risen to 88,000,000 gallons. This school
has taught the people to make good wine; it has induced people who had never
dreamt of it to plant vineyards; it hag led people to plant them properly, since
they were shown the way on a rational principle; and lastly, they have thus learnt
how to make wine on a scientific basis. The course of study there is extremely
severe, and as a result all those who receive diplomas from it thoroughly
understand the cultivation of the vine and the management of the cellar. This
School of Viticulture has been such a phenomenal success that other provinces of
Italy brought pressure upon the Government. As a consequence therefrom,
secondary schools have been established at many places, notably Gioia del Colle,
Pozzuolo, Tmola, Avellino, Alda, Catania, &c.
In conclusion, there is that other most important matter to which I should like to
draw attention. It is to advocate the establishment of an Australian Wine-Growers'
Association on a federal basis. The advantage resulting from the formation of a
strong Association, with a numerically powerful membership roll, would be very
great. Such an organization would be well able to conduct a weekly paper of its
own, with contributors from all the different colonies. There would be no dearth of
literary material, for the whole subject is one teeming with interest. Even now a
substantial beginning has been made, and The Australian Vigneron and
Fruit-Growers Journal is well deserving of success, and is already doing good
work in this very direction. And besides the foregoing, an Intercolonial
Wine-Growers' Congress should meet annually at the different Australian
metropolitan centres (Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Brisbane, &c.), in
rotation, where there would be the opportunity of discussing theoretical
questions, and of tasting practical results. In all these many ways public interest
in the Australian wine industry would be continually sustained; and, rising from its
unfairly neglected position, it would speedily attain to that pride of place which is
manifestly its destiny.
PART II. AUSTRALIAN COOKERY RECIPES AND ACCESSORY KITCHEN INFORMATION.
MRS. H. WICKEN.
Diplome'e of the National Training School for Cookery, London; Lecturer on Cookery to the Technical College, Sydney.
Furnishing the kitchen is often looked upon as quite of secondary importance; but,
instead of being last and least, it ought to be first and foremost, for a cook
cannot be expected to send up a good dinner without proper utensils, any more
than a carpenter can turn out a piece of furniture without proper tools. It is no
doubt a great mistake to have many things in use, for a bad servant will have
every one dirty before she begins to wash up, and a good servant will have a lot of
work in keeping them clean and in good order. There are a few utensils, not at all
expensive, which are a great aid to the cook and a saving of time too, and yet
from some cause or other are seldom found in an ordinary kitchen. Before
glancing at these we might consider what is the best covering for the floor. There
is no doubt that deal boards well scrubbed look nicer than anything else, but to
keep them spotless involves a lot of labour, and as this is not always to be had,
perhaps the wisest plan is to cover it with oilcloth or linoleum; a good medium
quality can be bought for 3s. 3d. a square yard, and if properly laid will last for
years. By the way, it should not be washed, but only rubbed with a damp cloth first
and then with a piece of flannel dipped in oil soda and scrubbing will ruin it very
quickly. If the cupboard accommodation is scanty the dresser should be bought
with cupboards underneath; in this case it will cost about £3, but if without
cupboards £1 10s. A deal table is the best, and this must be kept white with
constant scrubbing; while the cookery is going on a piece of oil baize might be laid
over it. Pearson's carbolic sand soap will remove any grease spots very quickly;
the paste board and rolling pin can also be kept white in the same way. It
will be found an advantage to have two or three French or butchers' knives for
cooking purposes, instead of using the dinner knives. These can be bought from
1s. 6d. each; they are stronger and take a better edge than ordinary knives.
Wooden and iron spoons will be found cheaper and better than using table spoons
as these latter are soon ruined if used for stirring; cookery spoons cost about 3d.
each; two of each would be found sufficient. A conical strainer is more convenient
and useful than the round ones so generally used. For mixing bowls the agate iron
are the best; they are a little more expensive in the first place than the yellow
earthenware, but they are unbreakable, and therefore cheaper in the end; they
cost about 4s. 6d. each. A small sausage machine is very necessary, for by means
of this useful contrivance many scraps of meat and bread can be utilized; the
cost of one is 10s. 6d. A pestle and mortar, too, will be found of great use in
making up odds and ends into dainty tit-bits; these, too, cost about 10s. 6d. Wire
and hair sieves are invaluable for preparing soups and many other dishes; sieves
with a wooden rim will be found the most durable; they cost 2s. 6d. Each. Agate
iron saucepans are light and durable and very easy to keep clean; they are much
better than the blue enamelled ware, as they do not burn so readily or chip so
soon. Frying pans are nice, too, of the same ware. A set each of wire and metal
dish-covers must not be forgotten; the latter should be of plain blocked tin, and
as the fluted ones soon get shabby, these should be well washed inside and out
with scouring soap and polished with Goddard's plate powder. A French fryer is
invaluable; it will cost 7s. 6d. Three or four pounds of dripping clarified should be
put at first; this will require straining. After being used once or twice, the fryer
should then be washed out with soda water, well dried, and the fat put
back; it can be renewed from time to time with some fresh fat, and it will keep
good for weeks. When it looks very dark throw it away and start with a fresh lot
of fat; it can be used for fish, rissoles, fritters, &c., and one can never tell that
anything has been fried in it before, if it attains the right heat before the friture
is put in. It should be between boiling water heat (212¡) and boiling fat (600¡), 385¡
being exactly right, and can be tested by dropping in a small piece of bred. If it
browns instantly it is ready; whatever is put into it will fry in two or three
minutes. Food cooked in this way will not be so greasy and indigestible as it often
is if cooked in a frying pan.
And now, last and most important of all, the stove; for although we may do
without a great many things which are nice and useful to have, without a stove it
is impossible to cook well. It may be for gas, wood, or coal, but it must act well.
Gas stoves are extremely simple, clean, and easy to use, there are no flues to get
choked, and in towns where gas is cheap it is no doubt the easiest and pleasantest
heat to use. To keep them clean and sweet they should be well washed inside and
out with soda and water at least once a week and polished with a little Electric
black lead. The flues of wood and coal stoves should be thoroughly cleansed out
once a week, and the oven cleansed with soap and soda; this is very necessary
work, for if the ovens are not clean whatever is cooked in them will be spoilt. A
little thoughtful care in these matters will often prevent much trouble when
cooking. Let a housekeeper, therefore, thoroughly master her stove first, and
understand the flues and dampers, for only in this way will she be able to
successfully cook the dishes she has skilfully prepared. Cleanliness and care in
respect of the stove and kitchen utensils generally are as necessary to success
as knowing the right materials to use and how to put them together, and
every one who can cook a dinner should also know how to clean and keep in good
order the stove and all culinary utensils. Order and neatness must reign in the
kitchen as well as in the drawing-room, and it will help greatly to bring about this
desirable state of affairs if all utensils are cleansed and put away immediately
they are finished with, for it is much easier to wash them then than if left dirty
for some time. As soon as the contents of a saucepan have been dished, fill it
with cold water, add a lump of soda, and stand it on the stove till hot; it can then
be washed up in a few minutes. Plates and dishes should at once be put into a bowl
of hot or cold water; treat spoons and forks in the same way. Knives, wipe at
once, and clean as soon as possible. A damp cloth rubbed with Monkey soap will do
wonders in removing stains and dust; these, if left for a time, are hard to get off,
and the kitchen, which ought to be bright and cheerful, soon has a greasy, dirty
look.
Some of us can call to mind delightful old kitchens in country houses, which were a
pleasure and a joy to both mistress and maids, where bright copper stewpans
reflected the blazing fire on all sides, and metal covers shone like mirrors; while
as for "eating off the floor," one might certainly do it if so inclined, without the
"peck of dirt" at once.
How cosy and delightful everything seems in a kitchen like this, and what visions
can we not see of home-made bread and cakes, well-cooked joints, succulent
vegetables, delicious puddings, dainty dishes of all kinds concocted with skilful
fingers! And why should not these visions turn into substantial realities? They will
do so if women will consider it a pleasure, instead of a degradation, to "look well to
the ways of her household," and establish a system of order and neatness
from cellar to garret. When this happy time comes she will be "emancipated" from
many cares and have more leisure to cultivate her intellect than she has now.
Surely "a study which helps" to make cheerful homes and healthy, well-conducted,
"prosperous citizens is worth at least a trial."
"An ice chest!" someone exclaims. "I should like to know how I am to get that."
Well, very easily indeed, if there is a will to have one, for then the way is plain. A
refrigerator years ago was perhaps only obtainable by the wealthy, and regarded
rightly by others as a not-to-be-thought-of-luxury; but, thanks to the rapid
development of scientific knowledge, both ice and refrigerators are now within the
means of nearly all. The Americans in this led the way, and those in the Central
States would no more dream of being without ice during the hot season, than they
would of failure to take daily supplies of bread and milk. In almost every home
through bright and sunny Australia we find a piano and a sewing machine, and yet
either of these costs far more than an ice chest, and perhaps as much to keep in
repair as the ice to fill it. Looking at it from many points of view, it ought to be
considered an indispensable article of furniture, and it has this great advantage
over many "household gods," that the first expense is the last; for it never gets
out of order, and lasts a lifetime; and this cannot be said of many other pieces of
furniture, which perhaps cost more and yet are not so useful. In such a warm
climate as this, where for six months in the year our one desire is to keep cool, it
must certainly be worth while to secure a simple and inexpensive article which will
help us to attain this object. Looking at the matter from the Domestic Economy
point of view, we shall certainly decide at once in favour of the purchase.
Housekeepers, both young and experienced, know how much food has to be thrown
away because it will not keep sweet for even a few hours in the hot season.
All this waste is at an end if there is ice about, as it will keep perishable food cool
and pleasant and ready for a second meal. Many odds and ends of vegetables, fish,
and meat can be turned into a dainty salad with the ice chest which must have
been thrown away without it. Thus the expense, not only of the ice, but also of the
chest, is soon saved, to say nothing of the pleasure and enjoyment of the said
salad, which one would so infinitely rather have had than the chops and steaks so
universally served. Delicious little breakfast dishes can be concocted over night
from the remains of fish and meat served at tea and put down into the ice all
night. These are cooked in a few minutes in the morning, and form such a pleasant
change to the standing dish of eggs and bacon; and how proud a good
house-keeper will feel when her little dishes are enjoyed, and she knows that they
have cost nothing! -- for the food would not have kept, and must therefore have
been thrown away if she had not possessed an ice chest. This is only one instance
of what may be accomplished, but in the daily routine of work many more will be
found. Think, for a moment, of the state of the butter without ice on a hot day.
Who does not dread the sight of the liquid or greasy fat usually seen in the
butter-dish, and what a remote chance there is of enjoying a slice of bread and
butter with bread as hard and dry as a brickbat, and butter running to oil? Put
both into a refrigerator and note the difference. Look at it, also, from the hygenic
standpoint. Most people, save the very strong and robust, lose their appetite
during the hot season, and therefore feel languid and weak. Give them dry bread
and liquid butter, and they can't touch a morsel; but with fresh bread, hard butter,
and some dainty tit-bit, kept in the ice also, placed before them, a good meal is
often enjoyed. Again, in cases of illness ice becomes at once a necessity;
and if it is at hand in the house and ready for use much time and trouble will be
saved, and suffering too, as the poor invalid waits with what patience he can for
the relief which is so often brought with ice.
And now we come to the practical question of how we are to get it, and how to
keep it. There are several companies who undertake to deliver a daily supply of ice
in town and country at a very moderate price, about sixpence a block of 10 lbs.;
but when there is a larger demand for it, it will very soon be supplied at even a
cheaper rate. There is a very simple little American invention which makes ice
very quickly. It is not by any means expensive, about 21. 2s. 0d., and is invaluable
in country districts away from the railway. Then for a refrigerator there are
several very simple chests which require only a small quantity of ice to keep them
charged. The smallest and cheapest is the Baldwin, costing from 30s., and another
is the Iceberg, which acts splendidly. Unlike other machines, which are liable from
their complicated structure to get out of order, these are so simple that they
require no repairs, but only strict cleanliness to keep them in good order. They
should be well washed out with soap and soda at least once a week, and care taken
that no little bits of food are left in when the plate containing the main part is
removed, for these morsels will cause an unpleasant smell and quickly taint
anything that may be put in afterwards. It is better not to break the ice up, but to
put the whole block in the refrigerator, and when once it is in to close the lid
securely and keep it closed. It is a good plan to put a piece of newspaper over the
block, as that forces the cold air down into the lower chamber. The larger blocks
will be found almost as cheap as the small ones, as if carefully used they last
much longer. No doubt, as the desire for ice increases, smaller blocks, costing
perhaps 2d., or 3d., will be made, or the present prices reduced to that
figure. This, to a great extent, is in the hands of the consumers, for as soon as
there is a more spirited demand some energetic firm will arise and supply the
want, and we shall have, not only cheaper ice, but cheaper ice-chests too. Dr.
Muskett has pointed out some of the advantages of ice in his work on The Health
and Diet of Children in Australia, as will be seen from the following paragraph:
--
"In our semi-tropical climate a dislike is often taken to butter, when it is
presented at breakfast in the form of semi-liquid grease. It would require a person
with the stomach of an ostrich to digest, to say nothing of relish, such an
oleaginous composition during our summer months. But if this necessary and
all-important article of diet can be presented in an appetising form, what a
desirable result is achieved! The mass of the people -- I am not referring to those
who are well endowed with wordly gifts -- are apt to look upon the Ice Chest as a
luxury which is altogether beyond their means. But I am firmly persuaded that if
the price of ice were brought down to one halfpenny per pound, and that if a
company were formed to deliver such a small quantity as six pounds per day, or
every second day, it would be a great boon, and, moreover, a wonderfully
profitable speculation. A very small and suitable Ice Chest could be constructed
solely to preserve the butter in a congealed and therefore palatable state, both to
children and to adults. The former would take it with great avidity, and the benefit
to health resulting therefrom would be incalculable. Even in some of the
better-class houses Ice is looked upon too much as a luxury, and not as it should
be, a necessity; indeed, the money saved from gas during the summer months
might well be expended on Ice."
The stock pot is indispensable to good cooking, and although many soups and
sauces can be made with water as a foundation, nearly all of them are improved
by using stock, and no cook who desires to achieve good results should be without
a basin of stock when she commences operations in the morning. There are
saucepans now called digesters, which are most useful as stock pots, but any
good-sized saucepan or boiler will do very well indeed. This should be put on fresh
every morning with everything the larder contains that is suitable -- such, for
instance, as the bones of fresh or cooked meat, poultry, or rabbits. Never put in
fat, as this can be rendered down for pastry and frying, and only makes the stock
greasy; always cover the bones with cold water, but regulate the quantity by the
material used. Put in cold water with a teaspoonful of salt, and when it boils up,
skim well; when skimming, take an iron spoon and a basin of water, and dip the
spoon in the water each time the scum is removed; then put in the peppercorns
and vegetables. In very hot weather put peppercorns and a fagot of herbs only, as
the vegetables cause the stock to turn sour very soon; peppercorns should always
be used, as they impart a much pleasanter flavour to soup than pepper. A fagot
of herbs is made with a bay or peach leaf, a sprig each of parsley, thyme, and
marjoram tied together with a piece of cotton. These herbs can be grown so easily
if one has a small garden, or even in a box, with very little care; they impart such
a pleasant flavour to soups and gravies. Leeks cut up with the green tops and put
into the stock pot instead of onions are very good. Part of the onion skin
left on makes a good colour, but it can be coloured by burning half a teaspoonful
of sugar in an old spoon, or by a few drops of caramel -- the recipe for which is
given elsewhere. All fresh meat and bones should be carefully trimmed and wiped
with a warm damp cloth before putting into the pot; when the stock has boiled,
stand the saucepan at the back of the stove and simmer slowly for at least five
or six hours. If strong stock is desired, leave the lid off the saucepan for the last
hour; the water will then evaporate and make the stock richer. The stock should
be strained through a hair sieve or a colander, and should stand in a cool place till
the next day. If it has been carefully made it will be in a jelly; the fat can very
easily be removed with a spoon. It should finally be wiped with a damp cloth.
Removing the fat thoroughly is a most important item, for greasy soups and
sauces are most indigestible and unwholesome. If the stock has to be used at
once, remove the fat first with a spoon, and then pass pieces of this paper lightly
across the surface; these will absorb the fat. A small piece of charcoal laid on top
of the stock will prevent it turning sour in the hot weather. With this basin of
stock to work on, many dainty tit-bits are possible which could not be made
without it. How often has the cookery book been searched for "something nice"
and laid down with a sigh when half a pint of gravy has been found necessary to
concoct the desired dainty! But with a basin of stock on hand, all these things are
procurable, and it certainly does not take more than ten minutes to break up the
bones, skim the pot, and strain it, and last of all it costs nothing. In cases of
sudden emergency, when stock is wanted and is not to be had, the recipe for Quick
Beef Tea answers very well, using one quart of water instead of one pint, and by
adding a few vegetables; this is made in five minutes. White soup is looked
upon as quite a high-class soup, but it is just as easy to make as any other kind. A
piece of stewed veal or mutton, or a boiled chicken, gives the stock at once, or
the bones of mutton, veal, or pork alone will form the foundation. Never throw
away the water in which carrots, parsnips, celery, or even cauliflowers have been
boiled. Vegetables contain a great deal of potash, which is a valuable food for the
blood. A great deal of this potash comes out in the water during the process of
cooking; if this liquor is used as a foundation for soup, we utilize this. For this
reason vegetable soups, and stews containing plenty of vegetables, are such a
good diet for anyone suffering from or subject to diseases of the blood and bones.
These simple facts seem to be overlooked; but if Australia is to become in the
future, as we all hope it may, a power in the world second to none, the wives and
mothers of her husbands and sons must understand the necessity of providing
them with a diet which shall make them strong and brave, and root out what now
seems to be the curse of the land -- dyspepsia -- brought on in a great measure
by badly cooked and therefore indigestible food. The remedy for this is in the
hands of the women of Australia, and if they will rise to their position and
importance and do their work with a high and holy motive, they will not find it the
drudgery it is often supposed to be. What does Owen Meredith say? --
"We may live without poetry, music, and art,
We may live without conscience, and live without heart,
We may live without friends, we may live without books,
But civilised man cannot live without cooks.
He may live without books -- what is knowledge but grieving?
He may live without hope -- what is hope but deceiving?
He may live without love -- what is passion but pining?
But where is the man that can live without dining?"
Soup is a much neglected food; there are many excuses made for this -- one says
it is "expensive", another it is "too much trouble" and "quite unnecessary".
When once the principle of the stock pot is understood the first excuse falls
through, for in any ordinary households the stock can be made from bones and
trimmings of meat, and costs nothing. Neither does the excuse of too much
trouble hold good. Some little time must be devoted to cooking, and soup will
almost cook itself while other preparations are going on, and it can be made at any
time and just boiled up when required. As for being unnecessary, that is quite a
mistake. To give the greatest amount of nourishment with the least trouble to the
digestive organs should be the study of every housekeeper, and soup is a valuable
aid in this respect. For weakly and delicate constitutions, for the young and the
aged, there is no better food, and for the busy workers it is invaluable, for
immediately after work the digestive organs are not in a proper state to do hard
work, and little soup prepares the stomach for the more solid food to follow. It is
quite a mistake to suppose that a rich, heavy soup is necessary, and that a large
quantity must be taken. In either case, the effect would be to take away the
appetite, instead of which it is to stimulate and encourage the appetite that the
soup should be given.
Soup is a splendid restorative, and if given to any one suffering from exhaustion
or over fatigue will quickly restore strength, and be found far better than any
stimulant. Soup is often disliked because it is greasy and served lukewarm;
if the directions given in the paragraph on the stock pot for removing the fat be
carried out, it will never be greasy, and if it is boiled up just before serving, it will
be hot. Allow half a pint of soup for each guest, have a warm tureen and hot
plates, and "try the effect".
STOCK FROM BONES (FRESH BONES).
Bones - 3d.
Vegetables - 1d.
Total Cost - 4d.
Beef bones are the best for this stock; break them up very small with a chopper,
put them into a large saucepan and cover well with cold water, add two
teaspoonsful of salt, and when it boils up remove the scum carefully, and put in
one onion, one carrot, half a turnip, a little piece of the outside stalk of celery,
and 1 dozen peppercorns. Boil steadily for six hours, or longer, then strain off
through a colander or sieve, and stand in a cool place till the next day. Carefully
remove the fat by directions given elsewhere, and it is ready for use.
This stock is a good foundation for all soups, gravies, and sauces. In very hot
weather omit all the vegetables.
STOCK FROM BONES (NO. 2)
The bones from all joints of meat, whether roasted or boiled, make excellent
stock. Beef bones are the best, but very good stock can be made from mutton
and veal bones. The bones and trimmings of all kinds of poultry, game, and rabbits
are also excellent, particularly for soups that require a special flavour. To make
this stock successfully care must be taken to remove all pieces that may be
burnt, as these give the stock an unpleasant flavour. The bones must be chopped
very small, and well covered with cold water. When the pot boils put in a
teaspoonful of salt and skim well, then boil steadily for six hours or longer;
strain off and remove the fat, and it is ready for use, but it is much better to let
it stand till the next day before converting it into soup or gravy.
FISH STOCK
Vegetables and Peppercorns - 1d.
Fish for nearly all dishes is better if boned before cooking; it is also economy to do
this, as the bones can then be used for stock for fish soups. These soups,
although not well known here at present, are a valuable food; they are easy to
make, wholesome, and nourishing. After the fillets of fish have been removed,
directions for which are given amongst the fish recipes, take the bones, wash
them well in cold water, and cut away any black substance that may be adhering to
them. Break them up and put into a saucepan with a teaspoonful of salt; when it
boils remove the scum and put in 1 dozen white peppercorns, a fagot of herbs,
one onion, and one carrot; boil steadily for two hours or longer, strain through a
sieve into a basin, and it is ready for use.
POT BOILINGS
Water in which meat of fish has been boiled should never be thrown away, as it
forms an excellent foundation for many soups and sauces which might otherwise
have to be made with water.
If a large quantity of water has been used, the boilings will be poor; therefore,
when the meat has been taken up, leave the pot on the fire and let it boil quickly,
without the lid, for an hour or so, then strain off for use.
The water in which corned beef or pork has been cooked is generally too salt for
soups, but it should be stood away till cold, when a thick cake of fat will be found
on the top. Put this into a basin and pour over it some boiling water; when
it is cold again it can be used for cakes and pastry. It makes an excellent and
wholesome substitute for butter in cooking.
VEAL STOCK
Knuckle of Veal
Peppercorns and Vegetables
Total Cost - 10d.
The butcher should chop the bones very small. Cut the meat across in several
places, lay it in a very clean stock pot, cover well with cold water, and bring to the
boil slowly; put in a dessertspoonful of salt, and skim very carefully; draw away
from the fire, place it where it will boil steadily, put in 2 dozen white peppercorns,
one onion stuck with six cloves, and a fagot of herbs. This is made with a sprig
each of parsley, marjoram, and thyme, tied up with a bay or peach leaf; boil
steadily for six hours, and strain off.
This is the foundation for the best white soups and sauces; it is also a very
nutritious broth for invalids. The meat can be made hot again in about half a pint
of the stock and served with parsley butter sauce. A recipe for this is given with
the sauces.
BEEF STOCK
Leg of Beef - 9d.
Vegetables - 1d.
Total Cost - 10d.
The bone in this meat should be chopped small by the butcher. Remove the marrow
from the bones, and cut the meat into small pieces; put all together into a stock
pot or digester, cover well with cold water, and bring it to the boil; add a
dessertspoonful of salt; this will throw up the scum, which must be carefully
removed. When this has been done put in 2 dozen peppercorns, an onion,
and two carrots, draw away from the fire and let it boil steadily for five or six
hours or longer, then strain off through a colander and stand away in a cool place.
This is the foundation for nearly all good brown soups. The bones boiled again will
make second stock, and the meat does very well for brawn, a recipe for which is
given amongst the meat dishes.
BEEF TEA - NO. 1
1 lb. Gravy Beef
1 pint water
3d.
Remove all fat and skin from the meat and put it twice through a sausage machine
or scrape it into a pulp with a sharp knife, pour over the cold water, and let it
stand for an hour. Pour it into a brown baking jar and put it into a cool oven, and
keep it below boiling point for an hour or longer, according to the heat of the oven.
It should look brown, thick, and rich, when sufficiently cooked. Strain through a
colander, add salt to taste, and it is ready to serve.
QUICK BEEF TEA - NO. 2
1 lb Gravy Beef
1 pint water
3d.
Pass the meat twice through a sausage machine, put it into a saucepan, pour over
the cold water, and stand on the stove; stir constantly until it comes to boiling
point, but do not allow it to boil. As soon as it changes colour from red to brown
strain through a colander, add salt to taste, and it is ready to serve.
RAW BEEF TEA.
1/4 lb Gravy Beef and 1 gill of Water
Scrape the meat to a pulp with a sharp knife, pour over it with water; cover over
and stand away for an hour. Strain off, and it is ready. As this is given to
an invalid in small quantities, very little should be made at a time.
BEEF ESSENCE.
1 lb Gravy Beef - 3d.
Mince the meat very small, put it into a brown baking jar, and cover down with a
closely-fitting lid or with brown paper. Stand in a saucepan of boiling water for one
hour, pour off the essence, add a little salt, and it is ready.
MUTTON BROTH
4 or 5 scrags of Mutton and Shank Bones - 6d
Carefully trim the scrags of mutton, remove the pith from the bones, and wipe
with a damp cloth; break these and the shank bones into very small pieces; put
them into an enamelled saucepan, well covered with cold water; add a teaspoonful
of salt, stand on the stove, and when it boils up remove the scum very carefully.
Add 1 dozen peppercorns, and an onion and carrot, if vegetables are allowed the
patient. Boil steadily for eight or nine hours; the liquor should then be reduced to
one quart. Strain off, and, if possible, let it stand till quite cold; it should then be
in a jelly, and can be made hot as required. When serving this to a convalescent a
spoonful of rice or pearl barley well washed in cold water and boiled in either stock
or milk may be added.
COCK-A-LEEKIE SOUP
9 Leeks - 3d.
1 set of Giblets
2 oz. Beef Dripping
3 quarts Water or Pot Boilings
Salt and Peppercorns - 4d.
Total Cost - 7d.
Wash and slice up the leeks into pieces about one inch long, put them into a
saucepan with the butter or dripping made thoroughly hot; cover over and
let them cook for half an hour, stirring occasionally. While they are cooking clean
the giblets thoroughly, washing them first in hot and then in cold water. Cut open
the gizzard, remove the stones, and cleanse well. Cut them all up into small pieces
and put them into the saucepan with the leeks, pour over the boiling water or
liquor, put in the peppercorns tied in a piece of muslin, and a piece of bacon rind if
there is any in the larder. Let it simmer slowly for three hours; if not brown
enough add a few drops of caramel, take out the peppercorns and bacon rind,
season to taste, pour into a hot tureen and serve.
CABBAGE AND BACON SOUP
1 Cabbage - 3d.
1 lb. Bacon - 9d.
1 doz. Peppercorns
2 Turnips
1 Carrot
1 Onion
Pieces of Stale Bread - 1d.
Total Cost - 1s. 1d.
Time - Three Hours and a Half
This soup is not as expensive as it appears, for the bacon is served as a dish of
meat, either after the soup or cold for breakfast or tea. Put two quarts of water
into a saucepan; when it boils put in a pound of bacon neither too lean nor too fat.
Let it boil slowly for one hour. The bacon must be well washed and scraped before
cooking, and when it boils skim the pot thoroughly. Well wash the cabbage and soak
it in hot water for half an hour. Take all the water away and put the cabbage into
the saucepan with the bacon and vegetables cut up, and the peppercorns tied in a
piece of muslin; let them simmer together for two and a half hours, take up the
cabbage, and cut it into quarters. Take one quarter and cut it into small pieces
and put it into a soup tureen. Cut some stale pieces of bread into thin
slices and lay on the top, pour over the boiling liquor, and serve. Dish the bacon,
pull off the rind, and put the rest of the cabbage round the dish.
ITALIAN SOUP
2 oz. Macaroni - 1 1/2d.
2 quarts Water or Pot Boilings
2 Tomatoes
1 oz. Butter
2 oz. Cheese Rind - 1 1/2d.
Total Cost - 3 d.
Time - Half an Hour.
Put the water or stock on to boil, and when it boils put in the macaroni and boil
from twenty-five to thirty minutes. While it is boiling grate up a dry piece of
cheese. Put the tomatoes into boiling water and remove the skin, slice them up
and put them into a saucepan with the butter and some pepper and salt, and cook
them for a few minutes. When the macaroni is soft, cut it into pieces one inch
long, put a layer of tomatoes at the bottom of the soup tureen, then a layer of
grated cheese, then one of macaroni; repeat this until all the materials are used
up, pour over it boiling the liquor in which the macaroni has been cooked, cover
down for a few minutes, and serve.
POT-AU-FEU
3 lbs. Leg of Beef - 6d.
2 quarts Water
1 fagot of Herbs
Salt and Pepper
2 Onions
2 Carrots
2 Turnips
1 doz. Peppercorns - 1 1/2d.
Total Cost - 7 1/2 d.
Time - Five Hours
Pot-au-feu is the national dish of France; it is cheap, nourishing and palatable, and
very simple to make. The slower it is cooked the better it is; in fact, in this lies
the whole secret of success, for if it boils instead of simmering it is spoilt.
Tie the meat up into a nice shape with a piece of tape, put it into cold water, bring
slowly to the boil, and very carefully remove the scum; peel and slice up the
vegetables, and put them in with the fagot of herbs and the peppercorns tied in a
piece of muslin; bring to simmering point, and keep it so for five hours. The liquor
can then be served as a soup with part of the vegetables and some sippets of
toast. Take the tapes off the meat, and serve with the rest of the vegetables
round the dish as a border or garnish. The remains of the beef can be pressed
between heavy weights till cold, or put into a brawn tin and served cold with a
salad.
VERMICELLI SOUP
1 oz. Vermicelli - 1d.
Vegetables and Saffron
2 quarts Bone Stock - 1d.
Total Cost - 2 d.
Time - One Hour
The stock for this soup should be good and in a strong jelly when cold. Put it into a
saucepan with three or four threads of saffron, an onion or leek stuck with six
cloves, 1 dozen white peppercorns and some salt, and boil all together for half an
hour; then strain out the vegetables and put it back into the saucepan. It should
be of a bright straw colour; if it is not, a thread more saffron may be added
before straining. Put in the vermicelli broken small, and simmer for twenty
minutes; it is then ready to serve.
MULLIGATAWNY SOUP
2 quarts Stock
1 Apple
1 Onion
1 Carrot - 1d.
1/2 oz. Curry Powder
1 oz. Flour - 1d.
1 oz. Butter - 1d.
Total Cost - 3d.
Time - One Hour
The liquor in which poultry or a rabbit has been boiled is the best for this
soup. Slice up the apple, onion, and carrot, and fry them in the butter; sprinkle
over the curry powder and flour and brown that too; pour over the boiling stock
and stir until it boils up, simmer gently for one hour, then rub through a sieve and
return to the saucepan. Bring to the boil, flavour with salt and lemon juice. Pour
into a warm tureen and serve. Send well-boiled rice to the table with this soup.
FRENCH SOUP
3 Potatoes
3 Carrots
2 Turnips - 1 1/2d.
2 quarts Bone Stock
Pepper
2 Onions
1/2 stalk Celery - 1d.
1 oz. Butter - 1d.
1 teaspoonful Sugar
Salt - 1/2d.
Total Cost - 4d.
Time - One Hour.
Peel and slice up the vegetables and sprinkle them with the sugar and salt, and put
them into a saucepan with the butter, and sweat for five minutes. Pour over the
boiling stock and stir until it boils; boil slowly for an hour, then rub through a sieve.
If it is too thick, reduce it with a little more stock or milk, return to a saucepan,
and bring to the boil. When tomatoes are in season slice up two with the other
vegetables; these will make the soup a good colour and improve the flavour.
SAGO SOUP
3 oz. Sago - 1d.
1 pint Milk - 2 1/2d.
2 quarts Bone Stock
1 Leek
Salt and Pepper - 1/2d.
Total Cost - 4d.
Time - Half an Hour.
Wash the sago in cold water, boil the leek in the stock for ten minutes,
take it out and stir in the sago; continue stirring until the sago is transparent and
the stock quite thick, then pour in the milk and bring up to the boil. Season with
salt and pepper, and serve.
CELERY SOUP
2 heads of Celery - 2d.
2 quarts Pot Boilings
1 pint of Milk - 2 1/2d.
1 oz. Sago - 1/2d.
Total Cost - 5d.
Time - One Hour
If vegetables have been boiled with the meat the stock will be sufficiently
flavoured; if not, boil an onion and carrot in it and strain out. Wash the celery
thoroughly and cut it into pieces one inch long, put it into the boiling stock and boil
for half an hour, then sprinkle in 1 oz of sago and stir until it is transparent. Pour
in the milk and bring to boiling point; it is then ready to serve. This is an excellent
soup for any one suffering from or subject to rheumatism or gout.
TURNIP AND RICE SOUP
4 Turnips - 2d.
1/4 lb. Rice - 1d.
2 quarts Water
1 pint Milk - 2 1/2d.
Onion and Salt - 1/2d.
Total Cost - 6d.
Time - One Hour and a Quarter
Peel and slice up the turnips, wash the rice and put into a saucepan with the onion
and 1 dozen white peppercorns. Pour over the water and boil for an hour, rub
through a sieve and return to the saucepan, with the milk and a seasoning of salt
and pepper; stir until it boils, then pour into a warm tureen and sprinkle
some chopped parsley on top. This soup is much improved by putting one ounce of
butter into the water in which the rice and turnips are boiled.
TAPIOCA SOUP
2 oz. Tapioca - 1d.
1 Onion
1 Carrot
3 quarts Bone Stock - 1/2d.
Boil the onion and carrot in the stock for twenty minutes. If the stock is not a
good colour put in half a teaspoonful of burnt sugar. Strain out the vegetables,
wash the tapioca in cold water and stir it in; continue stirring until the tapioca is
quite clear, flavour with salt and lemon juice, and serve very hot. This soup should
be quite transparent and of a bright brown colour.
WATER SOUCHET
6 Small Fish - 1s.6d.
Vegetables
Salt and Pepper
Lemon Juice - 1d.
Total Cost - 1s. 7d.
Time - One Hour and a Half.
Choose small fish of different kinds and fillet them. As only half the fillets are
wanted for the souchet, the rest may be dressed in another way. Wash the bones
in cold water and remove the black substance from them, put them into two
quarts of cold water with a teaspoonful of salt, and when it boils remove the scum
and add 1 dozen peppercorns, one carrot, one small turnip, one onion, a small
piece of celery, and a fagot of herbs. Put the vegetables in whole. Boil this
together for one hour, then strain off through a hair sieve and return to the
saucepan; wash the vegetables that have been boiled in it, slice them up and put
them into the liquor. Cut the fillets of fish into small pieces and put them
in; simmer for half an hour, then put in a little lemon juice, pour into a tureen, and
sprinkle a little chopped parsley on the top. Send brown bread and butter to table
with it and a lemon.
OYSTER SOUP
1 bottle Oysters - 1s.
1 pint of Milk - 2 1/2d.
Cornflour and Vegetables
2 quarts Fish Stock - 1d.
Total Cost - 1 s. 3 1/2 d.
Time - One Hour.
If there is no fish stock, use pot boilings. As this is a white soup a special
saucepan must be used. Put the stock and the liquor from the bottle of oysters
into this stewpan with an onion stuck with six cloves, 2 dozen white peppercorns,
and a fagot of herbs, and boil together for half an hour, then strain off and return
to the saucepan with the milk. When nearly boiling thicken with a tablespoonful of
cornflour and boil two or three minutes; put in the oysters and simmer for five
minutes. Flavour with a little lemon juice, nutmeg, and salt. Pour into a warm
tureen, and send fried bread to table with it.
BROWN MACARONI SOUP
1 1/2 oz. Macaroni - 1 1/2d.
1 oz. Butter - 1d.
Vegetables - 1d.
Cornflour
2 quarts Bone Stock - 1/2d.
Total Cost - 4d.
Time - One Hour and a Quarter.
Slice up the onions or leeks, one carrot, and make a fagot of herbs; fry them in
the butter with 1 dozen peppercorns till they are quite brown, but not burnt.
Sprinkle over a tablespoonful of cornflour, and when brown pour over the boiling
stock and stir till it boils up; let it simmer for an hour. If it is not brown
enough, burn a little sugar in a spoon and stir it in. If half a teaspoonful of sugar is
sprinkled over the vegetables when they are frying they will brown much quicker.
When the vegetables are soft rub the soup through a wire sieve and return to the
saucepan. Boil the macaroni in salt and water for twenty minutes, strain off, and
cut into pieces one inch long; put these into the soup and simmer for a quarter of
an hour. Flavour with a little salt and pepper if necessary, and pour into a hot
tureen.
HARICOT BEAN SOUP
1 lb. Haricot Beans - 4d.
2 Onions
1/2 pint of Milk
2 quarts Bone Stock - 1 1/2d.
Total Cost